The In Jerusalem magazine which comes with the Friday Jerusalem Post has a "round-up of city affairs" called "This Week in Jerusalem." This past Friday, there was an item which read as follows (link seems to require payment):

The Harry S. Truman Research Institute for the Advancement of Peace, which is part of the Hebrew University, has found a link between suicide bombers and financial distress.  According to the research findings, unemployment is a major factor that drives suicide bombers to implement their plans. Some people may have assumed that hatred was the cause, but it seems that unemployment and severe economic conditions are also behind the decision and the choice of targets in the attacks. The results of the research (on suicide bombers during 2002-2006) have been presented to the prime minister and the defense minister.

I was not able to find anything on this at the Truman Institute's website and thusfar they have not responded to my inquiry.

 The columnist told me she took this from a 2010 book called "Palestinian and Israeli Public Opinion" and I have not read the actual research findings.

Anyway, it seems to me that the "findings" that show financial distress as the cause (or even a cause) of suicide bombings, is risible on the face of it.  Consider:

We don't see suicide bombers coming from populations suffering financial distress, except as an Islamic political statement. 

The bombers always seem to detonate themselves among their political enemies, not say among the economic oppressors within their own brethren.

Perhaps the research findings can be supported if we consider that a suicide bomber's family receives financial support from the Palestinian Authority itself and its assorted accomplices.  But that is likely not cited by the research, because it would undermine their entire claim that there is no hate involved.

But I suppose we could assume that these findings were predetermined the moment the study was commissioned by an outfit with "Advancement of Peace" in its name.

Comments:


QuickerBrownFox
Joined
Oct '11
QuickerBrownFox

I haven't read much on it either, but I've always thought that suicide bomber characteristics would be tough to peg down. Not only can you not interview them after the fact, but there probably aren't very many of them. Between 2003 and 2010 there were about 1800 reported suicide bombings in Iraq, which is a lot, but still small relative to the terrorist population, which may be rather fluid, and especially the general population. It seems like it may be a group that's so independent, few changes in conditions would affect its behavior. It would be like identifying a characteristic about serial killers - say, abusing animals - and trying to solve the animal abuse problem with strong support from PETA. Like you said, it seems like they're digging for the evidence to their conclusion. But I sympathize with that wishful thinking: it would great to hit two birds with one stone, especially when one could be tied to prosperity. 

Edited on November 22, 2011 at 9:24am
Samuel Amaral
Joined
Oct '11
Samuel Amaral

These claim are always brought about because ''it makes sense'' and good emotional appeal, in fact isn't this part of the whole ''crime is a result of poverty'' excuse ?

Claire Berlinski, Ed.

I haven't looked at the research, but it's perfectly possible that there's an observable pattern that includes hatred and unemployment and x number of other variables. One doesn't preclude the other. Given that suicide bombers are committing suicide, you'd have to be determined not to ask the obvious questions to overrule, a priori, the idea that the traditional risk factors for suicide might be at play. Anything that can help form a more complete profile is probably useful. 

raycon and lindacon
Joined
Oct '10
raycon

Perhaps the correlation to prosperity mentioned by QBF can be traced by the decision of the Arab poohbahs, in 1948, to create a permanent "Palestinian" underclass.  The longest ongoing "refugee" situation ever is a deliberate creation of the oil wealthy sheikdoms, undoubtedly intended to bring about the level of desperation which could result in the suicide bomber creation.

Once found to be an effective terrorism tool for Islamists against the Jews, it has bred imitators of it's success.

As for the prosperity solution, it is not unlike the solution to the American poverty underclass.  And as with here, the poohbahs who control the situation will not willingly dispense with such a valuable tool. 

QuickerBrownFox
Joined
Oct '11
QuickerBrownFox

raycon

As for the prosperity solution, it is not unlike the solution to the American poverty underclass.  And as with here, the poohbahs who control the situation will not willingly dispense with such a valuable tool.

I didn't know that about the Arabs leaders. Not that this disproves anything - like Claire said, there are a lot of factors at work, and each person is different - but it's always amazed me when prosperous and successful people take up arms to become suicide bombers. When you look at ordinary suicide rates here in the U.S., you see a lot of people that aren't suffering all that much, but take that step. A while back a friend recommended a piece in Cosmo that discussed suicidal women in their early 20's. These kind, successful, and attractive women just had something missing in their lives.

I wonder the same about suicide bombers; maybe what moves a street fighting terrorist to become a suicide bomber isn't all that different than what turns a person suicidal in general. 

Edited on November 22, 2011 at 10:41pm
Brian Clendinen
Joined
Mar '11
Brian Clendinen

  One thought exercise to show how pathetic (and irrelevant) this argument/study is; take it to its logical conclusion with a different example. 

