Peter Robinson · February 20, 2012 at 3:44am
lin

David Brooks in "The Jeremy Lin Problem," his column this past Friday--yes, I'm about 72 hours behind in my reading:

[Jeremy Lin is] a Harvard grad in the N.B.A., an Asian-American man in professional sports. But we shouldn’t neglect the biggest anomaly. He’s a religious person in professional sports.

The ethos of sports, David argues, is "in tension" with the ethos of religion.

The moral universe of modern sport is oriented around victory and supremacy. The sports hero tries to perform great deeds in order to win glory and fame. It doesn’t really matter whether he has good intentions. His job is to beat his opponents and avoid the oblivion that goes with defeat....

Ascent in the sports universe is a straight shot. You set your goal, and you climb toward greatness. But ascent in the religious universe often proceeds by a series of inversions: You have to be willing to lose yourself in order to find yourself; to gain everything you have to be willing to give up everything; the last shall be first; it’s not about you.

For many religious teachers, humility is the primary virtue. You achieve loftiness of spirit by performing the most menial services....You achieve your identity through self-effacement. You achieve strength by acknowledging your weaknesses.

Sports and religion, in permanent conflict.

This doesn't strike me as quite right, but, I have to confess, it doesn't strike me altogether mistaken, either.

You?

Comments:



Joined
Jan '11
Anon

Mollie Hemingway, Ed.

Anon: Raconteur:

We are all imperfect. I am astonished and disappointed that here on Ricochet somebody like David Brooks can be called a "doofus." That is, in my humble opinion, disgraceful. Has anybody on Ricochet called Mitt Romney-- who is far to the left of David Brooks-- a doofus?

As to that,  let me just say that you have pointed out the problem of being misunderstood when phrasing politely, as in numerous cases here on Ricochet, so allow me to be more direct: Romney is a doofus. · 20 minutes ago

Come on, really? Let's elevate the discourse a bit. There are much more interesting and even elucidating ways to discuss what we think about columnists and political candidates. · 26 minutes ago

Good grief, you missed the point, Mollie.  But, perhaps you're right to chastise me; perhaps in these times it is best to obfuscate by polite phrasing.  However, doofus really is a perfectly acceptable descriptive term.  Certainly, terms of the four-letter variety, and their near cousins, should be off limits in polite society,  but doofus?  Come on. 

Instugator
Joined
Aug '10
Instugator
Raconteur: Every conservative that I know (and I know some very important and prominent conservatives) has ideological "soft spots"-- areas where they are willing to bend or compromise their conservative principles a bit. As far as I can tell, David has fewer "soft spots" than a lot of people who call themselves "conservative."

Well, we knew that one of David Brook's soft spots was haberdashery.

Now we know his soft spots  include faith as well.

Mollie Hemingway, Ed.

Anon

Mollie Hemingway, Ed.

Come on, really? Let's elevate the discourse a bit. There are much more interesting and even elucidating ways to discuss what we think about columnists and political candidates. · 26 minutes ago

Good grief, you missed the point, Mollie.  But, perhaps you're right to chastise me; perhaps in these times it is best to obfuscate by polite phrasing.  However, doofus really is a perfectly acceptable descriptive term.  Certainly, terms of the four-letter variety, and their near cousins, should be off limits in polite society,  but doofus?  Come on.  · 19 minutes ago

Well, no one would confuse me for a Romney supporter (or a Brooks fan) but I think we can do better than calling people stupid. We can say what we don't like about someone's policies or arguments without calling them names, right? We're heading into a very heated time for politics and I think it serves us well for a conversation site, particularly one where not everyone agrees on Romney or other candidates.

ManBearPig
Joined
May '10
Ryan Gaines

One of the many cliches in sports interviews is that the star of the winning team thanks God in the post-game interview. It is indeed a time honored tradition, and on that was rarely even questioned until Tim Tebow came along... Here is comedian Jeff Stilson on that topic:

"I’m trying to wean myself off sports, it’s too time consuming. I don’t watch football anymore, I gave that up. I got tired of the interviews after the games, because the winning players always give credit to God, and the losers blame themselves. You know, just once I’d like to hear a player say, “Yeah, we were in the game, until Jesus made me fumble. He hates our team.”"

Mothership_Greg
Joined
Nov '11
Mothership_Greg

Western Chauvinist: 

Faith and life are paradoxical, not irreconcilable. If Mr. Brooks had read even a little Chesterton, he might understand that. Here's an instructive example: David Brooks is intelligent, sometimes witty, and a gifted writer.  He is simultaneously unwise. · 6 hours ago

Amen to that. I think David Brooks is a nice guy, but the muddleheadedness of his thought is quite frequently deserving of mockery.  I'm guessing he's been exposed to the radiation of Friedmanium for too long, what with all the poor analogies and construction of imaginary conflicts (with the occasional hint of self-congratulation at his own cleverness).

It is perhaps high praise to call David Brooks a nice guy, since all that peer pressure at the NYT must be an awful burden.

Jerry Broaddus
Joined
Dec '10
Jerry Broaddus

It's good to know that David Brooks is confused about more than just politics.


Joined
Feb '12
Marilyn Odland

The Exemplar of Chritianity said of himself, "I can of mine own self do nothing."  Then he went out and did everything! True humility is not weakness in any endeavor.


Joined
Apr '11
Random Value

An article on Brooks's column from one of my absolute favorite writers online.

Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque
Random Value: An article on Brooks's column from one of my absolute favorite writers online. · 26 minutes ago

Thank you for that link.

Duane Oyen
Joined
May '10
Duane Oyen

I do think it is difficult for world class leaders at whatever to leave the ego behind and do "whatsover ye do, do it heartily as to the Lord and not unto men."

"Difficult" is not the same as "impossible".

Susan in Seattle
Joined
Apr '11
Susan in Seattle

Perhaps a better title for this should be "The David Brooks Problem."

Western Chauvinist
Joined
Dec '10
Western Chauvinist
Random Value: An article on Brooks's column from one of my absolute favorite writers online. · 22 hours ago

That's a hoot! Thanks for linking.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In