Glenn Reynolds has a new Broadside, this one about the collapse of K-12 education. But here is the question.  Conservatives often point out, correctly, that while the amount of money spent on education, even controlling for inflation, has skyrocketed over the years (for example, just on the federal level education spending is up 140% over the last decade), the results aren't there to justify that money.  But, conservatives also lament the breakdown of the family.  One of the results that follows from family breakdown is a decrease in educational performance.  So isn't the fact that our educational performance is flat (as measured by SAT and NAEP scores, for example) over the last few decades actually a perverse triumph? Given the explosion of illegitimacy, just holding serve should be a great victory, correct?

Can someone give some analysis? Can anyone at Ricochet even attempt to address the seeming contradiction in these conservative talking points?  I am trying to improve my own thinking on this subject. 

Comments:


EJHill
Joined
May '10
EJHill

I guess there's gotta be a pony in there somewhere.

Yeah...ok.
Joined
Jan '11
Yeah...ok.

Victory hell! It is worse than defeat. This line of reasoning could be used to suggest that K-12 can somehow substitute for an intact family.

Mama Toad
Joined
Feb '11
Mama Toad

Or does it reflect the dumbing-down of those tests?

EJHill
Joined
May '10
EJHill

I thinc the edjewkation sistem is fine the way it is. It learned me the scils I needed to git a good job as a teacher! My unyon rep says I have a job for lyfe now and it maks me happi.

Cattle King
Joined
Aug '12
Cattle King
Mama Toad: Or does it reflect the dumbing-down of those tests? · 17 minutes ago

The tests have very strong reasons to maintain consistency, so I cannot believe they've been dumbed down. 

Cattle King
Joined
Aug '12
Cattle King
Yeah...ok.: Victory hell! It is worse than defeat. This line of reasoning could be used to suggest that K-12 can somehow substitute for an intact family. · 34 minutes ago

I am asking an empirical not normative question.  Let's try to answer it.  If family breakdown leads to a decline in educational attainment but our best measures suggest a kind of flattness in educational attainment, what accounts for this?  I am presenting a hypothesis, one with which I may not agree, btw.  The hypothesis is this: the vast sums of money spent on education have had the effect of maintaining stasis in educational attainment.  Can anyone give me an intelligent critique of that? 

raycon and lindacon
Joined
Oct '10
raycon and lindacon

You presuppose that the decline of the family is independent of the education system.  The government school system has traded education in subjects developed over centuries to prepare children for adult life in the world around them for subjects that normalize a life outside of their own families, communalism, and indoctrinate them in the social activism of government.

A significant part of the teaching day is dedicated to the dilution of the family as the life influence of a child.  He learns sex not as a matter of purity and commitment, but as the mechanics of pleasure.  He learns that his family are members of the pathological America with a history to be embarrassed of.  He learns that his dad, if he is a part of the family, engages in a world of commerce that preys upon and exploits the weak.

The education system is not the basis for a successful adult, the family is.  But the success of the education system in undermining that family is the problem. 

Tests are a meaningless measure of educational success. 

Lives well lived is. 

And by that measure, American education is a success, measured by the damage it has done.

Limestone Cowboy
Joined
Oct '10
Limestone Cowboy

Standardized tests like SAT  are not the best indicator of overall K-12 system performance.

These tests measure only the performance of students who have to some degree have already succeeded in the K-12 system (as "college material").  First, you have to do some analysis to see what proportion of SAT takers come from failed or never-formed families

To see the effects of public education on these children, I'd be interested would be in standardized math and literacy scores taken throughout the K-12 process, and also in the graduation rates.  From what I recall of  my daughters tests, they have been dumbed down.

I say this with great respect for teachers who deal with this daily.  Teachers and schools cannot be a substitute family.

Also,  there is systemic cheating by educators in standardized testing, so are the reported outcomes meaningful?

See here (Atlanta)

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Education/2011/0705/America-s-biggest-teacher-and-principal-cheating-scandal-unfolds-in-Atlanta

and here  (Indiana)

http://www.wthr.com/story/18917947/teachers-disciplined-for-cheating-scandal-at-north-central-high-school

and especially here (nationwide)

http://www.propublica.org/article/americas-most-outrageous-teacher-cheating-scandals

Edited on January 21, 2013 at 8:03pm
Z in MT
Joined
Dec '12
Z in MT

Cattle King

Mama Toad: Or does it reflect the dumbing-down of those tests? · 17 minutes ago

The tests have very strong reasons to maintain consistency, so I cannot believe they've been dumbed down.  · 1 hour ago

I wouldn't be so sure.  Even tests like the SAT have pressures to lower standards as the number of students "qualifying" for college through the SAT drops then more students will decide to try for one of the other "qualifying" exams like the ACT.

Due to the unlimited availability of Federal student loan money, colleges and universities want to admit as many marginal students as possible.

sawatdeeka
Joined
Nov '10
sawatdeeka

ED Hirsch has recently completed a three-part series analyzing test results.  It won't address the family part of your question, as he usually doesn't bring that up, but it may give a partial answer:

http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2013/01/09/if-hes-so-important-why-havent-we-heard-of-him/

http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2013/01/10/the-work-of-a-great-test-scientist-helps-explain-the-failure-of-no-child-left-behind/ 

http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2013/01/15/blame-the-tests/ 

It will also trigger new questions.  :-)

drlorentz
Joined
Sep '10
drlorentz

The SAT scores were renormalized 10 or 15 years ago. A 700 in math does not mean the same thing it did before. The same goes for the verbal test. The renormalization happened before the writing test was added. Since I interview candidates for admission to a well-known university I was given a conversion table by the admissions committee. I threw it out some years ago since we have a new normal. Use older SAT scores with caution.

