Diane Ellis · April 6, 2012 at 1:04am

Shelby Steele's Wall Street Journal essay on the exploitation of Trayvon Martin is both moving and powerful.  Moving because Dr. Steele, a man who grew up in segregation and who himself was no stranger to wounding racism, has throughout his career as a writer refused to play the role of the aggrieved victim, a role that as been assigned to people who share the hue of his skin by the likes of the Reverends Sharpton,  Jackson, and Wright.   And the essay is especially powerful because Dr. Steele is courageous in contrasting what he calls the "poetic truth" —an ennobling narrative propagated by the civil rights establishment and mainstream media that sees racial injustice and inequality as among America's defining traits—with the ugly and  lamentable actual truth.  Dr. Steele writes,

...Trayvon's sad fate clearly sent a quiver of perverse happiness all across America's civil rights establishment, and throughout the mainstream media as well. His death was vindication of the "poetic truth" that these establishments live by. Poetic truth is like poetic license where one breaks grammatical rules for effect. Better to break the rule than lose the effect. Poetic truth lies just a little; it bends the actual truth in order to highlight what it believes is a larger and more important truth.

The civil rights community and the liberal media live by the poetic truth that America is still a reflexively racist society, and that this remains the great barrier to black equality. But this "truth" has a lot of lie in it. America has greatly evolved since the 1960s. There are no longer any respectable advocates of racial segregation. And blacks today are nine times more likely to be killed by other blacks than by whites.

If Trayvon Martin was a victim of white racism (hard to conceive since the shooter is apparently Hispanic), his murder would be an anomaly, not a commonplace. It would be a bizarre exception to the way so many young black males are murdered today. If there must be a generalization in all this—a call "to turn the moment into a movement"—it would have to be a movement against blacks who kill other blacks. The absurdity of Messrs. Jackson and Sharpton is that they want to make a movement out of an anomaly. Black teenagers today are afraid of other black teenagers, not whites.

These are things which many of us might think to ourselves and utter in private to a friend, but would never have the guts to broadcast. We –and I speak particularly of my own generational cohort here–have been trained to see a fact like the homicide rate among blacks as inherently racist.  It's as though certain facts are too ugly, too offensive to ever speak out loud.

So perhaps it should be no surprise that the first comment I received upon posting a link to Shelby Steele's essay on Facebook was from a young woman who decried it as a "racist essay."

Comments:


Tom Lindholtz
Joined
May '10
Tom Lindholtz

That is why it is so crucial to have messages like this come from people who are themselves Black.  In a rational world it wouldn't matter the color of the skin of a speaker.  It would only matter the truth of his words.  But we do not live in a rational world.  And so it is important to have truthful messengers who can bring truth to people regardless of their own prejudices.

Kervinlee
Joined
May '10
Kervinlee

I was mightily impressed with that column; I forward it along to selected friends. Dr. Steele always seems to be able to see right to the bottom of things -  "White Guilt" was a very great book. In 2007, I think, he wrote a very astute piece in the WSJ on the 50th anniversary of the Little Rock Nine. His thesis in that piece was that that event was the death knell of white supremacy - a doctrine that was then widely accepted by both white and black - its ignorance stood completely exposed and discredited as television brought for all to see, in the U.S. and the rest of the world, the folly of racial segregation. White supremacy had been shamed to death.

I always look forward to Dr. Steele's insights; I wish his work would appear more often.

G.A. Dean
Joined
May '10
G.A. Dean

Dr. Steele, with typical insight, points to the broader tragedy of this incident in his penultimate paragraph. By adopting a "group identity" based on racial distinction and victimization, rather than "common humanity", the black political culture has painted itself and black Americans into a corner. There can be no escape from an identity based on continual victim-hood, and a "poetic truth" cannot be overcome and reversed by actual progress in racial relations. Any victories will be as poetic as the "truths".

flownover
Joined
Aug '10
flownover

Diane,

A perversion of Pavlov in your training racism sublimation to knee jerk self-indict ?

Do you think it was the TV zeitgeist ? That Fonz did this to you ?

Shelby Steele is still right in my mind that Obama would never get elected, he didn't see the country get stoned on benefits , victimology , and an array of diversions that left a big backdoor open and the light on.

Edited on April 6, 2012 at 2:18am
tabula rasa
Joined
Jun '10
tabula rasa

I can't really put into words how much I admire men like Shelby Steele, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, and Allen West, black men who combine intelligence and bravery in order to confront and expose the racialist garbage that men like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton spew.

I am always amazed at how calm they remain in the face of the criticisms they take from the Jacksons and Sharptons (though Congressman West is good at genuine righteous indignation at the proper moments).

flownover
Joined
Aug '10
flownover

Tabula

And Justice Thomas remains silent .
What a rock he is .
These papier- mache weathervane felons can't lose credibility as their cred is proved up on terms we don't care to ken.

