A report in The Detroit News reveals that the Santorum campaign paid for robocalls to Democrats asking them to vote for him in the Michigan open primary today. The campaign's communications director Hogan Gidley justified the robocalling strategy, explaining that, "We know that if we can get a Reagan Democrat in the primary, we can get them in the fall."

Mitt Romney is predictably upset about this maneuver, lambasting it as "a real effort to kidnap [the Republican] primary process."

And Democrats?  Well, they seem to be thrilled.  Earlier this month, the Daily Kos announced "Operation Hilarity," which calls for Democratic voters in states with open primaries and caucuses to vote for Rick Santorum whom they judge to be the weaker Republican standard bearer.

It's time for us to take an active role in the GOP nomination process. That's right, it's time for those of us who live in open primary and caucus states—Michigan, North Dakota, Vermont and Tennesseein the next three weeks—to head out and cast a vote for Rick Santorum.

Why would we do such a crazy thing? Lots of great reasons!

Republican turnout has sucked, and appears to be getting worse by the contest

Several of the contests have produced razor-thin margins of victory.

The longer this GOP primary drags on, the better the numbers for Team Blue.

The longer this thing drags out, the more unpopular the Republican presidential pretenders become.

[...]

And in any case, it's freaking hilarious. I mean, Rick Santorum? Really? The Republicans have offered up this big, slow, juicy softball. Let's have fun whacking the heck out of it.

I'm skeptical about the efficacy of such a hijacking scheme, but if you're on Team Santorum, I can see being delighted with the plan as you expectantly count down the days until this all blows up in the Democrats' faces as Rick Santorum lands in the White House.  If, on the other hand, you're on Team Romney, you're understandably mortified by this development, as you watch the race take yet another turn toward the ugly.

Comments:


Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque

One wonders why the people of Michigan (like the people of my state, California) decided to make their primaries open.  But they did, and when we now see Mitt Romney decrying Santorum's cross-party pitch as a "dirty trick," we are reminded of the many times Mitt told his competitors to quit whining about his own attacks on them.

Besides, we've also been constantly admonished that we need a candidate who appeals to more than a single wing of the Republican Party.  If Santorum can appeal to Reagan Democrats -- and there are a lot of working-class ethnic Catholic Democrats in the Rust Belt -- that means he's a better candidate in the general election, yes?

Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque

Diane Ellis, Ed.:

It's time for us to take an active role in the GOP nomination process. That's right, it's time for those of us who live in open primary and caucus states—Michigan, North Dakota, Vermont and Tennesseein the next three weeks—to head out and cast a vote for Rick Santorum.

Why would we do such a crazy thing? Lots of great reasons!

Republican turnout has sucked, and appears to be getting worse by the contest

Several of the contests have produced razor-thin margins of victory.

The longer this GOP primary drags on, the better the numbers for Team Blue.

The longer this thing drags out, the more unpopular the Republican presidential pretenders become.

[...]

And in any case, it's freaking hilarious. I mean, Rick Santorum? Really? The Republicans have offered up this big, slow, juicy softball. Let's have fun whacking the heck out of it.

The problem with a politically correct childhood is that one never learns the valuable lessons of the Uncle Remus stories (Disney won't release Song of the South on DVD).

The Progressive KosKids are about to throw the Republican Party into a briar patch.

Douglas
Joined
Mar '11
Douglas

So when Romney won New Hampshire with the help of crossover voters, that was... bad?

Palaeologus
Joined
Jul '10
Palaeologus

Oh yeah? Well I voted against Obama in the Dem primary. Let's see how they like them apples.

Seriously though, I don't think the MI Left organized nearly as effectively for Santorum as it did for McCain in 2000. Mostly because it lacked the big target (Gov. John Engler) and because Ron Paul is keeping it from acting as a unified bloc.

Gus Marvinson
Joined
Mar '11
Gus Marvinson

Santorum saw an opportunity and capitalized on it. I like it.

CandE
Joined
Jul '11
CandE
Gus Marvinson: Santorum saw an opportunity and capitalized on it. I like it. · 1 minute ago

Rules is rules.  I still hope Romney wins, but there is nothing dirty about using every available ethical/legal tactic at your disposal.

-E

Wylee Coyote
Joined
Jul '10
Wylee Coyote

So, if he wins, he will essentially owe his victory to the Michigan autoworkers' unions.  Nothing can possibly go wrong with this plan.

The King Prawn
Joined
Dec '10
The King Prawn

I bet Romney thinks it's just fine to use audio of Santorum's endorsement from '08 for his robocalls. It really is silly season.

Nick Stuart
Joined
May '10
Nick Stuart

The general election campaign will be no holds barred, fists boots and all. Now is as good a time as any for the candidates to get used to it.

Valiuth
Joined
Apr '11
Valiuth

I don't know...the warning of folklore rings through my head..."Be careful what you wish for." 

DocJay
Joined
Jul '11
DocJay

I call upon the powers of darkness to form a new order of lion and hyena.