Howellis
Joined
Apr '12
Howellis

The SAT was "re-centered" some years ago, adding 100 points to the average score. This could help explain that what looks like stasis is actually decline.

EJHill
Joined
May '10
EJHill

I wasn't just being facetious in my earlier post (#4). I used to sub in our local school system (aka, $65/day babysitting for teenagers) and I was once given a seating chart in the file for a teacher that had not one but two egregious spelling errors on it.

I made sure that none of my children were ever put under his supervision!

Schrodinger's Cat
Joined
Mar '12
Schrodinger's Cat

What causes educational outcomes? Causation has not been determined because there are many factors that  affect the result. Family structure and income, parent involvement, teacher training, educational spending all play a role.

In regard to funding, one problem is that much of the money is wasted on government mandated programs that are not directly educational. This requires hiring administrators to run the programs. So, while spending levels go up, little benefit goes to actual treaching.

Some correlation studies have been done.

However, after applying the model to the data, it belies the conventional wisdom. The regression model yields a correlation coefficient of only .13. That is a weak correlation coefficient. This indicates that there is a weak relationship between education funding and graduation rates.

http://www.michiganpolicy.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=982:correlation-between-k-12-per-pupil-funding-and-graduation-rates&catid=37:k-12-education-national-context&Itemid=121

 

Continued:

Snirtler
Joined
Nov '12
Snirtler
Cattle King:  So isn't the fact that our educational performance is flat (as measured by SAT and NAEP scores, for example) over the last few decades actually a perverse triumph?

Based on the SATs, the picture is uneven.

The reading score is not flat. The 2012 score was the lowest in four decades. So no triumph there.

http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-09-24/local/35495510_1_scores-board-president-gaston-caperton-test-takers

The math score fell to its lowest (492) around 1980, but in 2012 was at 514, about the same level as in 1970.

If you want to look for trends, here are SAT scores from 1967 to 2004 (didn't look too hard, so missing the latest figures ):

https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d04/tables/dt04_129.asp

Edited on January 21, 2013 at 8:56pm
Pseudodionysius
Joined
Sep '10
Pseudodionysius

SAT reading scores for graduating high school seniors this year reached the lowest point in nearly four decades, reflecting a steady decline in performance in that subject on the college admissions test, the College Board reported Wednesday.

In the Washington area, one of the nation’s leading producers of college-bound students, educators were scrambling to understand double-digit drops in test scores in Montgomery and Prince William counties and elsewhere.

I don't think this should strike anyone as news. There's a Kickstarter program for people who want to do something about it. Traditional grammar, logic and rhetoric training has been destroyed by the Education establishment as revealed in the War On Grammar.

Next question.

Edited on January 21, 2013 at 9:05pm
Diaryof1
Joined
Aug '12
Diaryof1

This WaPo article about blaming stressed-out parents for failing education makes a point about spending much energy figuring out who to blame. Just another version of the chicken-or-the-egg.

Instead, focus on solutions not on placing blame. I do believe that it's impossible to sort out what portion of blame belongs to societal/family breakdown, what part belongs to the educational bureaucracy, and what effect the one had on the other. Forget about funding studies to find out this information and just start from where you are --there are a thousand different starting points and indeed battles should be fought on every front, from individual families to local communities to top levels of Washington.

Those gifted in family counseling should do everything in their power to help families in crisis to function better; those with teaching gifts should teach, help others become better teachers, and even start better schools; those in positions of public power should use their influence to create more efficient models of education and throw out the vile. It will take every single moral, conservative, intelligent member of society to solve this problem using their varied gifts.

Pseudodionysius
Joined
Sep '10
Pseudodionysius

Can someone give some analysis? Can anyone at Ricochet even attempt to address the seeming contradiction in these conservative talking points?  I am trying to improve my own thinking on this subject. 

Read E.D. Hirsch on the problem with content less curricula. Sol Stern has written about him extensively in City Journal.

Schrodinger's Cat
Joined
Mar '12
Schrodinger's Cat

Cntd from #14

We show that outcomes for both types of children in blended families -- stepchildren and their half-siblings who are the joint biological children of both parents -- are similar to each other and substantially worse than outcomes for children reared in traditional nuclear families.

Family Structure and Children’s Educational Outcomes:Blended Families, Stylized Facts, and Descriptive Regressions*

Donna K. Ginther and Robert A. Pollak

Contact information Ginther:

Department of Economics

University of Kansas

1300 Sunnyside Drive

Lawrence, KS 66045-7585

(785)864-3251 phone

 

Also,

In this article, we set out to examine the relationship between family disruption and children’s educational attainment.

children who experience a parental disruption are still 6–13 percentage points less likely to successfully make the transition from lower secondary school and to complete higher secondary education

disruption has the strongest effect early rather than later in the educational career.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2831341/

Spin
Joined
Nov '10
Ken Owsley

I was trying to figure out how many kids take the SATs, per capita, on the working hypothesis that the failure of families causes a lot of kids to simply not try.  I couldn't find any data on the subject, however.  

I would guess that fewer and fewer students take the SAT, and the ones that do are headed for success as their families aren't suffering from the decline.  Wish I had more data to verify.  


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In