Edited on April 6, 2012 at 2:45am
Give Me Liberty
Joined
Apr '11
Give Me Liberty

He nails the true tragedy of the post Civil Rights movement.

And this points to the second tragedy that Trayvon's sad demise highlights. Before the 1960s the black American identity (though no one ever used the word) was based on our common humanity, on the idea that race was always an artificial and exploitive division between people. After the '60s—in a society guilty for its long abuse of us—we took our historical victimization as the central theme of our group identity. We could not have made a worse mistake.

It has given us a generation of ambulance-chasing leaders, and the illusion that our greatest power lies in the manipulation of white guilt. The tragedy surrounding Trayvon's death is not in the possibility that it might have something to do with white racism; the tragedy is in the lustfulness with which so many black leaders, in conjunction with the media, have leapt to exploit his demise for their own power.

Severely Ltd.
Joined
Oct '10
Severely Ltd.

That is some beautiful writing as well as profoundly true. I am going to look for his books.


Joined
Feb '12
Bill Dempsey

Too bad black American's don't read Dr. Steele. Just today, a 78 year old white man was beaten by a gang of young blacks as they yelled "take this for Trayvon Martin". This is just the start of revenge violence in the name of Martin no matter what the investigation finds. The left in this country feeds off this kind of racial violence. Thank you NBC News.


Joined
Apr '11
nyconservative

Shelby Steele is a national treasure.....for some time I have said that the black community has been used by the left and made into perpetual victims.There is an entire industry built up over the years that depends on racial strife for their existence,the likes of Sharpton and Jackson being prime examples.The day that the black community casts these phony racial hucksters aside will be the day the sad travesty will come to an end.


Joined
Dec '11
Retail Lawyer

"These are things which many of us might think to ourselves and utter in private to a friend, but would never have the guts to broadcast. We –and I speak particularly of my own generational cohort here–have been trained to see a fact like the homicide rate among blacks as inherently racist.  It's as though certain facts are too ugly, too offensive to ever speak out loud."

Diane,  the above is pretty interesting.  The seeing of a fact is understood to be racist!  And then there are the legions of Facebook thought police.   I am sure you are on to something here.  It is similar for the Boomers, but I suspect it is much worse for younger, supposedly  "post racial" people.  What "training" are you referring to - how did this happen?  What do you suppose are the effects of this cognitive dissonance? 

My favorite part of the essay was where Steel talks about the players getting a chance to once again ennoble themselves by standing up to white racism.  Or earn money, feel relevant, keep the hustle going just a bit longer.  Won't work at all with Hispanic racism, though, so now we have "White Hispanics".

SMatthewStolte
Joined
Feb '11
SMatthewStolte

Although I appreciate essays like this, I don’t think they get to the crux of the cultural divide. The reason that Diane’s Facebook friend could call this a racist essay is that there are two fundamentally distinct & opposed conceptions of what racism actually is. On the one hand, racism can be understood as a perspective on the world — a perspective, which sees the world in terms of race. That’s my view, and it sounds like Steele’s view, too. 

But the other view takes racism to be something like a system of group ‘privilege’, in which members of the privileged class make use of various overt & covert tools to maintain their privilege & dominance. These tools include social modes of thought; and the colorblindness that we conservatives advocate is accused of reinforcing the system of white privilege, by pretending, at crucial moments, that race doesn’t exist. In other words, my definition of racism — my definition is racist (in this other sense). 

Steele’s appeal to brute facts, as if the facts alone can make the case for us, is naïve. One can have the facts right but the story wrong. We need more.

SMatthewStolte
Joined
Feb '11
SMatthewStolte

I said that Steele appeals to brute facts. But it occurs to me now that these words might have been too abbreviated. He plainly uses rhetorical techniques to tell our side of the story, and he uses them well. But what I find dissatisfying is that there’s really no attempt made to address the disagreement itself, no attempt to meet the race-theoretical perspective head on. Instead, the people who preach this perspective are simply called ambulance chasers and liars. Well, they may very well be. But they have such a theoretical framework behind them that pot shots at them will do very little good in the long run. 

Schrodinger's Cat
Joined
Mar '12
Schrodinger's Cat

We live in a world of debased language. The term 'racism' has become meaningless. Ture racism is an inherent belief in the superiority of one's own race over all others. The Hitler was a true racist. There is an insignificant number of racists in this country.

Bigotry, on the other hand, is pervasive and exists in ALL racial groups. The incident of the 78 year old beaten by black youths is a prime example of bigotry. A bigot projects a negative stereotype of an ethnic group onto a random individual from that group. Hence, a black who believes whites are "racists" will project that stereotype onto a white stranger.

