I am not a fan of the town hall format for debates. The people never seem real. The questions are either obvious, leading or stupid. I've seen worse than last night's, though.

Still, there was that one question asked by one "Catherine Fenton":

In what new ways to you intend to rectify the inequalities in the workplace, specifically regarding females making only 72 percent of what their male counterparts earn?

First off, the premise of the question was wrong. It's not true that women make only 72 percent of what their male counterparts earn. Not even close.

These questions were vetted, so I wonder how a question with such a blatantly false premise was even permitted.

But if The Volokh Conspiracy blog is correct, vetting may not have been a strong suit of this debate:

By a strange coincidence, there happens to be a Catherine Fenton who in 2008 identified herself as the Media Coordinator of CodePink Long Island.

I mean, really. Horrible question either way, but if true, I can't think of a better example of how silly the myth of the "undecided voter" is. Volokh goes on to say, "CNN admitted that almost all of the audience had voted for Obama in 2008." I guess most undecided voters would fit in that category, but perhaps some additional balance is needed.

Update: A commenter below notes that Volokh is still looking into it but thinks that the Code Pink media coordinator Felton and this Felton might just happen to share a name as opposed to being the same person.

Comments:


Eeyore
Joined
Jun '10
Eeyore

"These questions were vetted"

Dearest Mollie, the questions were vetted by...Candy Crowley.

Can I get a "Q.E.D."!?

Flapjack
Joined
Dec '11
Flapjack

The whole townhall format is preposterous, in my opinion.  I'm reminded of company meetings during which everyone has to listen to "here's my special case" blatherings.  I made more sense out of Don Quixote, which I read while semi-listening to the debate.

Paladin
Joined
Oct '10
Robert McKay

That question was pretty asinine, but I won't complain too much about the vetting because Mitt Romney got a chance to explain how he is different from President Bush, got to address what he thought was the biggest misconception about him, and someone asked the president "Mr. President, I voted for you in 2008. What have you done or accomplished to earn my vote in 2012? I'm not that optimistic as I was in 2012. Most things I need for everyday living are very expensive."

If Romney was weak on a few questions and missed some opportunities that is on him, but the format and the questions certainly gave him multiple chances to deal serious blows to President Obama. Accepting the media is heavily biased against conservatives I think I can shrug off code-pink lady since we had someone ask basically how is he better off than four years ago.

Edited on October 17, 2012 at 6:48am
Mollie Hemingway, Ed.
Robert McKay: That question was pretty asinine, but I won't complain too much about the vetting because Mitt Romney got a chance to explain how he is different from President Bush, got to address what he thought was the biggest misconception about him, and someone asked the president "Mr. President, I voted for you in 2008. What have you done or accomplished to earn my vote in 2012? I'm not that optimistic as I was in 2012. Most things I need for everyday living are very expensive."

But only one question was based on something that wasn't true. The others are reasonable.

What if one of the questions began, "As we all know, Barack Obama was born in Kenya." I mean, false premises should be disallowed.

KC Mulville
Joined
Jan '11
KC Mulville

I completely agree that undecideds are a myth. They've already made their decisions, but (for those who aren't simply lying) they just aren't ready to commit. They have no intention of changing their minds, but they won't formally commit until the last minute. 

I'd have challenged the premise of the question. I don't think the Constitution gives government the right to "rectify" inequalities in the workplace, unless those inequalities are the result of misbehavior. On the other hand, I liked Mitt's answer about work flexibility for women and families - but more as a matter of using the bully pulpit, not as a heavy-handed intrusion into the way private companies run their own business. 

Karen
Joined
May '10
Karen

I did like Romney's answer. I think it's true that business owners need to make the workplace more flexible for women, particularly working moms. I wish he made a point that the federal workforce has little workplace flexibility due to the public sector unions, but that might've been too far in the weeds.  I think the "binder full of women" line was a little ridiculous. 

Paladin
Joined
Oct '10
Robert McKay

Mollie Hemingway, Ed.

Robert McKay: That question was pretty asinine, but I won't complain too much about the vetting because Mitt Romney got a chance to explain how he is different from President Bush, got to address what he thought was the biggest misconception about him, and someone asked the president "Mr. President, I voted for you in 2008. What have you done or accomplished to earn my vote in 2012? I'm not that optimistic as I was in 2012. Most things I need for everyday living are very expensive."

But only one question was based on something that wasn't true. The others are reasonable.

What if one of the questions began, "As we all know, Barack Obama was born in Kenya." I mean, false premises should be disallowed. · 2 minutes ago

You make a good point, but I have a follow-up question: if the question is based on a false premise, but that premise is widely believed to be true, shouldn't we just let them ask it and hope our guy has access to the facts and can show the premise to be false?

Mollie Hemingway, Ed.

Robert McKay

You make a good point, but I have a follow-up question: if the question is based on a false premise, but that premise is widely believed to be true, shouldn't we just let them ask it and hope our guy has access to the facts and can show the premise to be false? · 1 minute ago

Good point. Yes.

So interesting that in this debate we're told that Candy Crowley was the world's most amazing "fact-checker," and yet she flubbed her fact-check of Obama's Libya remarks, failed to fact-check Obama's lie that Planned Parenthood does mammograms and failed to fact-check this question. (I'm sure there are many others)

Trace
Joined
May '10
Trace Urdan

My Facebook feed is exploding with the "binders full of women" meme that was part of Romney's response to that question. No one I know seems to care about Libya but they are beside themselves over the notion that this (very slight) mis-speak is clear evidence that Romney is a sexist boob.

