Seven weeks ago, I reported on Heritage Action for America's effort to convince House members to sign onto a discharge petition forcing a floor vote to repeal the entire tottering edifice that is Obamacare.

How are we doing?

96 percent of House Republicans have signed Discharge Petition #11. Yet, not one Democrat has done so, including the 34 Dems who voted against Obamacare's passage. Heritage Action CEO Mike Needham comments in the Daily Caller:

There are two explanations as to why no Democrats have signed the discharge petition. They may have genuinely changed their mind on the merits of Obamacare and now support the law. If this is the case, they owe it to their constituents to say so and explain what new information caused them to change their position.

Alternatively, they have always supported Obamacare, but publicly opposed the measure to avoid political pain. Now, they are afraid of having another health care debate as they are aware the American people overwhelmingly oppose Obamacare. This means that they are implicitly endorsing the government’s takeover of the health care industry – 1/6th of the United States economy – which they claim to oppose. This scenario is why so many Americans are cynical about Washington.

Seems like the "Blue Dog" should be renamed the "Chameleon." It's good to have a bright-line difference between the two parties again.

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

Midget Faded Rattlesnake
Joined
Aug '10
Midget Faded Rattlesnake

I think there's a third possible reason Democrats who opposed the bill might not want to sign on for repeal:

They don't like ObamaCare but don't want the responsibility of having supported its repeal (the voters might like repeal, but their higher-ups in the party won't). That is to say, they are yellow.

"Chameleons" sounds like a pretty good name.

flownover
Joined
Aug '10
flownover

follow the money

they're all up for re-election and few dollars are coming from the right for the 34

finally, a gentleman's "D", means they'll pass, but just once

Midget Faded Rattlesnake
Joined
Aug '10
Midget Faded Rattlesnake

flownover: follow the money

Aug 23 at 4:36pm

Good point. How many big Democrat donors wouldn't be appalled by repeal?

Edited on Aug 23, 2010 at 4:43pm
Jason Hart
Joined
May '10
Jason Hart

What's terrific is that so few Republicans are being useless squishes on this issue. Sure, it's easy to be tough when the wind is at your back - but not so easy that I'd expect this kind of conservative unity.

Let's see if they do what must be done when it really matters!

Tom Lindholtz
Joined
May '10
Tom Lindholtz

I need a civics lesson. Can a discharge petition be used after the new Congress is sworn in, or can that only be used by the Congress that enacted the original bill?

George Savage
Tom Lindholtz: I need a civics lesson. Can a discharge petition be used after the new Congress is sworn in, or can that only be used by the Congress that enacted the original bill? · Aug 23 at 6:12pm

Tom, I'm not sure on that one. However, if there's a new Republican speaker, a discharge petition will be unnecessary.

George Savage
Midget Faded Rattlesnake: "Chameleons" sounds like a pretty good name. · Aug 23 at 4:34pm

MFR, I absolutely love it: the Blue Dog is henceforth the Blue Chameleon.

blue-chameleon
EJHill
Joined
May '10
EJHill
Tom Lindholtz: Can a discharge petition be used after the new Congress is sworn in, or can that only be used by the Congress that enacted the original bill?

Bills expire at the end of the Congress in which they were introduced. So any resolution not acted upon would have to be reintroduced in January.

Source: http://clerk.house.gov/legislative/legfaq.html


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In