My sense is that there is an acceleration of bigotry in all ethnic groups due to the divisive language employed by the current administration and the President in particular. I, for one, admit that I have more bigotted thoughts these days than I did even five years ago.

Aaron Miller
Joined
May '10
Aaron Miller
tabula rasa: I can't really put into words how much I admire men like Shelby Steele, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, and Allen West, black men who combine intelligence and bravery in order to confront and expose the racialist garbage that men like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton spew.

Yes, but how many blacks do they persuade? I'd like to hear their answers.

SMatthewStolte: 

But the other view takes racism to be something like a system of group ‘privilege’, in which members of the privileged class make use of various overt & covert tools to maintain their privilege & dominance. These tools include social modes of thought; and the colorblindness that we conservatives advocate is accused of reinforcing the system of white privilege, by pretending, at crucial moments, that race doesn’t exist.

Interesting.

Thomas Sowell has taken great interest in this country's history of immigrants from various places and cultures. I suspect his most powerful argument with blacks might be reflecting on how poor peoples built themselves up through self-reliance in spite of injustices. Also, describing his hometown of Harlem before Democrats got a hold on it might help.

More comedians like Bill Cosby could help.

SMatthewStolte
Joined
Feb '11
SMatthewStolte
Schrodinger's Cat: … racism is an inherent belief in the superiority of one's own race over all others. … Hitler was a true racist. There is an insignificant number of racists in this country.

SC, you might be right that racism is a belief in the superiority of one’s own race. But I want to suggest at least one reason to doubt it. Consider this bit of Nazi propaganda. I would call it extremely racist. But it claims  that the perspective it advocates does not consider one race to be the best race. Nazis can lie like the devil, of course. But I would say that, even without the claim to racial superiority — even if we could take the pamphlet at its word on this point — it would not be one whit less racist. 

Give Me Liberty
Joined
Apr '11
Give Me Liberty

Schrodinger's Cat, your use of the word bigotry is interesting.

From Merriam and Webster

Definition of BIGOT

: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance
That definition seems to describe the approach of the other racism that Matthew supplied below.

SMatthewStolte: But the other view takes racism to be something like a system of group ‘privilege’, in which members of the privileged class make use of various overt & covert tools to maintain their privilege & dominance. These tools include social modes of thought; and the colorblindness that we conservatives advocate is accused of reinforcing the system of white privilege, by pretending, at crucial moments, that race doesn’t exist. In other words, my definition of racism — my definition is racist (in this other sense).  · 42 minutes ago
Diane Ellis
Severely Ltd.: That is some beautiful writing as well as profoundly true. I am going to look for his books. · 3 hours ago

I was compelled to look for more of his writing this morning.  His book White Guilt looks fascinating.

Also, when I was a brand new assistant on Uncommon Knowledge, Peter interviewed Dr. Steele.  In this interview, Shelby Steele discusses Obama and the politics of race.

Diane Ellis

Retail Lawyer: "These are things which many of us might think to ourselves and utter in private to a friend, but would never have the guts to broadcast. We –and I speak particularly of my own generational cohort here–have been trained to see a fact like the homicide rate among blacks as inherently racist.  It's as though certain facts are too ugly, too offensive to ever speak out loud."

...the above is pretty interesting.  The seeing of a fact is understood to be racist!... I am sure you are on to something here.  It is similar for the Boomers, but I suspect it is much worse for younger, supposedly  "post racial" people.  What "training" are you referring to - how did this happen?  What do you suppose are the effects of this cognitive dissonance? 

I didn't grow up with political correctness, and I went to a Christian high school, so I wasn't trained in the rules of acceptable thought and speech until college.  For me, figuring out the taboos of the politically correct world happened in college, mostly through peer pressure.  As a freshman, one learns pretty quickly what will attract the smug condemnation of her classmates.

Diane Ellis

SMatthewStolte: ...there are two fundamentally distinct & opposed conceptions of what racism actually is. On the one hand, racism can be understood as a perspective on the world — a perspective, which sees the world interms of race. That’s my view, and it sounds like Steele’s view, too. 

But the other view takes racism to be something like a system of group ‘privilege’, in which members of the privileged class make use of various overt & covert tools to maintain their privilege & dominance. These tools include social modes of thought; and the colorblindness that we conservatives advocate is accused of reinforcing the system of white privilege, by pretending, at crucial moments, that race doesn’t exist. In other words, my definition of racism — mydefinitionis racist (in this other sense). 

Steele’s appeal to brute facts, as if the facts alone can make the case for us, is naïve. One can have the facts right but the story wrong. We need more

This is insightful.  I encourage you to expound upon this in a separate post on the Member Feed if you're so inclined.  I think it deserves a conversation of its own


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In