Cutlass
Joined
Apr '11
Cutlass

Maybe the first debate spoiled me, but I was excited to hear the question because for once I thought we had a conservative articulate enough to confront that premise. I understand that Romney was playing it safe - and I doubt he was prepped for it - but what would have happened had he explained the unequal pay fallacy? Explain that the statistics are meaningless because they're skewed by women who often have family obligations? Explain that in some urban areas young working women actually make twice as much as men?

I suppose if not phrased perfectly it could be twisted into a "barefoot and pregnant" soundbite by the left. So, maybe it was a smart move. 

Still, to actually debunk this obnoxious leftist canard for a national audience would have been so satisfying. 

Cutlass
Joined
Apr '11
Cutlass
Karen: I did like Romney's answer. I think it's true that business owners need to make the workplace more flexible for women, particularly working moms. I wish he made a point that the federal workforce has little workplace flexibility due to the public sector unions, but that might've been too far in the weeds.  I think the "binder full of women" line was a little ridiculous.  · 14 minutes ago

That's an excellent point, but yeah, it might be too complex.

I heard some leftist on the radio characterize Romney's answer as sexist because he said he tried to help women get back home to the kitchen.

So, it doesn't matter. If Romney said he pushed for paid maternity leave it would be sexist.

Cutlass
Joined
Apr '11
Cutlass

I mean, really. Horrible question either way, but if true, I can't think of a better example of how silly the myth of the "undecided voter" is. Volokh goes on to say, "CNN admitted that almost all of the audience had voted for Obama in 2008." I guess most undecided voters would fit in that category, but perhaps some additional balance is needed.

Oh, the whole thing is a joke. At least hold the "undecided" voters debate in a swing state. Could you imagine Obama agreeing to a debate involving only undecideds in Wyoming? 

Joseph Stanko
Joined
Jun '10
Joseph Stanko

Cutlass

I heard some leftist on the radio characterize Romney's answer as sexist because he said he tried to help women get back home to the kitchen.

So, it doesn't matter. If Romney said he pushed for paid maternity leave it would be sexist. · 6 minutes ago

That's nothing, one of the "undecided" voters on the Frank Luntz panel said of Romney: "We can't have a slick guy coming in to office who, based on his belief system, doesn't even believe women should work outside the home."

That's why I find it hard to believe these debates really change that many minds.  People will hear what they want to hear, what they expected to hear, regardless of what was actually said.

Nathaniel Wright
Joined
Aug '10
Nathaniel Wright

Did you notice that the woman who asked the "how will you be different from W" question walked up and chatted with Romney after the debate?

Wylee Coyote
Joined
Jul '10
Wylee Coyote

Volokh is saying now that the Fenton from the debate is probably too young to be the same one from CodePink.

Crow's Nest
Joined
Mar '11
Crow's Nest

I think the townhall format has its virtues, but they are mostly restricted to races for state and local offices--Congressmen and Senators should certainly hold them.

But one of the virtues is the spontaneous interaction of the candidates with the voters. Yes, this style of interaction is messy, but it is direct. On the local level, people know who the 'activists' are, and shout them down if necessary. Manners and informal checks, rather than heavy-handed national media vetting, are the tools of choice to control the local townhall.

In a Presidential race, limited to three debates, and given our media ecosystem today. I think the format has exhasuted its usefulness. If the questions are vetted in advance, something of the organic experience of hearing what's on the voters minds is lost--as soon as the questions are vetted this happens regardless if it is done well or poorly. But especially if the questions are vetted badly, or in the farcical case where a Code Pink activist is given a speaking slot, the loser is the average voter.

Nick Stuart
Joined
May '10
Nick Stuart

Not true, but there's been a poster from the State of Illinois proclaiming the "Women earn 72%..." canard in every workplace I've been in for the last 20 years.

Mel Foil
Joined
Jun '10
Mel Foil

Right now, I expect there's a big demand for petroleum engineers in places like North Dakota. So, what's required to take advantage of that opportunity? You need the right engineering degree, some experience, and you need the freedom to drop everything else and move to North Dakota. Look at the people prepared to do that, and the vast majority of them will be men. It's not their fault that very few women are prepared.

Indaba
Joined
Apr '12
Indaba
Mel Foil: Right now, I expect there's a big demand for petroleum engineers in places like North Dakota. So, what's required to take advantage of that opportunity? You need the right engineering degree, some experience, and you need the freedom to drop everything else and move to North Dakota. Look at the people prepared to do that, and the vast majority of them will be men. It's not their fault that very few women are prepared. · 6 minutes ago

I hired for a construction firm and they wanted a senior female in management. We begged women and offered 25% more salary but none of them wanted the job. I actively work to get women up the ladder. There are impressive women but women do have a preference for a city job.


Joined
Sep '10
liberal jim
Mollie Hemingway, Ed.: I am not a fan of the town hall format for debates. The people never seem real. The questions are either obvious, leading or stupid. 

Seems to me the questioners might have a bright future in journalism!

Eighty questioners, 11 questions asked, the journalist moderator  picks the questions;  obviously the problem must lie with the ordinary people asking the questions and not the elite professional journalists who routinely ask obvious, leading or stupid questions.  I think not!  Did it ever occur to you that having a debate without one of these parasitic  professionals involved might dramatically improve the process.  


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In