Paul A. Rahe · Apr 21, 2011 at 3:01pm

Things don’t always work out as one expects. Just ask Paul Krugman . . . On second thought, don't bother.

Jared_Loughner

Back in January, for example, right after Gabrielle Giffords was shot and nearly killed, Krugman published an op-ed column in The New York Times entitled “Climate of Hate” in which he attempted to blame the attempted assassination on Michele Bachmann, Glenn Beck, Bill O’Reilly, and the Republicans who failed to denounce them for engaging in what Krugman termed “eliminationist rhetoric.” Soon thereafter, however, it became evident that the chief object of the perpetrator’s hatred was none other than George W. Bush. It says much about the man who calls his blog “The Conscience of a Liberal” that, when confronted with these circumstances, he never even broke his stride. I guess that being a New York Times columnist and a man of liberal conscience means that you never have to say you’re sorry.

 On Saturday, Krugman stepped in it again, dramatically reversing course and asserting that “civility is the last refuge of scoundrels.” “What,” he asked in the course of defending President Obama’s rude treatment of Paul Ryan and the other Republicans he had personally invited to attend his address at George Washington University, “are we supposed to have a civil discussion about?”

What goes around comes around, as they say – for today, at a fundraiser in San Francisco, Barack Obama got exactly what Krugman asked for. Those in attendance had paid $35,000 each for the privilege of being there -- $30,000 to go to the Democratic Party, and $5,000 for the President’s re-election campaign – and some in their number evidently thought that they were entitled.

BradleyManning

In the middle of the President’s address, a woman in a white dress suddenly stood up and interrupted his speech, announcing, “Mr. President, we wrote you a song.” Then, to the President’s evident dismay, she and nine others at her table launched into a ditty which should perhaps be entitled “The Ballad of Bradley Manning” (See VIDEO here):

Dear Mr. President we honor you today sir
 Each of us brought you $5,000
 It takes a lot of Benjamins to run a campaign
 I paid my dues, where's our change?
 We'll vote for you in 2012, yes that's true
 Look at the Republicans - what else can we do
 Even though we don't know if we'll retain our liberties
 In what you seem content to call a free society
 Yes it's true that Terry Jones is legally free
 To burn a people's holy book in shameful effigy
 But at another location in this country
 Alone in a 6x12 cell sits Bradley
 23 hours day is night
 The 5th and 8th Amendments say this kind of thing ain't right
 We paid our dues, where's our change?

“That was a nice song,” an obviously displeased Obama reportedly responded. "Now where was I?" As was indicated by that song, he began, "Over the last 2 and a half years, change turned out to be tougher than we expected.”

Methinks Professor Krugman should be a bit more careful about what he wishes for. As people in Wisconsin have recently been reminded, the real source of incivility and genuine political hatred in American political life is the utopian left.

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque

The Conscience of a Liberal - a thing whose species has gone extinct and that exists today only in the fossil record.

Samwise Gamgee
Joined
Jun '10
Samwise Gamgee

The funniest part (or maybe the most pathetic part) of the song is that they equate the burning of a "holy book" to stealing hundreds of thousands of documents from the military and handing them over to the enemy...

Why didn't they include all the poor murders and rapists that were robbed of their freedoms too by all those freedom-haters out there?  I'll eagerly await the remix.

Why did these concerned and intelligent citizens pay 350 grand to perform their song... haven't they heard of you tube......?

AmishDude
Joined
Dec '10
AmishDude

I will never ever understand the love that liberals have for criminals.  At the very least they should realize that this makes them look bad.

Western Chauvinist
Joined
Dec '10
Western Chauvinist
AmishDude: I will never ever understand the love that liberals have for criminals.  At the very least they should realize that this makes them look bad. · Apr 21 at 4:53pm

I think I can explain it.  They only despise the power of the state when the state is imposing the rule of law on America hating leftists.

Paul DeRocco
Joined
Aug '10
Paul DeRocco
Paul A. Rahe: Methinks Professor Krugman should be a bit more careful about what he wishes for. As people in Wisconsin have recently been reminded, the real source of incivility and genuine political hatred in American political life is the utopian left. ·

Krugman is being quite consistent, albeit in a way he would perhaps not care to emphasize: conservatives are the opposite of liberals, so conservatives need to be civil while liberals ought to be angry and aggressive.

Keith Preston
Joined
May '10
Keith Preston

Methinks Mr. Obama is going to be getting a fair amount of sour grapes from the "civil" ideology this campaign.

Charles Mark
Joined
Aug '10
Charles Mark

If one followed the money would MoveOn.Org feature, I wonder? (President Betrayus?) And if Jones had stuffed the Koran page by page down his trousers, Berger-style, would that be not such a big deal?

Capt. Spaulding
Joined
Apr '11
Capt. Spaulding

The infantile behavior of the self-righteous left, so often encouraged by the likes of media pooh-bahs, serves to drive sensible people to conservatism. As Michael Ledeen likes to say, faster please.

Ross Conatser
Joined
Sep '10
Ross Conatser

Keep it up, Krugman should be ridiculed early and often.

I am not going to cry in my bear over media bias, but the media has largely ignored the Manning story.  Can anyone really think that if W was still president that Manning's picture would run on the front page of the NY times for 60 straight days.  It is a bad story either way, the facts would be roughly the same.  But the context of the stories would be sooo different.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In