Paul A. Rahe · February 15, 2012 at 7:39pm
RickSantorum

Anyone inclined to be misled by the Romney advertisement posted by Troy Senik below should read the article Was Santorum a Senate Spendthrift? posted by Jeffrey Anderson and Andy Wickersham on the website of The Weekly Standard. It turns out that the National Taxpayers Union -- no friend to big spenders -- consistently gave Rick Santorum higher grades than almost any other Republican Senator.

Santorum has his weaknesses. But in this particular he is unassailable. What will the Romney people do next? Accuse him of having committed nepotism with his own sister?

Comments:



Joined
Dec '10
BKelley14

Stuart, et al, the very last thing we (the GOP) need(s) right now is a debate on social issues.  Santorum keeps feeding right into this trap. Gheesh.

James Of England
Joined
Apr '11
James Of England

wmartin

katievs

BKelley14: Very conservative voters vote in these primaries. Their social views align with Santorum's. They will be washed away in a huge tsunami in the general election by those who oppose or fear Santorum's highly conservative social views.  · 1 minute ago

I think he'll surprise you there.  A lot of "normal Americans" are quietly appalled about how far we have gone into the swamp, culturally.  They know it's not good.  They'll respond to his common sense linking of fiscal soundness with family values. ·

Oh, they'll "respond", all right. They'll respond, and Rick Santorum will be crushed by a gender gap heretofore unimagined in national elections. · 

At the moment, Santorum gets pretty equal gender support. Mitt gets more women, Newt has the gender balance of an all male choir. There's a lot of pro-life women out there, and Santorum has had moments of brilliance in fighting the fight. It's true that the women in combat thing, laundered through Saturday night comics, People Magazine, and the other ways people get their news, is probably unhelpful, but the split won't be all that bad. An unattractive female VP would help.

Palaeologus
Joined
Jul '10
Palaeologus

katievs

wmartin

katievs

BKelley14: Very conservative voters vote in these primaries. Their social views align with Santorum's. They will be washed away in a huge tsunami in the general election by those who oppose or fear Santorum's highly conservative social views.  · 1 minute ago

I think he'll surprise you there.  A lot of "normal Americans" are quietly appalled about how far we have gone into the swamp, culturally.  They know it's not good.  They'll respond to his common sense linking of fiscal soundness with family values. · 1 minute ago

Oh, they'll "respond", all right. They'll respond, and Rick Santorum will be crushed by a gender gap heretofore unimagined in national elections. · 6 minutes ago

It's a conceit of the left that women are against Santorum.  Lots of us like men who faithfully love their wives, who love children, who care about moral values, who think life is precious and gift from God, who don't want to see women objectified and children sexualized.

All the more if that man comes across as serious, competent, decent, and smart. 

Agreed Katie.

But surely this description fits Mitt also.


Joined
Dec '10
BKelley14

There's a lot of pro-life women out there, and Santorum has had moments of brilliance in fighting the fight. It's true that the women in combat thing, laundered through Saturday night comics, People Magazine, and the other ways people get their news, is probably unhelpful, but the split won't be all that bad. 

I can't buy into this. Most women I know are utterly appalled at Santorum. They are also not buying into the latest Catholic Church vs. birth control availability controversy. Most believe their birth control rights are under assault. 


Joined
Dec '10
BKelley14

It's a conceit of the left that women are against Santorum.  Lots of us like men who faithfully love their wives, who love children, who care about moral values, who think life is precious and gift from God, who don't want to see women objectified and children sexualized.

All the more if that man comes across as serious, competent, decent, and smart. 

It's not a conceit of the left!! The "lots of us" you describe are NOT the majority of voters, sad to say.  Plus, many women voters in this country see Obama as "serious, competent, decent and smart."

James Of England
Joined
Apr '11
James Of England

Palaeologus

Scott Reusser: Yawn. And the daily double standard in critiquing Romney continues.

The fact that Santorum was a better than average Republican Senator (top quarter/quintile or so)ca 1995-2006 on the issue is a useful, but hardly dispositive, data point.

While the NTU gives no details on how it arrives at its score (the objective part of the score is terrible for him), the Club For Growth has a study with more discussion.

eg.: "In the 2003-2004 session of Congress, Santorum sponsored or cosponsored 51 bills to increase spending, and failed to sponsor or co-sponsor even one spending cut proposal. In his last Congress (2005-2006), he had one of the biggest spending agendas of any Republican -- sponsoring more spending increases than Republicans Lisa Murkowski, Lincoln Chafee and Thad Cochran or Democrats Herb Kohl, Evan Bayh and Ron Wyden."

I hear that's the arch conservative Lincoln Chafee.


