Possibly buried in the middle of the debate was a stark difference about the role of the federal government.  Tellingly, Obama answered the question without saying a single word about the Constitution -- the supreme law that creates the federal government and defines its role.  Instead, he rattled off a bizarre string of metaphors -- the government provides "ladders" and "gateways" and a "framework" for personal success.  A half-hearted attempt to soften the brute force of federal power.

Romney began his answer by pointing to the text of the Constitution on the backdrop of the stage.   And in other answers, he pointed to the 10th amendment and pointed out that states and localities have the primary role on education. 

I suspect that the PBS folks set this up as a stand-alone topic because they assumed it would play to Obama's advantage as he talks about Uncle Sam handing out free kittens to everyone while Romney Warbucks lets everyone starve.  I think the answers helped Romney (well, at least in my books).

Comments:


Anne R. Pierce

Agree.  The more we talk about the Constitution and Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness the better.

Barfly
Joined
Oct '11
Barfly

I imagine Lehrer and PBS were surprised by more than that topic tonight, and it'll take them a while to find their balance again. The left lives in a fantasy world, but it has to be hard to maintain the walls after the drubbing they just took.

Mark Zdeblick
Joined
May '10
Mark Zdeblick

If pictures tell a 1000 words, NBC's side-by-side presentation of the two told it all: Obama looked like Eeyore: always frowning, looking dreary and downcast; Romney, particularly when Obama started talking about how the Cleveland Clinic was lowering costs, was Tigger: upbeat, smiling, confident, always ready with a concise, articulate answer.

Keith Rice
Joined
Apr '12
Highlama

Romney sewed up some undecided conservatives tonight, but probably not enough to move the needle. I'm hoping the independents finally saw what they were looking for.

Babci
Joined
Jul '12
Babci

I loved hearing Chris Matthews shouting at Rachel Madow, Sharpton et al.: "What was Romney doing out there...he was winning!"

I've got a whole new respect for teleprompters...what a job they've done for the last 4 years.

Pseudodionysius
Joined
Sep '10
Pseudodionysius

sans TOTUS, POTUS is Bupkis.

GLDIII
Joined
Mar '11
GLDIII

What do you expect from a "Constitutional Lawyer" from Harvaaard 

Umbra Fractus
Joined
Nov '10
Umbra Fractus
Mark Zdeblick: If pictures tell a 1000 words, NBC's side-by-side presentation of the two told it all: Obama looked like Eeyore: always frowning, looking dreary and downcast; Romney, particularly when Obama started talking about how the Cleveland Clinic was lowering costs, was Tigger: upbeat, smiling, confident, always ready with a concise, articulate answer. · 13 minutes ago

And for once his smile looked genuine. It wasn't the fake "I'm so happy to be here," you'd expect from the Romney caricature, it was a genuine "I got this," smile of confidence.

This compared to the coprophagic grin Obama busted out, clearly thinking, "I need to stop pouting!"

Illiniguy
Joined
Mar '11
Illiniguy

Off his game, the moderator lost control of the debate, yada yada yada. Tonight really made the next debate can't miss TV. Let's see if Obama actually prepares for that one. Next week between Ryan and Biden? I'd pay cash money to see that.


Joined
Jan '12
Barbara Kidder

Who's wondering if Jim Lehrer is eating Tums right now, and NOT answering his phone...

Grendel
Joined
Apr '11
Grendel

I was glad Romney mentioned the Declaration's attribution of rights to God, but he described government's role as a kind of nanny state rather than a a protector of god-given rights.

He also completely missed pointing out that it was government interference  from beginning to end that caused the financial cataclysm in 2007-2008.

Grendel
Joined
Apr '11
Grendel
Adam Freedman: And in other answers, he pointed to the 10th amendment and pointed out that states and localities have the primary role on education. 

Uh, actually, parents have the primary role in education.  The state  school has been an instrument of social planners from the beginning.

Spin
Joined
Nov '10
Ken Owsley

Grendel: context.  The question was about what role government has.  Romney's point is that state government should trump federal government when it comes to having a role in education.  I'm good with that.  


Joined
Jan '12
Barbara Kidder

Grendel: I was glad Romney mentioned the Declaration's attribution of rights to God, but he described government's role as a kind of nanny state rather than a a protector of god-given rights.

He also completely missed pointing out that it was government interference  from beginning to end that caused the financial cataclysm in 2007-2008. · 8 minutes ago

You're absolutely right;  because he's not a libertarian, and doesn't believe that,..."that government governs best, that governs least."


Joined
Jan '12
Barbara Kidder
Ken Owsley: Grendel: context.  The question was about what role government has.  Romney's point is that state government should trump federal government when it comes to having a role in education.  I'm good with that.   · 13 minutes ago

He also used that same point, to good effect, in explaining his state's health insurance program.

James Of England
Joined
Apr '11
James Of England

Barbara Kidder

Grendel: I was glad Romney mentioned the Declaration's attribution of rights to God, but he described government's role as a kind of nanny state rather than a a protector of god-given rights.

He also completely missed pointing out that it was government interference  from beginning to end that caused the financial cataclysm in 2007-2008. · 8 minutes ago

You're absolutely right;  because he's not a libertarian, and doesn't believe that,..."that government governs best, that governs least." · 3 minutes ago

I don't think that Grendel is right. He does say that Americans believe in protecting "one another", and that the right to life means that America should provide a military.

He does not say that we should have a nanny state, but rather that we ought "not to have the government substitute itself for the rights of free individuals. And what we're seeing right now is, in my view, a -- a trickle-down government approach, which has government thinking it can do a better job than free people pursuing their dreams. And it's not working. "

He attacks food stamps. He's arguing for more freedom, more charity, less government.

James Of England
Joined
Apr '11
James Of England

Grendel

Adam Freedman: in other answers, he pointed to the 10th amendment and pointed out that states and localities have the primary role on education. 

Uh, actually, parents have the primary role in education.  The state  school has been an instrument of social planners from the beginning.

In this debate, he hinted at the parent's role.

So all federal funds, instead of going to the -- to the state or to the school district, I'd have go, if you will, follow the child and let the parent and the child decide where to send their -- their -- their student.

And

The right answer for government is say, How do we make the private sector become more efficient and more effective? How do we get schools to be more competitive? Let's grade them. I propose we grade our schools so parents know which schools are succeeding and failing, so they can take their child to a -- to a school that he's being more successful.

If you want a fuller explanation of Mitt's view of education, though, he gives an excellent talk on it here. I feel confident that you will find plenty of emphasis on the parental role.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In