Jonathan Horn · September 13, 2012 at 4:17am

When Governor Romney called a press conference earlier today to discuss the attacks on the American embassy in Cairo and the the consulate in Benghazi, reporters lambasted the Republican nominee for injecting politics into a day of tragedy. So it's worth looking back just  one day earlier to see how our media overlords handled another sad day in our history -- the eleventh anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.

Americans woke up yesterday to see numerous mainstream outlets treating the shamefully revisionist claims in this article about 9/11, which even The New York Times ran in the op-ed section, as news. So much for being the arbiters of good taste.

Comments:


Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque

It was also yesterday, on the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 atrocities, that the President of the United States, Barack Obama, called in to a morning radio show in Miami hosted by "Pimp with a Limp" DJ Laz. This actually happened.

Aaron Miller
Joined
May '10
Aaron Miller

Let's also remember the Democrats' incessant calls for tolerance of Muslims after 9/11. This Administration's response to the embassy attacks should not have been a surprise to Republicans.

Melanie Graham

And I ask, who looked presidential today? No question it was Romney.


Joined
Apr '11
Essgee

Guess he will still be running against Bush till the day he loses....which of course will then be Bush's fault.

katievs
Joined
May '10
katievs

To call it a tragedy is an outrage.  This was a foreign policy moment calling for decisive leadership from the President.  We got none of it.  The American people have a right to learn how the opposing candidate views the situation and what he would have done differently.

It's the media who are shamefully "politicizing" events, by, instead of reporting them and searching for real answers, they are busy trying to twist the occasion into a "Romney steps in it" meme.  

I hope to God it won't fly with the public.

Mel Foil
Joined
Jun '10
Mel Foil

And if Romney kept silent, the mainstream press would say it's because he doesn't have enough experience to make an intelligent comment. If you can't win either way, you might as well just follow your heart.


Joined
Feb '11
david foster

After Germany invaded Poland in 1939, Neville Chamberlain was denounced in Parliament for his lack of action. LINK

I guess those who are objecting to Romney's stance would think, if they are consistent, that the MPs should have just shut up and saluted Chamberlain's policies.

concerned citizen
Joined
May '10
concerned citizen

Everyone remembers how Carter's fecklessness in 1980 contributed to his loss.  The MSM hacks know that this could bring their precious Obama down.  Hence the over-the-top response to Romney's statement.  They can't let the Republican get any advantage because of this.  Cannot let that happen!

Butters
Joined
May '11
Ningrim

Complaining about the media in the right echo chamber does no good.

Breitbart was preaching this before he died, but the media is enemy #1. Their biases have to be exposed. We need spies in their newsrooms, more hot mic episodes.

And the premises of their questions need to be politely challenged. Take a page from Newt.

It's depressing how easily and shamelessly they defined the narrative re: Cairo/Libya today (not sure how it played with the public but it's still disheartening). 

I'm sort of disappointed at the Breitbart folks and the James O'Keefes. They haven't done enough to carry on his spirit. We miss him desperately now.

KC Mulville
Joined
Jan '11
KC Mulville

Well, now, wait a minute, everyone. Romney shouldn't have interfered in the highly delicate diplomatic negotiations which are surely going on right now between our country and the leaders of Libya. 

Right.

They're trying to suggest that Mitt might make things worse, as if it isn't already SNAFU there already. 

I might be willing to buy the suggestion that we should speak with one voice and that the president should speak for all of us ... if he actually spoke for all of us, i.e., if he spoke at all. Instead, after being attacked, Obama issued an assurance that justice will be done, and then headed to Las Vegas for a fundraiser.

The Situation Room is thataway, Mr. President.

Bradley Ross
Joined
Feb '11
Bradley Ross
Stuart Creque: It was also yesterday, on the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 atrocities, that the President of the United States, Barack Obama, called in to a morning radio show in Miami hosted by "Pimp with a Limp" DJ Laz. This actually happened. · 2 hours ago

No, I'm told this was a prerecorded interview that was supposed to air on Monday. We can't fault Obama for this one.

genferei
Joined
Oct '10
genferei

MSM delenda est.

Charles Mark
Joined
Aug '10
Charles Mark

Surely in the immediate aftermath the primary focus-and not just for the media-should be on what security arrangements were put in place for a US Consulate in a volatile location on the anniversary of 9/11? 

Indaba
Joined
Apr '12
Indaba

The ability for viewers of MSM to find clips and post them online to illustrate hypocrisy will be the undoing of big media. It is the blogs that lifted the veil from my eyes. 

Butters
Joined
May '11
Ningrim
Indaba: The ability for viewers of MSM to find clips and post them online to illustrate hypocrisy will be the undoing of big media. It is the blogs that lifted the veil from my eyes.  · 4 minutes ago

it helps (and some reporters can be shamed), but you really need direct confrontation, otherwise they just try and ignore it

Chris Campion
Joined
Jul '11
Chris Campion

One of the ways the president can be forced to answer tough questions that he'd rather avoid is to hold press conferences.

We have press conferences with the president all the time, don't we?  We must.  He's the president.  He has to answer questions from the press pool, doesn't he?

Joseph Eagar
Joined
Oct '10
Joseph Eagar

Anyone have a link to an analysis of that article?  Google is producing a bunch of left-wing agitprop.  From my own reading, the article seems to fail from simple subjectivity--the author is using hearsay to exaggerate his claims, using anecdotes to reframe existing evidence as more damning.

Edited on September 13, 2012 at 5:25pm
Joseph Eagar
Joined
Oct '10
Joseph Eagar
Melanie Graham: And I ask, who looked presidential today? No question it was Romney. · 12 hours ago

I don't know.  Right now, I think Obama looks more presidential, mostly because the media is pushing that meme.  If we're lucky, in a few days voters will look back and think Romney and Obama were both equally "presidential," but that's about the most we can hope for.

Romney will need to be prepared for this to come up during the debates.

Chris Campion
Joined
Jul '11
Chris Campion

I can sum up Romney's debate response to anything Barry says when foreign policy comes up:

"How'd that "smart" diplomacy work out for our ambassador to Libya, chief?"

Jonathan Horn

Joseph, I recommend reading the 9/11 Commission Report.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In