USAID is the program started in 1961 by President Kennedy that provides money for development and humanitarian efforts in other countries.   Winning of hearts and minds.

But are we winning hearts and minds?  The answer is no according to a recent Pew Research poll that finds despite Arab Spring, Middle Eastern attitudes toward both the United States and President Obama remain poor.

It’s not easy to determine exactly how much USAID spends because its budgeting seems to get tied with other budgets.  Best I can tell, it spends $Billions per year.  About 2.6% of America’s discretionary budget spending is on foreign aid.

Below is a list of areas USAID funded over the past 5 quarters.  It appears to me that “Counter-Terrorism” should be higher than #24.  Health seems to be in the appropriate spot at number 1.  Are there other areas that seem out of place, or that are not important enough for us to be funding at all while se struggle to pay our own bills?

Obligations by Program Areas for FY 2010 & FY 2011 thru 3/31

  Program Area FY 2010 FY 2011
1 3.1 - Health 5,946,790,654 559,804,325
2 5.1 - Protection, Assistance and Solutions 2,672,184,444 728,581,901
3 3.2 - Education 1,133,254,664 56,487,744
4 4.4 - Infrastructure 1,073,873,676 69,966,996
5 4.5 - Agriculture 1,005,876,872 103,190,235
6 2.2 - Good Governance 1,018,340,191 55,522,405
7 3.3 - Soc. & Econ Services & Protection for Vulnerable Populations 698,371,132 169,742,214
8 4.3 - Financial Sector 827,837,698  
9 6.2 - Administration and Oversight 628,796,374 86,180,828
10 1.6 - Conflict Mitigation and Reconciliation 495,207,296 76,673,672
11 4.6 - Private Sector Competitiveness 549,655,107 20,985,729
12 1.4 - Counter-Narcotics 425,882,443 8,158,999
13 4.8 - Environment 370,673,295 56,849,951
14 2.4 - Civil Society 383,573,060 26,055,747
15 2.1 - Rule of Law and Human Rights 271,917,838 19,008,227
16 2.3 - Political Competition and Consensus-Building 237,141,602 40,471,727
17 4.7 - Economic Opportunity 247,971,929 28,990,115
18 4.1 - Macroeconomic Foundation for Growth 248,917,156 22,486,147
19 6.1 - Program Design and Learning 184,114,064 9,581,732
20 4.2 - Trade and Investment 162,952,106 7,559,431
21 5.2 - Disaster Readiness 62,298,134 16,059,107
22 4.3 - Financial Sector Capacity 68,547,733  
23 1.3 - Stabilization Operations and Security Sector Reform 50,557,717 6,028,527
24 1.1 - Counter-Terrorism 35,474,845 -7,068
25 4.3 - Financial Sector 9,985,185 14,874,060
  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

Talleyrand
Joined
May '10
Talleyrand

Duplicate

Edited on Jul 23, 2011 at 11:23am
Talleyrand
Joined
May '10
Talleyrand
"11 4.6 - Private Sector Competitiveness" - $550M

 Because only government can really sponsor that activity.

Sweet J_sus, the bureaucracy springs eternal on any ground it is yielded.

Edited on Jul 23, 2011 at 11:24am

Joined
Sep '10
kylez

yes, but we should cut it just because we feel like it. we don't need a reason. looks like counter-narcotics and counter-terrorism have some use, but i'll bet "environment" is a horrible waste. looks like we are getting a sweet deal on "counter-terrorism" in comparison to "health".

which category does the pakistani sesame street fit into? "education"?

what a mind-boggling waste of our money.

Chris Deleon
Joined
May '10
Chris Deleon

It's a concern, and should be addressed, but cutting off foreign aid certainly won't close the budget gap for us.  I'd say we focus on entitlements first, as hard as that fight is going to be.  And that part is "mandatory" which is really where the meat of the problem lies.

Claire Berlinski, Ed.

I'm sure not liking the vagueness of "Protection, assistance and solutions." Anyone have any idea what that's even supposed to mean?

(Yes, I could look it up--but I just want to point out that before you assign that much money to any program, you should call it something that doesn't compass any imaginable use of funds. Or else you should call it what it is--"discretionary.")

Tommy De Seno

 I'm not sure why "counter-terrorism" is listed with a negative number for 2011.  Did someone pay us back?

Douglas
Joined
Mar '11
Douglas

There are several amendments to the Constitution I've long wanted to be voted on. One of them is an amendment stating that no monetary gift or loan could be made to a foreign government or NGO or UN agency in a fiscal year where the budget is in deficit. Considering that through most of our history we've run a deficit, that would pretty much take care of that problem.

The money involved, in the great scheme of things, is nothing compared to entitlements or defense spending. But I think the principle is important.

The King Prawn
Joined
Dec '10
The King Prawn

Short answer, yes. Long answer, yes, of course. The world needs to stop having a kegger on our credit card.

Edited on Jul 23, 2011 at 1:38pm
flownover
Joined
Aug '10
flownover

This was never about cutting expenses. All he wants is higher taxes, the noise is just cover.

Sisyphus
Joined
Jul '10
Sisyphus

All of these obligations should be reviewed in light of the budget issues, the level of obligation, and the specific relationships affected. Zeroing the rows without review will lead to some ugly unforced errors.


Joined
Jun '11
michael kelley

Just cut them.  If we don't, the paper market will.

cdor
Joined
Jun '10
cdor

CUT!! Why? When? What for? What about the children...and grandma! You guys are crazy. Heck even the credit agencies are telling us to borrow more. Can't you people read?

Jimmy Carter
Joined
Jul '10
Jimmy Carter

All these, um, obligations should be reviewed in light of The Constitution.


Joined
Jun '11
michael kelley

Just cut them.  If we don't, the paper market will.

Douglas
Joined
Mar '11
Douglas
Jimmy Carter: All these, um, obligations should be reviewed in light of The Constitution. · Jul 23 at 4:23pm

I've come to the reluctant, sad conclusion that the Constitution is irrelevant, and has been for quite some time. It is with great sadness that I've realized that we'd have an easier time scrapping it and writing a new one than we would getting people to abide by the old one.

Jimmy Carter
Joined
Jul '10
Jimmy Carter

Douglas

 

 It is with great sadness that I've realized that we'd have an easier time scrapping it and writing a new one than we would getting people to abide by the old one. · Jul 23 at 9:07pm

What would the "new one" state?

Douglas
Joined
Mar '11
Douglas

Jimmy Carter

What would the "new one" state? · Jul 23 at 9:31pm

Well, it would almost certainly have a right to entitlements in it.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In