Anne Coletta · March 31, 2011 at 3:12pm

“If George Bush had done [this] or said [that], do you know how the media would have reported it?”

Well, yes, I do, and you do, too.

But we’re now over two years into the presidency of Barack Obama and I think it’s time to retire this particular meme.

Of course, the media doesn’t play fair—it never has and it never will. Part of Media Criticism 101 that every schoolchild should be taught is that everyone, and I mean everyone, comes to an event with their own worldview, and that worldview affects how they perceive and react to the event. There is an objective Truth—we just each see a very small part of it at any one time (and some of us miss it completely).

U.S. journalists as a whole are predominantly progressive: for whatever reason (and there are several theories out there), that’s a fact.

So, how to handle the frustration when you see the mainstream media once again glossing over something President Obama is supporting, something they pilloried former President Bush for? Remember, the meme is the message. Moderates and conservatives should want the message to be forceful, straight-forward, and effective, not whiny, petulant, or weak.

So, no matter how hard it is, resist the urge to compare and contrast. Concentrate on facts, not feelings, and push back as hard as you can against the media machine. With "kinetic military action" if necessary.

Comments:


Michael Tee
Joined
Jul '10
Michael Tee

Anne Coletta:

Of course, the media doesn’t play fair—it never has and it never will. Part of Media Criticism 101 that every schoolchild should be taught is that everyone, and I mean everyone, comes to an event with their own worldview, and that worldview affects how they perceive and react to the event. There is an objective Truth—we just each see a very small part of it at any one time (and some of us miss it completely).

U.S. journalists as a whole are predominantly progressive: for whatever reason (and there are several theories out there), that’s a fact.

I don't see how Reagan won the election. No one I know voted for him!

Not everyone knows that the media is leftist and doesn't play fair.

That is why this is so effective.

Bryan G. Stephens
Joined
May '10
Bryan G. Stephens
Andrew Klavan: Although I understand what Anne's saying here, in general, I strongly disagree.  Okay, Bush/Obama comparisons are weak because they lack proof - though occasionally they are so apt, they shouldn't be ignored.  On the broader subject, however, the media's bias should be attacked relentlessly, ceaselessly.  We should never, ever throw up our hands and say, to coin a phrase, that's the way it is, but cut them off at every dishonest, skewed and perfidious pass.  To say we all bring our worldview to a subject is beside the point.  To shrug off the bias is fatal.  To say, "Hey, the press is lefty, what can you do?" is like saying, "Oh well, it's a white man's world!"  No, it needs to change and it won't change unless we attack it relentlessly, show the public how unfair and corrupt it is, and bring it crashing to the ground. · Mar 31 at 7:55am

Andrew,

I was afraid to make the racial or sexual equality arguments. Maybe I should not have been. Thanks for doing it.

KC Mulville
Joined
Jan '11
KC Mulville

I think it's important to keep pointing it out.

Like it or not, the media serves as the place where Americans find out about what everyone else is thinking. When the media distorts that perspective, it succeeds only because the audience is lulled into the belief that the media has correctly reported the state of things. That's why, every single time the media distorts an issue, we need to highlight it, and remind the audience that the media is actively distorting what they see.

Of course, I've seen media criticism where a conservative complains that Peter Jennings arched his eyebrow at a particular story. That doesn't sway me. But when they show statistics that a story that "hurts" Democrats gets passed over, but that the media leaps at the possibility of a Republican scandal, those are more persuasive.

Keep the pressure on, I say.

ManBearPig
Joined
May '10
Ryan Gaines

 My favorite canard is that because Fox News doesn't toe the liberal line, they must be lying liars and ultra-conservative. I love to shove this survey in their noses when they repeat the liberal talking point that Fox is evil. It shows that the only remotely unbisaed news coverage during the 2008 election was Fox News! This survey is also great because it's not Rasmussen, it's Pew, not exactly a friend of the right.

Jimmy Carter
Joined
Jul '10
Jimmy Carter

"Moderates and conservatives should want the message to be forceful....and push back as hard as you can...."

So called "moderates" are not "forceful" by definition, nor do they "push" anything. Moderates get pulled. 

