I am typically unimpressed with candidate match games, since they tend to be far too simplistic and only ask hot button issues. "Would you like to give poor Americans houses and hot meals and reality television, or would you like to make delicious soup from their bones?" And so on.
But this USA Today test is actually pretty well done I think. The ability to weight certain portions that matter, and diminish those that do not, is particularly worthwhile.
I'd encourage you all to take the test and share your results. In the interests of full disclosure, I'll go ahead and share how my graph came out.
I think I sense a problem for Willard in the general.