James Lileks · April 17, 2012 at 6:48pm

This would be a good day to remind you what fiscal conservatives were saying in 1941:

squander

The entire editorial, from Liberty magazine, is here. It's short and vigorous. Its author would weep today.

Comments:


David Nordmark
Joined
Nov '10
David Nordmark

I don't think its author would weep. More likely his head would explode :)

BlueAnt
Joined
Aug '10
BlueAnt

$90 billion of debt?  Pocket change.  That's how much this year's payroll tax extension added to the deficit all by itself.

It's how much the Department of Labor requested for one year's budget.

It's how much the deficit increased in 2009, to a total of $1.8 trillion.

It's the size of the individual state governments' budget gap for 2010.

It's roughly the size of the Department of Defense's war budget for 2013... in a year when we are nominally no longer at war.

It's surprising our poor, cash-strapped country hadn't starve to death back in 1941, what with spending only a miserly $47 billion over what we could afford to that point.

Edited on April 17, 2012 at 7:31pm

Joined
Dec '11
Guruforhire

in 2010 dollars that is

$1,317,600,000,000

Valiuth
Joined
Apr '11
Valiuth

The lean times he speaks of for Americans did come, yet government spending ballooned in the next few years...and probably would have done so regardless as in six months the US would be drawn into the largest conflict in human history. 

Severely Ltd.
Joined
Oct '10
Severely Ltd.

I'm with Blue Ant, what's this guy complaining for. What a whiner. what a milksop. Come forward in history, ya editorial wimp, and shoulder some real debt.

Sam Johnson said we need to be reminded more than we need to be instructed, and in that spirit I repeat the following for perspective:

One million seconds is eleven days. One billion seconds is 33 years. One trillion seconds is thirty three thousand years. Now we're talking some numbers.

tabula rasa
Joined
Jun '10
tabula rasa

Reminds me of Dr. Evil, after being frozen (or whatever) for a couple of decades, holding the world ransom for "One Mil-li-on Dollars."

Joseph Eagar
Joined
Oct '10
Joseph Eagar

Was the debt milder then?  I know World War II ended with a higher debt level (relative to output) then today, but I don't know what it was in 1941.

Leporello
Joined
Feb '12
Leporello

Who cares about the author?  I'M weeping today.

Great piece.  Should be issued as a Romney campaign press release with minimal updating.

Severely Ltd.
Joined
Oct '10
Severely Ltd.
Joseph Eagar: Was the debt milder then?  I know World War II ended with a higher debt level (relative to output) then today, but I don't know what it was in 1941. · 3 minutes ago

If you mean the amount of debt per worker, I wonder if any period touches current levels. The current Workers-to-takers ratio is not healthy.

Percival
Joined
Mar '11
Percival

We are accruing $47 billion dollars of additional debt every 13 days, assuming it is growing at $150 million an hour.  That would bake the author's noodle right there: one five zero, zero zero zero, zero zero zero -- every hour.

DocJay
Joined
Jul '11
DocJay

90 billion just about covers the first lady's wardrobe.

Joseph Eagar
Joined
Oct '10
Joseph Eagar

Severely Ltd.

Joseph Eagar: Was the debt milder then?  I know World War II ended with a higher debt level (relative to output) then today, but I don't know what it was in 1941. · 3 minutes ago

If you mean the amount of debt per worker, I wonder if any period touches current levels. The current Workers-to-takers ratio is not healthy. · 12 minutes ago

What matters is the percentage relative to output (GDP).  Workers-to-takers ratios do not change today's burden of today's stock of debt.  It does affect today's tax burden, however.

Foxfier
Joined
Apr '12
Foxfier

Guruforhire: in 2010 dollars that is

$1,317,600,000,000 · 3 hours ago

Thank you, I was curious.

flownover
Joined
Aug '10
flownover

Gurutoo bad your calculation equals 1/10 th of the reality

Give Me Liberty
Joined
Apr '11
Give Me Liberty

Ironically, Mr. Jones was a New Deal Democrat!

He gets a lot of credit for the policies that steered the nation through the Depression.  He is, in some way, responsible for us being on the path we are on.  Of course, Democrats and some Republicans have gone nuts with with our budgets in the intervening years.

Jesse H. Jones with FDR
Neolibertarian
Joined
Apr '12
Neolibertarian
Give Me Liberty: Ironically, Mr. Jones was a New Deal Democrat!

Conservatism wasn't wasn't a counter-argument to liberalism before Bill Buckley, of course. Back in those days, corporatism was the counter-argument to the New Deal.

Reminds me of Father Charles Coughlin, another non-conservative FDR critic.

http://archive.org/details/Father_Coughlin

At any rate, how can you not love phrasing like this:

"...If all the flummery and flapdoodle of boondoggling had not happened and we had used that 22 billions...to buy ourselves battleships, tanks and planes, we would not stand where we stand today, unprepared, disorganized..."

Beautiful.

Thank you Mr. Lileks!


Joined
Dec '11
Guruforhire
flownover: Gurutoo bad your calculation equals 1/10 th of the reality · 8 hours ago

??

A dollar in 1941 is worth 14.64 2010 dollars.  Thus 90 Billion is 1317.6 billion.  or 1.3176 Trillion.

It is less than 10 percent of our modern debt.  Which is scary.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In