  I am sure the same result would arise in America with the Ku Klux Clan during the first half of the 20th century. What if the variable was white instead of Poor/Unemployed. Then one could argue based on the “study” that being white leads to racisms therefore reducing the number of whites in America would combat racism.

 

Edited on November 22, 2011 at 11:18pm
Paul A. Rahe

Brian Clendinen:   One thought exercise to show how pathetic (and irrelevant) this argument/study is; take it to its logical conclusion with a different example. 

  I am sure the same result would arise in America with the Ku Klux Clan during the first half of the 20th century. What if the variable was white instead of Poor/Unemployed. Then one could argue based on the “study” that being white leads to racisms therefore reducing the number of whites in America would combat racism.

  · Nov 22 at 2:17pm

Edited on Nov 22 at 02:18 pm

Yes, correlation is not causation.

Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque

 Whether they did so intentionally to obfuscate or unintentionally out of ignorance, it seems the people who performed the cited research confounded what motivates suicide bombing and what motivates a suicide bomber.

Suicide bombing is a tactic motivated by hate and by a willingness to use morally indefensible means toward a political end.

A suicide bomber -- an individual who straps on a bomb intending to blow himself and others up -- may have entirely different motivations from the individuals who planned the suicide bombing and provided the bomber with the explosives:

  • Suicidal depression
  • Social ostracism
  • Financial concerns for his/her family
  • Inability through youth or mental defect to understand what he/she is doing
  • A fervent desire to be famous among his/her peer group
  • Hatred of the targeted victims
  • Fanatic loyalty to the political cause of the bombing planners

It's truly inane to suppose that studying the motivations of individual suicide bombers will somehow lead to undermining the motivations behind the use of the tactic.

Grendel
Joined
Apr '11
Grendel
raycon: Perhaps the correlation to prosperity mentioned by QBF can be traced by the decision of the Arab poohbahs, in 1948, to create a permanent "Palestinian" underclass.  The longest ongoing "refugee" situation ever is a deliberate creation of the oil wealthy sheikdoms, undoubtedly intended to bring about the level of desperation which could result in the suicide bomber creation

The US has been suckered (or worse) into supporting this exercise in driving an entire people insane (I doubt even the Greeks had a name for it).  It pays nearly half of the budget of UNRWA (the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East).

One more thing the Liberal Fascists won't have to apologize for.

James Gawron
Joined
Dec '10
James Gawron
Claire Berlinski, Ed.: ... Anything that can help form a more complete profile is probably useful.  · Nov 22 at 5:32am

Claire, If wasting an immense amount of time on extremely weak statistical correlations obscures the fact that Islamic Jihadist Ideology produces Homicide/Suicide attacks then a great deal of damage has been done.  The microscopic amount of usefulness generated will be dwarfed by the obsenity of an Attorney General of the United States unable to make the one clear unequivocal correlation of Homicide/Suicide attacks to Jihadist psychosis.  In hard physical science, as opposed to social science, the correlation coefficient is often dispensed with entirely and a coefficient of determination is used instead.  In a few areas of social science such as transaction tracking in Economics the coefficient of determiniation is also used.  I would suggest that the linkage of Homicide/Suicide attacks to Jihadism is so strong that it to could be easily assessed by a coefficient of determination.

We are not Gd.  We do not have an infinite amount of time & money to do an infinite number of trivial studies on what we already have a clear handle.  Get a grip.

Judith Levy, Ed.

From CNNMOney:

First, to the question of poverty. ...Aren't the people who commit terrorist acts poor, even if they are from countries that are not? No. Remember, most of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 were middle-class sons of Saudi Arabia and many were well-educated. And Osama bin Laden himself is from one of the richest families in the Middle East.

But it goes deeper...a 2003 study in the Journal of Economic Perspectives...reported the results of a post-9/11 survey of Palestinians. Asked whether there were "any circumstances under which you would justify the use of terrorism to achieve political goals," the higher-status respondents (merchant, farmer or professional) were more likely to agree (43.3%) than those lower down the ladder (laborer, craftsman or employee) (34.6%). The higher-status respondents were also more likely to support armed attacks against Israeli targets (86.7% to 80.8%). The same dynamic existed when education was taken into account.

In another study, 129 Hezbollah militants who died in action were compared to the general Lebanese population. The Hezbollah members were slightly less likely to be poor, and significantly more likely to have finished high school.

Judith Levy, Ed.

More CNNMoney:

Efraim Benmelech of Harvard and Claude Berrebi of Rand..asked, in effect, what makes someone...a suicide bomber? Their answer: "Since there are returns to human capital in both the productive and...terror sectors, high-ability individuals will become suicide bombers if the expected payoff from suicide bombing is higher than their skill-adjusted expected lifetime earnings in the productive sector."

They test this proposition using a database of 148 Palestinian suicide bombers from 2000-05. And they find that older and more educated suicide bombers are assigned to higher-profile targets, kill more people, and are less likely to fail or be caught. In short, there is a match between human capital, in this grossly distorted sense, and the desired goal.

