Bill McGurn · January 21, 2011 at 1:11am

My WSJ colleague James Taranto published a provocative piece yesterday trying to explain the hatred toward Sarah Palin. Well worth a read.  When I spoke to him, he thought that a lot of it is abortion, and the fact that she lives her convictions there (carrying Trig to term even after she knew he had Down).

I think that abortion has a part, but is not the whole story (read James' whole story for some of the other factors). My reasoning is that there are any number of Republican and conservative women who are pro-choice and yet seem to suffer from being considered not quite legitimate. A parallel example might be Clarence Thomas, whom people declare not really being black. To me that is because the left tends to define identity for a "woman," "gay," "black," etc. in highly politicized terms. (Claire, if you are reading, weren't there people who didn't consider Mrs. T a "woman" in this sense -- not that Mrs. T would care).

Point is, James has posted a piece well worth reading. And I'd like to hear the reactions. Again, this isn't about whether Gov. Palin should be the nominee, or even if you agree with her. It's about the nature of the liberal hatred for her. Anyone?

Comments:


Lady Kurobara
Joined
Nov '10
Lady Kurobara

Mollie Hemingway

Conor Friedersdorf

Mollie,

Let me put it this way. I blogged about how silly it was to argue that Sarah Palin's campaign map played a role in the Tuscon shooting.

Was that accusation more or less absurd than these accusations:

– Bill and Hillary Clinton arranged the murder of Vince Foster.

– Barack Obama is allied with our Islamist enemy in a grand jihad against America.

You'll note that however wrong those last two ideas are, they are at least related to reality. Vince Foster worked for Bill Clinton and killed himself. Barack Obama is Commander in Chief and doesn't fight our enemies as some of his critics would like. Using their own words and actions, there are at least ties here.

That is exactly the point.

Conor, you are engaging in what I call rhetorical "tap dancing" and all your arguments boil down to the same thing — equivocate, equivocate, equivocate.

Conor Friedersdorf

Mollie Hemingway

You'll note that however wrong those last two ideas are, they are at least related to reality. Vince Foster worked for Bill Clinton and killed himself. Barack Obama is Commander in Chief and doesn't fight our enemies as some of his critics would like. Using their own words and actions, there are at least ties here. The TucsonPalinphobia? Thin air. A different class altogether, right? Also worth noting that no mainstream paper or New York Times oped writer advanced your examples -- so also different. Right? Beginning to see the difference? · Jan 20 at 7:01pm

Sorry. Neither accusation is "related to reality." They're paranoid, conspiratorial nonsense. And Mollie, look, Fox News is the most popular cable news outlet in America. Andy McCarthy's book was a New York Times bestseller. Rush Limbaugh is the most popular radio host in America. If the words mean anything, these are mainstream media figures disseminating their work through mainstream outlets and publishers. Don't be fooled by the way that we use the words "mainstream media." It's misleading shorthand.


Joined
Dec '10
Nickolas

Conor Friedersdorf

Let me put it this way. I blogged about how silly it was to argue that Sarah Palin's campaign map played a role in the Tuscon shooting.

Was that accusation more or less absurd than these accusations:

– Bill and Hillary Clinton arranged the murder of Vince Foster.

– Barack Obama is allied with our Islamist enemy in a grand jihad against America. · 

Where's the equivalence?

Just to mention a couple of differences...

The MSM did not take these "theories" seriously or dwell on them. It ignored them.

OTOH, the MSM loved the idea that Palin might in some way be responsible for the Tuscon massacre and ran with it, providing wall to wall coverrage and speculation for days.

Also, Palin is not the President, much less an elected official or an appointed government official. Palin is a private citizen.

cdor
Joined
Jun '10
cdor

 "Even besides her electoral aspirations, she is a nationally famous political commentator who deliberately courts controversy."

Conner, can you please explain how Palin deliberately courts controversy. How did she court  explicitly being accused of causing the multiple murders and attempted assasination in Arizona? How did she court being accused of having her daughters child? How did she court being called stupid? Do you think she is stupid?

Kenneth
Joined
Jul '10
Kenneth

Listen, I gotta step out for a moment.

But I'm counting on you guys to keep up the sucker-punching, eye-gouging and motive-impugning while I'm away. 