Fred Cole
Joined
Nov '11
Fred Cole

Mark my words, kids:

This will backfire for Santorum.  Not in the short term, he might win MI, but it'll hurt him.

Leporello
Joined
Feb '12
Leporello

Romney is using every lawful means at his disposal, including the informal help of Ron Paul, so why shouldn't Santorum use every lawful means at his disposal - especially since Santorum is at a serious money disadvantage?  

Losing nobly lost its charm in 2008.

(Ahem, er, please see my later qualification here as I re-thought the matter.)

Edited on February 29, 2012 at 2:28am
J. D. Fitzpatrick
Joined
Oct '10
J. D. Fitzpatrick
Stuart Creque: One wonders why the people of Michigan (like the people of my state, California) decided to make their primaries open.  But they did, 

The CA Democratic primary is open, but not the Republican. I didn't look closely enough into this, and so as an Independent, I'm stuck choosing candidates for the American Independent primary. 

Or, come to think of it, the Democratic primary ...

Snow Bird
Joined
Feb '11
Snow Bird

The basic problem is that the tactic of deliberately trying to sabotage the opposition party's primary, regardless of which side is doing it, is nothing but malicious destructiveness. We endlessly whine about the mean tone of political campaigns and then engage in political vandalism and wonder why potential candidates opt out of the process. People are basically schmucks. They get the political process they deserve.

The New Clear Option
Joined
Apr '11
The New Clear Option

Y'know, I'm not actually turning down the cynicism here, but the case really could be made by Team Santorum that it should be the goal of any viable candidate, Republican or Democrat, to appeal to voters' own self-interest in having the best candidates to choose from in the general election. Whether you're a die hard Obamanaut or a conservative, social-issues Republican or just a plain ol' registered Republican or Democrat, all Americans should hope they have the best options available at the ballot box.

The fact we don't have that now and, barring a miracle (or two), won't in the general is beside the point that if Santorum wants to appeal to "Reagan Democrats" or really any other recognizable bloc of voters, more power to him. Like CandE says above, there's nothing illegal nor unethical about it. If he actually pulls it off, that'll be yet another reason for the Powers That Be to reconsider their own instincts about Romney's vaunted electability in the general.

Mendel
Joined
Mar '11
Mendel

The question isn't whether Santorum should appeal to Democrats (he should be in it to win it, and that means everything is fair game), but whether having open primaries makes any sense at all.

It is true that open primaries may cool the ideological fervor which is inevitable when large numbers of party registrees vote.  But at the same time, an open primary simply invites disinterested individuals to participate in the inner workings of a private organization.  How can that be beneficial?

Tristan Abbey
Joined
Jan '11
Tristan Abbey

Interesting discussion here -- I think another point is the apparently contradiction b/w these two things:

  1. In contrast to the allegedly utilitarian, "scorched-earth" campaign of Romney, Santorum has been presented as the "pure" conservative and honorable choice, and he decried cross-over voting earlier in January: "We want the activists of the party, the people who make up the backbone of the Republican Party to have a say in who our nominee is as opposed to a bunch of people who don't even identify themselves as Republicans picking our nominee...I don't like that. I believe that states should only allow Republicans to vote in Republican primaries."
  2. Santorum now embracing said tactic: "We're going to get voters that we need to be able to win this election and we're going to do that here in Michigan."

People say that Romney is a meaningless candidate without "electability." Is Santorum meaningful without "purity"?

Humbly submitted, of course.

Edited on February 28, 2012 at 11:31pm
show Dan's comment (#19)
Dan
Joined
May '11
Dan
Diane Ellis, Ed.: Hogan Gidley justified the robocalling strategy, explaining that, "We know that if we can get a Reagan Democrat in the primary, we can get them in the fall."
Stuart Creque: Besides, we've also been constantly admonished that we need a candidate who appeals to more than a single wing of the Republican Party.  If Santorum can appeal to Reagan Democrats -- and there are a lot of working-class ethnic Catholic Democrats in the Rust Belt -- that means he's a better candidate in the general election, yes?

        I'm not sure how far this really can be taken.  Based on 'Operation Hilarity', it's clear at least some Democrats intend to vote for Santorum not because they like him but because they think he's easier to beat.

Diane Ellis, Ed.:

The longer this GOP primary drags on, the better the numbers for Team Blue.

The longer this thing drags out, the more unpopular the Republican presidential pretenders become.

The Republicans have offered up this big, slow, juicy softball. Let's have fun whacking the heck out of it.

Those people are hardcore Obama partisans; no Republican could count on their votes in the general.

Mel Foil
Joined
Jun '10
etoiledunord

Dan

 
 

        I'm not sure how far this really can be taken.  Based on 'Operation Hilarity', it's clear at least some Democrats intend to vote for Santorum not because they like him but because they think he's easier to beat.

 

Santorum knows that too. I suspect that's why he's been extra Christian lately. He knows they (Democrats in Michigan) think that's political suicide, and that would make Democrats want to help him. But, the Republicans that have actually won the office in recent elections have been the social conservatives.

Edited on February 28, 2012 at 11:41pm

Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In