Joined
Apr '11
wmartin

James Of England

wmartin

katievs

 

At the moment, Santorum gets pretty equal gender support. Mitt gets more women, Newt has the gender balance of an all male choir. There's a lot of pro-life women out there, and Santorum has had moments of brilliance in fighting the fight. It's true that the women in combat thing, laundered through Saturday night comics, People Magazine, and the other ways people get their news, is probably unhelpful, but the split won't be all that bad. An unattractive female VP would help. · 3 minutes ago

I know they're about equal at the moment. This is a Republican primary, after all. Right now, Obama is winning 52% of white women; I can't imagine that would be less than 56%ish once his comments on "the dangers of contraception" and various other things that have already been rehashed here again and again become more widely known.

Palaeologus
Joined
Jul '10
Palaeologus

BKelley14:There's a lot of pro-life women out there, and Santorum has had moments of brilliance in fighting the fight. It's true that the women in combat thing, laundered through Saturday night comics, People Magazine, and the other ways people get their news, is probably unhelpful, but the split won't be all that bad. 

I can't buy into this. Most women I know are utterly appalled at Santorum. They are also not buying into the latest Catholic Church vs. birth control availability controversy. Most believe their birth control rights are under assault.  · 1 minute ago

Come now.

Once we're speaking with a single voice, even the world's biggest stumblebum can communicate that there is a great difference between restricting access to the pill, and federally mandating that all employers must cover it without a co-pay.

James Of England
Joined
Apr '11
James Of England

BKelley14:There's a lot of pro-life women out there, and Santorum has had moments of brilliance in fighting the fight. It's true that the women in combat thing, laundered through Saturday night comics, People Magazine, and the other ways people get their news, is probably unhelpful, but the split won't be all that bad. 

I can't buy into this. Most women I know are utterly appalled at Santorum. They are also not buying into the latest Catholic Church vs. birth control availability controversy. Most believe their birth control rights are under assault.  · 4 minutes ago

My experience is the same, although somewhat better on the HHS Mandate, but I expect that the polling companies have more representative samples than we do.

I'm entertained, incidentally, by the latest form that mandate support has taken, at least in the Dem fundraising emails I get. "Your boss shouldn't decide what kind of health care you use. That's just wrong." The only truly free way to live is to have the government make your choices! Without universal slavery, we will never have universal freedom!

Lucy Pevensie
Joined
Nov '10
Lucy Pevensie

wmartin

katievs

BKelley14: Very conservative voters vote in these primaries. Their social views align with Santorum's. They will be washed away in a huge tsunami in the general election by those who oppose or fear Santorum's highly conservative social views. 

Oh, they'll "respond", all right. They'll respond, and Rick Santorum will be crushed by a gender gap heretofore unimagined in national elections. · 19 minutes ago

Right.  The general electorate is really liberal on social issues.  I mean, look at California, known as one of the most socially conservative states around (ahem), yet even there gay marriage was supported overwhelmingly by the electorate when they put it to the vote.  Right?  Or maybe not so much. 

James Of England
Joined
Apr '11
James Of England

wmartin

James Of England

wmartin

katievs

 

At the moment, Santorum gets pretty equal gender support. Mitt gets more women, Newt has the gender balance of an all male choir. There's a lot of pro-life women out there, and Santorum has had moments of brilliance in fighting the fight. It's true that the women in combat thing, laundered through Saturday night comics, People Magazine, and the other ways people get their news, is probably unhelpful, but the split won't be all that bad. An unattractive female VP would help. ·

I know they're about equal at the moment. This is a Republican primary, after all. Right now, Obama is winning 52% of white women; I can't imagine that would be less than 56%ish once his comments on "the dangers of contraception" and various other things that have already been rehashed here again and again become more widely known. ·

Man, there's just no way to write about "how women think" without feeling like a neanderthal. Anyway, I agree that it will mobilize a lot of 'em, but I think that the church will mobilize a lot against. Women are much more involved in churches.

katievs
Joined
May '10
katievs
BKelley14: Stuart, et al, the very last thing we (the GOP) need(s) right now is a debate on social issues.  Santorum keeps feeding right into this trap. Gheesh. · 18 minutes ago

And he keeps rising in the polls.  Odd.

Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque
BKelley14: Stuart, et al, the very last thing we (the GOP) need(s) right now is a debate on social issues.  Santorum keeps feeding right into this trap. Gheesh. · 15 minutes ago

As several other commenters here have said, some of us feel that social issues are in fact a far better battleground to fight on than narrowly-defined economic issues, especially because the jobless rate may be on an improving trend over the next eight months and Obama will be able to argue that to a draw.  Certainly the Republicans in Congress aren't being very helpful in drawing a hard line on the issues of deficit spending and the debt.

katievs
Joined
May '10
katievs

BKelley14:There's a lot of pro-life women out there, and Santorum has had moments of brilliance in fighting the fight. It's true that the women in combat thing, laundered through Saturday night comics, People Magazine, and the other ways people get their news, is probably unhelpful, but the split won't be all that bad. 

