Diane Ellis · January 12, 2012 at 12:03am

James O'Keefe's Project Veritas has struck again.  The organization's latest exposé reveals how easy it is to vote in New Hampshire — even if you're deceased.

On New Hampshire Primary Day, Project Veritas sent a team of investigators into polling places with a list of deceased voters to see if they would be permitted to vote.

We tested more than a dozen polling places, simply walking up and stating the name of the deceased, and in all but one instance -- where an alert poll worker actually knew the recently deceased -- we were handed ballots.

While our investigators cast no votes and returned the ballots, there was nothing stopping our team, or anyone else, from illegally influencing the outcome of a presidential primary.

In fact, as shown in the video, Project Veritas investigators insisted on presenting identification in order to vote, but were told repeatedly, "you don't need it.

With the 8 vote margin in the 2012 Iowa Caucus, it is clear that voter fraud can influence the outcome of an election.   It is important to note that Project Veritas' team had the ability to cast more than a dozen votes in this latest investigation.

Here's the first video of the investigation, though Project Veritas has plans to reveal more.

(h/t Daily Caller)

Comments:


Percival
Joined
Mar '11
Percival

So what?  In Cook County, not only can the dead vote, they do it in alphabetical order!

Diane Ellis

A college classmate of mine recently posted this image on his Facebook wall with the following caption.

Voter Fraud

There is a huge problem in America right now; young people aren’t voting. What’s worse is that many politicians know this, and make great efforts to keep it that way. They figure it’s easier to suppress student voters who tend to vote a certain way than to appeal to them with strong messages or good ideas. As far as we’re concerned this is the ultimate theft. It destroys our faith in the political system and makes our democracy less inclusive and less representative. Maybe politicians should worry less about rigging laws for their own job security (re-election) and start worrying about the job security of their constituents.

Our ensuing exchange was...pretty lively. And I was glad to be able to add a link to O'Keefe's video to rebut his claim that "voter fraud is a red herring."

Percival
Joined
Mar '11
Percival

How exactly did being able to prove who you are become a race thing?  Are the airlines discriminating against people by requiring identification before issuing boarding passes?

EJHill
Joined
May '10
EJHill

My father passed away in 1976. He was still listed on the Ohio voter rolls the second time I voted for Reagan.

John Grant

 Whew.  I am glad to hear that vote fraud is not confined to Cook County--we wouldn't want to discriminate against the rest of the country!


Joined
May '11
Misha A.

Do these same critics of voter ID have a problem with ID checks for buying alcohol and cigarettes?  If not, do they really consider voting less important than the aforementioned activities?  

Give Me Liberty
Joined
Apr '11
Give Me Liberty
Percival: How exactly did being able to prove who you are become a race thing?  Are the airlines discriminating against people by requiring identification before issuing boarding passes? · Jan 11 at 3:21pm

Yes, flying is only for white people preferably, people with names like Chip and Buffy, or at least that is what I've learned from watching TV.

P.S. This is also true for renting cars, getting jobs, shopping in supermarkets, seeing a doctor...

Nathaniel Wright
Joined
Aug '10
Nathaniel Wright

When there is no research into the prevalence of voter fraud, it is easy to claim that it is a red herring.  Then again, the assertion that the intent is voter suppression is equally a red herring.  We do not live in 1920.  We are not passing Jim Crow laws where different people have different requirements in order to participate in the process.

The idea that presenting an ID is suppressive is on its face ridiculous, but some young people act as if a Professor or Teacher tells them it is suppressive then it is.  They need no evidence to back their non-falsifiable claim.  There is no evidence you can provide to convince them otherwise, because they aren't concerned with the actual effects of Voter ID laws.  Rather they are concerned with the "intent" behind them, and they "know" why you want voter ID laws.  It isn't so that you can ensure that all Caucus participants are eligible -- something Mrs. Clinton certainly wonders about those Nevada Caucuses -- oh no.  It is so you can make people go to DMV to get a free ID and get caught when it is discovered they are undocumented.


Joined
Apr '11
Daniel Warwick

 Its no coincidence that the deciding vote in the Supreme Court decision affirming voter identification laws was Justice John Paul Stevens -- a citizen of the great state of Illinois.

Mollie Hemingway, Ed.

I don't think people should be required to show state-issued identification to vote. But, then again, I'm leery of how much the state controls things through identification requirements to begin with.

Fricosis Guy
Joined
Jun '11
Fricosis Guy

Ah...I had been thinking on the ride home from work last night: "Boy, Romney's going to need O'Keefe and Breitbart vs. the Chicago Boys.  Where are they?"

Busy re-loading, apparently!

Diane Ellis, Ed.: James O'Keefe's Project Veritas has struck again
Pseudodionysius
Joined
Sep '10
Pseudodionysius
Mollie Hemingway, Ed.: I don't think people should be required to show state-issued identification to vote. But, then again, I'm leery of how much the state controls things through identification requirements to begin with. · Jan 11 at 5:38pm

I'd really like to have some role in the upcoming elections for President and, even though I'm Canadian, its encouraging to hear that in New Hampshire, Cook County and elsewhere that may no longer be an issue.