Anybody need me to pick up a pack of smokes?

Or some Band-aids?

Edited on January 21, 2011 at 4:27am
Conor Friedersdorf

cdor:  "Even besides her electoral aspirations, she is a nationally famous political commentator who deliberately courts controversy."

Conner, can you please explain how Palin deliberately courts controversy. How did she court  explicitly being accused of causing the multiple murders and attempted assasination in Arizona? How did she court being accused of having her daughters child? How did she court being called stupid? Do you think she is stupid? · Jan 20 at 7:17pm

No, Cdor, she didn't court controversy in any of those ways. Just lots of other ways. Surely you recognize this, right? I understand that we disagree somewhere here, but you must understand that some of what Palin does is deliberately provocative.

Lady Kurobara
Joined
Nov '10
Lady Kurobara

Conor Friedersdorf

Mollie Hemingway

You'll note that however wrong those last two ideas are, they are at least related to reality. Vince Foster worked for Bill Clinton and killed himself. Barack Obama is Commander in Chief and doesn't fight our enemies as some of his critics would like. Using their own words and actions, there are at least ties here. The TucsonPalinphobia? Thin air. A different class altogether, right? Also worth noting that no mainstream paper or New York Times oped writer advanced your examples -- so also different. Right? Beginning to see the difference?

Sorry. Neither accusation is "related to reality." They're paranoid, conspiratorial nonsense.

I beg to differ.  Circumstantial evidence strongly suggests that Vince Foster killed himself inside the White House.  Naturally, that would have been a major scandal, and the Clintonites spent a feverish night moving the body and rearranging the evidence.  There is nothing inherently paranoid, implausible or nonsensical about that theory.

And Obama's attitude toward Islam is highly ambiguous, to say the least.

So I must stand with Mollie.

Mollie Hemingway

Conor Friedersdorf

Sorry. Neither accusation is "related to reality." They're paranoid, conspiratorial nonsense.  · Jan 20 at 7:15pm

Conor, I get that this is how you roll, but don't be ridiculous. Foster did work for Clinton and did die under bizarre circumstances. Those are facts. Alleging he was murdered might be the type of conspiratorial nonsense you're familiar with over at Daily Dish, but at least Clinton and Foster actually worked together. See how that's a "tie" that wasn't present in Tucson? And if you actually didn't understand how the term mainstream media is used, I would explain it to you. But I suspect that's just more gameplaying, too. Let me know, please, if NYT/WP/CNN, etc. writes a think piece on folks discussing whether Obama is helping Islamists out, though, okay?

outstripp
Joined
May '10
outstripp

I think Palin's greatest "sin" is that she is extremely American.  Thus, the left's objection to her is a logical consequence of the fact that the subtext to all liberal positions is that America sucks.

Mike LaRoche
Joined
Oct '10
Mike LaRoche

Lady Kurobara

Conor Friedersdorf

 

Well, consider me on neither side. I try to call out theories that seem absurd to me when I see them.

God save us all from those who equivocate.

And I hate self-styled neutrals.  Pick a side and fight it out, damn it.

The cool, ironic detachment schtick is getting old, Conor.  Even Letterman has become tiresome. · Jan 20 at 6:58pm

Edited on Jan 20 at 07:00 pm

Amen to this.

As I've said before, the middle of the road is for white lines and armadillos.

Those who equivocate and say "but the right does it, too" are merely engaging in a gussied up version of the shopworn taunt of "I know you are, but what am I?"  Please, grow up.

Jon in SC
Joined
Dec '10
Jon in DC

I was on a bus going to work one morning approaching the Bay Bridge moving slowly through the morning traffic toward San Francisco.  We passed over a Berkeley student riot during the "Peoples Park" era in 68 or 69.  This was truely a most frightening sight to behold.  Flocks of people in panic running first this way and then that fleeing police and teargas. Injured on the ground.  Flashing lights.  A sight never forgotten.

I later that day asked an older co-worker what in the world it was all about.  His sage comment.  The riots, he said, were irrational.  As such there is no adequate way to explain them.  I think that applies to Palin derangement syndrome and perhaps some of the other irrational reactions of the left.

