Paul A. Rahe · February 15, 2012 at 7:39pm
RickSantorum

Anyone inclined to be misled by the Romney advertisement posted by Troy Senik below should read the article Was Santorum a Senate Spendthrift? posted by Jeffrey Anderson and Andy Wickersham on the website of The Weekly Standard. It turns out that the National Taxpayers Union -- no friend to big spenders -- consistently gave Rick Santorum higher grades than almost any other Republican Senator.

Santorum has his weaknesses. But in this particular he is unassailable. What will the Romney people do next? Accuse him of having committed nepotism with his own sister?

Comments:


billy
Joined
Apr '11
billy

Accuse him of having committed nepotism with his own sister?

Did he really? My God what a monster!

Snow Bird
Joined
Feb '11
Snow Bird

Accuse him of having committed nepotism with his own sister?

Why not?

Since when does it have to be true?

Diane Ellis

Thank you for posting this informative link. What I understood to be a profligate spending record  (as outlined here) was always Sen. Santorum's biggest liability in my mind. In context it doesn't seem as bad...

Percival
Joined
Mar '11
Percival

Newt has been handling the attack ads the wrong way.  I think Rick hit the right tone with the "Rombo" ad.

One doesn't sputter with rage at negative ads -- one mocks them.

A soft answer turneth away wrath.  A soft answer and a giggle makes the wrathful look like a dope.

Cobalt Blue
Joined
Jul '11
Cobalt Blue

Thank you for calling attention to the piece. It helps to put the snippets of information from Romney's (or his PACs) ads in their proper perspective. The fact that Romney is making such flimsy claims highlights his precarious position: he's too afraid to attack Santorum on social issues, has no meaningful basis to attack Santorum's legislative record (except perhaps his various pro-union votes ... which he certainly wouldn't want to highlight in Michigan anyway), and has precious little to say about his own record that the Republican base wants to hear. Evitable indeed.


Joined
May '10
Matthew Bartle

On a tangential note, I can never remember what "spendthrift" means. Is the person being described as a spender, or thrifty?

Why does the first half of the word trump the second? We don't call people tallshort.

genferei
Joined
Oct '10
genferei

Matthew Bartle: On a tangential note, I can never remember what "spendthrift" means. Is the person being described as a spender, or thrifty?

Why does the first half of the word trump the second? We don't call people tallshort. · 0 minutes ago

The first part is the verb, the second the object of the verb, what is being spent - one's thrift or savings. Like 'scattergood' or 'spend-all'.

Gus Marvinson
Joined
Mar '11
Gus Marvinson

Even Romney's critics often make a point of his "unblemished character," "untarnished family life," or some such thing. But the man lies.

Something within him is tarnished or blemished.

Leslie Watkins
Joined
Sep '10
Leslie Watkins

What is Mrs. Santorum holding? Is it a cat? It's a very odd pose for a cat.


Joined
Feb '11
Xennady

Romney is lying about Santorum.

That says something about him, and it isn't good.

Character matters.

If you're the better candidate you don't need to lie about your opponents.

Chris Deleon
Joined
May '10
Chris Deleon

There's also the article on the Weekly Standard, "Going After Rick" by William Kristol, that pretty much takes this line of attack apart.

Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque
Leslie Watkins: What is Mrs. Santorum holding? Is it a cat? It's a very odd pose for a cat. · 6 minutes ago

You're joking, right?

She's hugging a child.  You are seeing the back of the child's head: it appears to be a girl with a ponytail (what you're seeing as a cat's tail).

Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque

Paul A. Rahe

Santorum has his weaknesses. But in this particular he is unassailable. 

This word, "unassailable": I do not think it means what you think it means.

After all, as Snow Bird says, since when does an attack have to be true?

Well, maybe, as Gus Marvinson and Xennady point out, if the attacker has some sort of ethical or moral qualms against smearing his opponents with lies.  But that seems not to be the case with the candidate assailing Santorum at present.

Fricosis Guy
Joined
Jun '11
Fricosis Guy

At this rate we'll need to encourage Mitt to stay in the race longer because his attacks help "toughen up" Santorum for the general.

James Of England
Joined
Apr '11
James Of England

For a little context on NTU ratings, see this NTU bill summary of Santorum's actions. You'll note that Santorum's bills were consistent in increasing spending, with trivial reductions. I can't find the underlying mechanisms for the NTU ratings, as opposed to bill summaries for past Congresses, but I suspect that Santorum had a bunch of tax cut proposals for the poor, along with "stimulative" tax breaks like his current manufacturing sector subsidy. Santorum gets an A, for instance, in the year that he opposed NAFTA and supported Davis Bacon. In that same year he authored bills by $13.5 billion and authored bills to cut spending by $0.

Edited on February 15, 2012 at 8:44pm
Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque
James Of England: For a little context on NTU ratings, see this NTU bill summary of Santorum's actions. You'll note that Santorum's bills were consistent in increasing spending, with trivial reductions. I can't find the NTU ratings, as opposed to bill summaries for past Congresses, but I suspect that Santorum had a bunch of tax cut proposals for the poor, along with "stimulative" tax breaks like his current manufacturing sector subsidy. · 3 minutes ago

See what I mean?  "Unassailable" is a very flexible concept.

Skyler
Joined
May '11
Skyler

The good news is that Romney is going to fight hard to beat Obama, and will use every means he can to stop Obama from continuing as president.

The bad news is that Romney will be president.

Mark Belling Fan
Joined
Sep '10
Mark Belling Fan

Matthew Bartle: On a tangential note, I can never remember what "spendthrift" means. Is the person being described as a spender, or thrifty?

Why does the first half of the word trump the second? We don't call people tallshort. · 34 minutes ago

Inflammable means flammable? What a country!

Chris Deleon
Joined
May '10
Chris Deleon

It's not just NTU.  OnTheIssues.org has Santorum to the right, both fiscally and socially, of Mitt Romney.

James Of England
Joined
Apr '11
James Of England

Stuart Creque

See what I mean?  "Unassailable" is a very flexible concept. · 1 minute ago

Just to be clear, are you suggesting that I'm being dishonest, or are you suggesting that Santorum's stereotype (the reason that Ben Domenech, no Romney fan and probably not repeating material given him by the Romney campaign, was opposed to Santorum back around Iowa) maybe isn't 100% false?


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In