Huzzah!

Western Chauvinist
Joined
Dec '10
Western Chauvinist

Diane Ellis, Ed.: A college classmate of mine recently posted this image on his Facebook wall with the following caption.

There is a huge problem in America right now; young people aren’t voting. What’s worse is that many politicians know this, and make great efforts to keep it that way. They figure it’s easier to suppress student voters who tend to vote a certain way than to appeal to them with strong messages or good ideas. As far as we’re concerned this is the ultimate theft. It destroys our faith in the political system and makes our democracy less inclusive and less representative. Maybe politicians should worry less about rigging laws for their own job security (re-election) and start worrying about the job security of their constituents.

Our ensuing exchange was...pretty lively. And I was glad to be able to add a link to O'Keefe's video to rebut his claim that "voter fraud is a red herring." · 

Yer classmate is giving me the vapors, Diane. The results of the 2008 elections would indicate too many clueless gullible young people are voting! Vote buying by Obama forgiving student debt... not a huge problem?

BlueAnt
Joined
Aug '10
BlueAnt
Mollie Hemingway, Ed.: I don't think people should be required to show state-issued identification to vote. But, then again, I'm leery of how much the state controls things through identification requirements to begin with.

I'm generally against "requiring papers" for everyday tasks or basic common law freedoms.  The classic example is requiring ID or permits simply to move about the country and cross internal regional boundaries, thus restricting the natural right to freedom of movement.

But there are a few freedoms that translate into tangible government functions.  These functions are closely tied to specific, individual citizens.  You want to make sure a jury is composed of one's peers; you want to ensure someone running for office is who they claim to be; and you want to make sure only eligible voters in a district cast votes.

Producing ID for rare but structurally critical events like voting should be fine.  And I would argue voting has a double mandate for ID:  since democratic voting is the foundation of our nation's structure, any fraud in its execution weakens the legitimacy of the entire political system.

Misthiocracy
Joined
Aug '10
Misthiocracy

Pseudodionysius

Mollie Hemingway, Ed.: I don't think people should be required to show state-issued identification to vote. But, then again, I'm leery of how much the state controls things through identification requirements to begin with. · Jan 11 at 5:38pm

I'd really like to have some role in the upcoming elections for President and, even though I'm Canadian, its encouraging to hear that in New Hampshire, Cook County and elsewhere that may no longer be an issue.

In fact, you could probably vote in every primary, if yer cagey enough! 

wilber forge
Joined
Oct '10
wilber forge
Mollie Hemingway, Ed.: I don't think people should be required to show state-issued identification to vote. But, then again, I'm leery of how much the state controls things through identification requirements to begin with. · Jan 11 at 5:38pm

Then require proof of citizenship to vote.

Charlotte
Joined
Apr '11
Charlotte
Mollie Hemingway, Ed.: I don't think people should be required to show state-issued identification to vote. But, then again, I'm leery of how much the state controls things through identification requirements to begin with. · Jan 11 at 5:38pm

Mollie, just out of curiosity, why not? Is it the overall Big-Brotherness of it, or is there a more specific reason?

As an aside, for a time I was registered to vote in three different states simultaneously due to a succession of moves. Is that a record?

Sisyphus
Joined
Jul '10
Sisyphus
Mollie Hemingway, Ed.: I don't think people should be required to show state-issued identification to vote. But, then again, I'm leery of how much the state controls things through identification requirements to begin with. · Jan 11 at 5:38pm

I fully understand and somewhat share the sentiment, but the systematic abuse of the current flimsy system by fraudsters such as ACORN demands sterner measures. One person at a Tea Party event told me about a law enforcement briefing she received on the 2008 election and some of the methods used that were detected. She passionately urged the entire room to sign up for True the Vote and position themselves as observers before the usual suspects, the unions et. al., fill the slots early with their people, as they are inclined to do.

My polling place was asking for ID last November, and I was glad to see it.

The racism charge is the usual risible lie, in my experience it comes from the same folks that push the registration of prison inmates.

smp16
Joined
Jan '12
smp16

I'm a resident of a northern suburb of Chicago that's outside of Cook County, and when I vote in person (rather than absentee, which I've done a lot due to being at school), I'm always asked to show ID. I really don't get the argument against it. Until someone provides some solid evidence that asking for ID tramples on voters' liberties, I will continue to see it as whining that their side might lose out on some illegal votes.

outstripp
Joined
May '10
outstripp

I don't live in Japan any more, but when I hear stories like this and recall the Iowa vote counting snafu, I can hear (in my mind) Japanese saying, "Americans are incapable of doing anything well."  By well they mean without screwing up a little.  

Americans are tolerant of little mistakes, it is true, and sometimes that is the wise strategy, but sometimes I think they don't (or can't) take serious jobs seriously enough.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In