I can't buy into this. Most women I know are utterly appalled at Santorum. They are also not buying into the latest Catholic Church vs. birth control availability controversy. Most believe their birth control rights are under assault.  · 12 minutes ago

Sounds like you hang around stupid women.  "Birth control rights under assault" because some employers don't want to be forced to pay for them?

Virtually all the women in my life love Santorum.  

Lucy Pevensie
Joined
Nov '10
Lucy Pevensie

BKelley14: 

I can't buy into this. Most women I know are utterly appalled at Santorum. They are also not buying into the latest Catholic Church vs. birth control availability controversy. Most believe their birth control rights are under assault.  · 11 minutes ago

Same for the women I know.  This only goes to show that you and I both live in a blue bubble.  Most of the women I know would have overwhelmingly voted for gay marriage when it was on the ballot in California.  We know women who are not representative of the majority of Americans.  Or, to put it in statistical terms, our (relatively small) samples are not very generalizable.

By the way, in at least one Michigan poll discussed here on Ricochet showed no gender gap among Santorum voters. 


Joined
Dec '10
BKelley14

katievs

BKelley14: Stuart, et al, the very last thing we (the GOP) need(s) right now is a debate on social issues.  Santorum keeps feeding right into this trap. Gheesh. · 18 minutes ago

And he keeps rising in the polls.  Odd. · 8 minutes ago

What polls? Not the general election polls.


Joined
Apr '11
wmartin

Lucy Pevensie

wmartin

katievs

BKelley14: Very conservative voters vote in these primaries. Their social views align with Santorum's. They will be washed away in a huge tsunami in the general election by those who oppose or fear Santorum's highly conservative social views. 

Oh, they'll "respond", all right. They'll respond, and Rick Santorum will be crushed by a gender gap heretofore unimagined in national elections. · 19 minutes ago

Right.  The general electorate is really liberal on social issues.  I mean, look at California, known as one of the most socially conservative states around (ahem), yet even there gay marriage was supported overwhelmingly by the electorate when they put it to the vote.  Right?  Or maybe not so much.  · 8 minutes ago

If only whites and Asians had voted in 2008 , gay marriage would be legal in California due to the ballot box, and there would have been no controversial court cases. It is illegal due to demographic groups that are otherwise not in play for us.

Edited on February 16, 2012 at 3:56am
Palaeologus
Joined
Jul '10
Palaeologus

katievs

BKelley14: Stuart, et al, the very last thing we (the GOP) need(s) right now is a debate on social issues.  Santorum keeps feeding right into this trap. Gheesh. · 18 minutes ago

And he keeps rising in the polls.  Odd. · 3 minutes ago

As Yoda said to Luke: Remember your failure at the Cain!

I know it wasn't your failure Katie, and that Cain's rise wasn't about social issues. 

But I couldn't resist, and those polls might not last.

Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque

James Of England

Palaeologus

Scott Reusser: Yawn. And the daily double standard in critiquing Romney continues.

The fact that Santorum was a better than average Republican Senator (top quarter/quintile or so)ca 1995-2006 on the issue is a useful, but hardly dispositive, data point.

While the NTU gives no details on how it arrives at its score (the objective part of the score is terrible for him), the Club For Growth has a study with more discussion.

eg.: "In the 2003-2004 session of Congress, Santorum sponsored or cosponsored 51 bills to increase spending, and failed to sponsor or co-sponsor even one spending cut proposal. In his last Congress (2005-2006), he had one of the biggest spending agendas of any Republican -- sponsoring more spending increases than Republicans Lisa Murkowski, Lincoln Chafee and Thad Cochran or Democrats Herb Kohl, Evan Bayh and Ron Wyden."

I hear that's the arch conservative Lincoln Chafee. · 16 minutes ago

So the Club for Growth is an authority on the candidates' economic plans and their credibility with respect to those plans?

Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque

Palaeologus

katievs

BKelley14: Stuart, et al, the very last thing we (the GOP) need(s) right now is a debate on social issues.  Santorum keeps feeding right into this trap. Gheesh. · 18 minutes ago

And he keeps rising in the polls.  Odd. · 3 minutes ago

As Yoda said to Luke:Remember your failure at the Cain!

I know it wasn't your failure Katie, and that Cain's rise wasn't about social issues. 

But I couldn't resist, and those polls might not last. · 0 minutes ago

As Romney's poll leads have not.

He may mount a comeback.  Or he may fall further behind.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In