Try as we will, we cannot adequately explain the irrational.  We can only gaze in wonder.  It resists rational inquiry.  It defies reasoned explanation.    

Brian Watt
Joined
Jun '10
Brian Watt

Kenneth: Listen, I gotta step out for a moment.

But I'm counting on you guys to keep up the sucker-punching, eye-gouging and motive-impugning while I'm away. 

Anybody need me to pick up a pack of smokes?

Or some Band-aids? · Jan 20 at 7:23pm

Edited on Jan 20 at 07:27 pm

Can I come with you and ride shotgun? Uh oh, am I allowed to say that now?

Pseudodionysius
Joined
Sep '10
Pseudodionysius

Vince Foster killed himself inside the White House.

Now that you mention it, I'd forgotten about those Rose law firm billing records and Hillary's amazing ability to make money on cattle futures. I'm a proud member of the VRWC (Vast Right Wing Cats).

Pseudodionysius
Joined
Sep '10
Pseudodionysius

Can I come with you and ride shotgun? Uh oh, am I allowed to say that now?

Yes, but you can't have more than 5 rounds in the shotgun, and it can only contain either rock salt or bad words that pop out of the end of the gun like on the 60's Batman television series.

Pseudodionysius
Joined
Sep '10
Pseudodionysius

Living in Canada, I've found that I can have some fun with the name Sarah Palin by using it as a generic phrase to attach any kind of ridiculous insinuation and watch the party guests eat it up. You can even make a drinking game out of it. Its like scrabble but with random assertions. So, for example, I mentioned the other night:

"Hey, I heard Sarah Palin wants to get rid of NASA because of President Obama's Muslim outreach initiative." The heads bob furiously in agreement like one of those dimestore flamingos sucking out of a drinking glass. You can say pretty much anything and the eurosophisticate cocktail set eats it up. Secretly birthing lizards, flat earth, believing that Capricorn One was a documentary, pick whatever you want and append the name "Sarah Palin" to it, and you've made a liberal your friend for life. They'll even start making up their own crazy assertions to try and ingratiate themselves with you.

After listening to the podcast, I think I'll do a V tiein and say that Palin is really one of the lizard people sent here from another planet. Film at 11.

Brian Watt
Joined
Jun '10
Brian Watt

Pseudodionysius: Can I come with you and ride shotgun? Uh oh, am I allowed to say that now?

Yes, but you can't have more than 5 rounds in the shotgun, and it can only contain either rock salt or bad words that pop out of the end of the gun like on the 60's Batman television series. · Jan 20 at 8:01pm

POW! BIFF! BANG! Na-na-na-na-Batman! Ah, the memories of a colossal waste of time.

John Marzan
Joined
Oct '10
John Marzan

the left is just trying to find a new replacement for their bete noir, George W. Bush. and she fits the bill perfectly.

At the same time, they're hoping she runs for president in 2012.

cdor
Joined
Jun '10
cdor

No, Cdor, she didn't court controversy in any of those ways. Just lots of other ways. Surely you recognize this, right? I understand that we disagree somewhere here, but you must understand that some of what Palin does is deliberately provocative.

Actually, it's impossible to respond specifically to such an ambiguous statement.

Mike LaRoche
Joined
Oct '10
Mike LaRoche
Pseudodionysius: "Hey, I heard Sarah Palin wants to get rid of NASA because of President Obama's Muslim outreach initiative." The heads bob furiously in agreement like one of those dimestore flamingos sucking out of a drinking glass. You can say pretty much anything and the eurosophisticate cocktail set eats it up. Secretly birthing lizards, flat earth, believing that Capricorn One was a documentary, pick whatever you want and append the name "Sarah Palin" to it, and you've made a liberal your friend for life. They'll even start making up their own crazy assertions to try and ingratiate themselves with you.

I wonder how they'd react if you told them that Palin wanted to ban dihydrogen monoxide.

flownover
Joined
Aug '10
flownover

Ladies (rica chic as) Why do we stand on the shore of the cold Atlantic listening to the Lamentations of the Left ? Let's get Spacific ! Rob ? This goes any further east , we can drop Sullivan back in England. We could pass the hat and do rather well. But I have to thank him for Vico and Oakeshott .

Edited on January 21, 2011 at 5:21am

Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In