Paul A. Rahe
Andrew Klavan: Although I understand what Anne's saying here, in general, I strongly disagree.  Okay, Bush/Obama comparisons are weak because they lack proof - though occasionally they are so apt, they shouldn't be ignored.  On the broader subject, however, the media's bias should be attacked relentlessly, ceaselessly.  We should never, ever throw up our hands and say, to coin a phrase, that's the way it is, but cut them off at every dishonest, skewed and perfidious pass.  To say we all bring our worldview to a subject is beside the point.  To shrug off the bias is fatal.  To say, "Hey, the press is lefty, what can you do?" is like saying, "Oh well, it's a white man's world!"  No, it needs to change and it won't change unless we attack it relentlessly, show the public how unfair and corrupt it is, and bring it crashing to the ground. · Mar 31 at 7:55am

I agree with Andrew 100%. In any case, the media bias is much more egregious now than it has ever been.

Paul DeRocco
Joined
Aug '10
Paul DeRocco
Andrew Klavan: Although I understand what Anne's saying here, in general, I strongly disagree.  Okay, Bush/Obama comparisons are weak because they lack proof - though occasionally they are so apt, they shouldn't be ignored.  On the broader subject, however, the media's bias should be attacked relentlessly, ceaselessly.

I agree. Pointing out “If George Bush had done [this] or said [that], do you know how the media would have reported it?” seems to me a very good way to "push back as hard as you can against the media machine." There's nothing intrinsically whiny about it. Pointing out that the Libya Coalition is smaller than the Iraq Coalition, or that Bush got Congressional approval and Obama still hasn't, is a powerful argument. Pointing out that the left complains about targets on a campaign map while yawning whenever their own radical wing riots in the streets isn't whiny or petulant, and shuts them up pretty good.

Aaron Miller
Joined
May '10
Aaron Miller

Well said, Anne. Rather than whine, Republicans should laugh. The Left has long known the power of ridicule to make its object seem weak. While I don't recommend making a habit of insulting the hippies as they do us, we should treat their claims as the ridiculous distortions they are.

It's more about manner than content. But conservatives empower liberals by repeating their nonsense and responding to every baseless accusation. The Left controls the public conversation largely because conservatives enable them.

Franco
Joined
Sep '10
Franco

I am one for presenting Obama vs. Obama as I've demonstrated in several posts. I believe this is most effective. Just present his words without comment. You Tube is great for that  Let them defend him. I  agree that the presentation couched in "when Bush did x..." is ineffective and whiney.

dittoheadadt
Joined
Oct '10
dittoheadadt

James Taranto's "Accountability Journalism" pieces are excellent for pointing this out to Libs or skeptical Mods.

His "Which Party?" pieces are similarly effective in showing how reluctant the state-controlled media are to identify a Democrat's party affiliation in a negative news story while they identify the GOP in the opening paragraph, if not the opening sentence.  I think it was a few days before many of them reported Eliot Spitzer's party affiliation. The more we point these things out, the more likely it is that people's skepticism of the state-controlled media will grow.


Joined
May '10
Mike Riscili

Isn't the whining effective to some extent?  It appears to me the Left does a lot of whining about everything and thus controls the message, regardless of what the objective truth is.  The Bush/Obama comparison will necessarily fail because of the perspective of the people reporting what happened.  The media assumed everything Bush did was suspect and there needed to be proof he was doing the right thing.  With Obama, the media assumes everything Obama does is right and there needs to be proof that he is wrong.   Because there generally is no standard of proof that will move the media off of their preconceived notions the comparisons are futile.

It always amazed me how the media meme wtih Bush was that he was generally dumb.   Yet when it came to policies the media didn't agree with (e.g. Iraq) he was an evil mastermind able to weave several lies together to dupe the rest of us into going along with him.

The point that needs to be made is that the media is really not in the news business anymore, but opinion journalism occasionally supported by selectively citing facts that support the reporter's world view.

Wylee Coyote
Joined
Jul '10
Wylee Coyote

While I think we should watch our tone for signs of whining, I disagree that the comparisons should not be made.  They should be a side dish, not the main course.

The glaring inconsistencies need to be pointed out.  Because if you let them get away with it, they will get away with it.


Joined
Nov '10
Elizabeth Dunn
Michael Tee: Not everyone knows that the media is leftist and doesn't play fair.

You are correct, but that doesn't mean people shouldn't take personal responsibility for vetting their news sources.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In