Diane Ellis, Ed. · Mar 21, 2011 at 3:39pm

Behold this really awesome chart that shows the ionizing radiation dose a person can absorb from various sources. I think one of the author's goals is to demonstrate how small the one-day radiation dose was for people near the Fukushima reactors on 3/16 and 3/17.  But my takeaway is that it's bad to accumulate frequent flier miles and to participate in experimental brain scans (which I did a lot in college, for money). 

See a fully enlarged version by clicking here.

radiation
  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

flownover
Joined
Aug '10
flownover

Besides being jealous that one could get paid for irradiating their brain, thanks for exposing us to a healthy dose of reality. 

I bet that standing close enough to a media campaign to further cripple our energy production would melt your face like the Ark melting Gestapo apparatchiks.

GLDIII
Joined
Mar '11
GLDIII

Diane,

Just because one of your presumable left leaning college room mates extolled you to have your head examine, does not mean you should oblige them. Your right leaning brain seem fine to us.

As for the comparative radiation dosing chart, it is just further evidence of how technologically illiterate our society estimates the relative risks of their activities.

Bonus thought; Which will kill you first? An accident from flying in a commercial jet, or cancer from your accumulated dosing from flying?


Joined
Sep '10
Craig McLaughlin

I spent 8 moths on a nuclear submarine and received a whopping .0007 rem.

GLDIII: Diane,

Bonus thought; Which will kill you first? An accident from flying in a commercial jet, or cancer from your accumulated dosing from flying? · Mar 21 at 4:43pm

A car wreck on the way to the airport.


Joined
Sep '10
Craig McLaughlin

months

Lucy Pevensie
Joined
Nov '10
Lucy Pevensie

 I'm going to guess that your experimental brain scans were probably MRIs, rather than CTs, because there's not much research left to do on CT of the brain.  MRI=no ionizing radiation; imaging is done with magnetic fields.  While no one can really say what the long term effects are of being exposed to those magnetic fields, we have been mostly assuming that they are pretty safe.  I wouldn't worry too much about your exposure. 

Diane Ellis, Ed.
Lucy Pevensie:  I'm going to guess that your experimental brain scans were probably MRIs, rather than CTs, because there's not much research left to do on CT of the brain.  MRI=no ionizing radiation; imaging is done with magnetic fields.  While no one can really say what the long term effects are of being exposed to those magnetic fields, we have been mostly assuming that they are pretty safe.  I wouldn't worry too much about your exposure.  · Mar 21 at 5:02pm

You're right.  Now that I think about it, they were MRIs.  Good to know they're pretty safe!

Aaron Miller
Joined
May '10
Aaron Miller

Very informative. Thanks.

I've often wished I could get a brain scan just out of curiosity. I envy you, Diane.

Lileks has the look of a mad scientist. I bet he has the necessary hardware hidden in his basement.

Lucy Pevensie
Joined
Nov '10
Lucy Pevensie

Diane Ellis, Ed.

Lucy Pevensie:  I'm going to guess that your experimental brain scans were probably MRIs, rather than CTs, because there's not much research left to do on CT of the brain.  MRI=no ionizing radiation; imaging is done with magnetic fields.  While no one can really say what the long term effects are of being exposed to those magnetic fields, we have been mostly assuming that they are pretty safe.  I wouldn't worry too much about your exposure.  · Mar 21 at 5:02pm

You're right.  Now that I think about it, they were MRIs.  Good to know they're pretty safe! · Mar 21 at 5:25pm

Thought so.  There is a large amount of ongoing research on MRI or on the brain using MRI, Also it would be hard (not impossible, but quite hard) to get research approved that used CT-scale doses of radiation on healthy, young volunteers. 

Crabtree
Joined
Mar '11
Crabtree

Wonder how long until someone who doesn't know how to read a chart spots "banana" on the list of radiation sources and starts a scare?

Kennedy Smith
Joined
May '10
Kennedy Smith

Diane Ellis, Ed.

 · Mar 21 at 5:02pm

You're right.  Now that I think about it, they were MRIs.  Good to know they're pretty safe! · Mar 21 at 5:25pm

Well, dammit, here I thought you were going to develop superpowers.  If you do experience symptoms of nascent psychokinetic abilties, I could come up with some snazzy costume ideas.

Talleyrand
Joined
May '10
Talleyrand
Crabtree: Wonder how long until someone who doesn't know how to read a chart spots "banana" on the list of radiation sources and starts a scare? · Mar 21 at 6:06pm

If you have one banana a day then you get about 3.6 microSieverts in a year.

 1 & 1/2 packs of cigarettes per day, the radiation dose to the bronchial epithelium in areas of bifurcation is 8000 mrem per year.

For more Banana based dosage fun seehttp://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/02/16/going-bananas-over-radiation/

 Meanwhile the green Hydro plant in Japan has destroyed 1800 homes, and may have killed hundreds of people. I do not see the same level of outrage at that industry for the devastation it has caused.

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/dont-fall-victim-to-nuclear-phobia-20110320-1c24t.html

Edited on Mar 21, 2011 at 8:56pm

Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In