And as for the bombers themselves, [they] argue that the bombers have made, what is for them, a rational choice: There is enough moral, psychological and sometimes financial payoff from the act of killing many people to offset the economic loss of their death. Therefore, the terrorist manager assigns the most deadly tasks to the highest-caliber people; otherwise, they will not bother. In an awful way, it makes sense, and it seems to be true. 

Judith Levy, Ed.

There is a thread of belief among some analysts that it is a personal desire for revenge, rather than a frantic desire to escape a desperately poor existence, that motivates Palestinian suicide bombers. Here's Brendan O'Neill:

...while there were suicide bombings against the Israelis in Lebanon as early as 1982, the first suicide bombing by a Palestinian inside Israel proper did not occur until 1994...That attack was in revenge for the actions of Jewish extremist Baruch Goldstein, who shot dead 29 Arabs on a holy site in Hebron in February 1994. This suggests that suicide bombing came to the fore as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict became degraded, as it shifted, post-peace process, from being a national struggle between Israel and Palestine to being a squalid clash over patches of territory.

...today’s suicide bombers tend to be middle-class. According to a study from 2003, where one third of Palestinians live in poverty, only 13% of Palestinian suicide bombers lived in poverty; 57% of suicide bombers had been educated beyond high school compared with 15% of the general population.

Judith Levy, Ed.

And here's The Economist, basically tossing the Truman Institute's premise out the window:

Social scientists have collected a large amount of data on the socioeconomic background of terrorists. According to a 2008 survey of such studies by Alan Krueger of Princeton University, they have found little evidence that the typical terrorist is unusually poor or badly schooled. Claude Berrebi of the RAND Corporation compared the characteristics of suicide-bombers recruited by Hamas and Islamic Jihad from the West Bank and Gaza with those of the general adult male Palestinian population. Nearly 60% of suicide-bombers had more than a high-school education, compared with less than 15% of the general population. They were less than half as likely to come from an impoverished family as an average adult man from the general population. Mr Krueger carried out a similar exercise in Lebanon by collecting biographical information for Hizbullah militants. They too proved to be better educated and less likely to be from poor families than the general population of the Shia-dominated southern areas of Lebanon from which most came.

Judith Levy, Ed.

More from The Economist:

There is also no evidence that sympathy for terrorism is greater among deprived people. In a series of surveys carried out as part of the Pew Global Attitudes Project in 2004, adults in Jordan, Morocco, Pakistan and Turkey were asked whether they believed that suicide-bombing aimed at American or other Western targets in Iraq was justified. Their answers could be broken down by the respondents’ level of education. Although the proportions varied greatly between countries (with support lowest in Turkey), more schooling usually correlated with more agreement.

...the poorest countries, those with low literacy, or those whose economies were relatively stagnant did not produce more terrorists. When the analysis was restricted to suicide-attacks, there was a statistically significant pattern—but in the opposite direction. Citizens of the poorest countries were the least likely to commit a suicide-attack. The nationalities of all foreign insurgents captured in Iraq between April and October 2005 also produced no evidence that poorer countries produced more insurgents. If anything, there was weak evidence the other way.

Judith Levy, Ed.

So are economic conditions relevant to terrorism or not? Hit it, Economist:

Using data on all Palestinian suicide-attackers between 2000 and 2006, Esteban Klor of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and Messrs Benmelech and Berrebi show in a new paper that the skill level of the average terrorist rises when economic conditions are poor. They reckon that high unemployment enables terror organisations in Palestine to recruit more educated, mature terrorists. So better economic conditions could blunt the effectiveness of terror attacks by reducing the average quality of the talent that terrorist organisations are able to recruit.

But hold up. Lest we be tempted by this inference to hurl terror-avoidance economic sustainability packages at Gaza:

There are many reasons to promote economic development in poor countries but the elimination of terror is not a good one. The research on terrorists’ national origins suggested that countries which give their citizens fewer civil and political rights tend to produce more terrorists. Politics, not economics, is likely to be a more fruitful weapon in the fight against terror.

R. Craigen
Joined
Nov '10
R. Craigen

There might be a weak correlation.  But as you observe, suicide bombing and organized terror attacks like 9/11 are generally carried out by well-educated folks from reasonably comfortable families.  The poorest Islamic areas tend to have the least Islamic terrorism.  Consider the frequency with which muslim medical personnel in the west succumb to sudden jihad syndrome.  Bin Laden was a millionaire; Zawahiri, a successful medical doctor.  I fear that they had to waterboard the data to get a confession.

Judith Levy, Ed.

One of the details I remember hearing once about a suicide bomber after an attack was that she was a trained paramedic. The irony meter flies right off the charts here on a regular basis.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In