Needless to say that it's on exceptionally rare occasion that I find myself nodding in agreement with Sen. Schumer, but concerning our top foreign policy challenge going forward, I think he's right.

"I would guess that our No. 1 foreign-policy problem over the next 10 years will be Pakistan," Schumer told the CBS Early Show. "It's nuclear. It's poor. It's ethnically divided and it's never had good leadership."

Off to consult Dr. Victor Davis Hanson for his prognosis.

Comments:


anon_academic
Joined
Aug '10
anon_academic

Pakistan is obviously India's #1 foreign policy problem and Afghanistan's #1 foreign policy problem for the next 10 years, but whether it will be America's #1 foreign policy problem is in part a function of how much we choose to allow it to be our problem. I think it is entirely possible to assume a fairly comfortable containment posture by cutting off the spigot of bribes and aircraft supplies, pulling our troops out of Af-Pak (with only the occasional air strike from carriers or bases elsewhere in central Asia), and refusing to accept Pakistani passports.  

Edited on May 6, 2011 at 10:07pm
Pseudodionysius
Joined
Sep '10
Pseudodionysius

Mexico would be #2.

anon_academic
Joined
Aug '10
anon_academic
Pseudodionysius: Mexico would be #2. · May 6 at 1:29pm

Exactly. You're talking about a country with which we have strong cultural, economic, and in many cases familial ties --- not to mention a long and porous border. Unlike Pakistan this is not a country whose problems we can avoid.


Joined
Feb '11
Hang On

anon_academic

Pseudodionysius: Mexico would be #2. · May 6 at 1:29pm

Exactly. You're talking about a country with which we have strong cultural, economic, and in many cases familial ties --- not to mention a long and porous border. Unlike Pakistan this is not a country whose problems we can avoid. · May 6 at 1:37pm

Could not agree more. Pakistan is a problem for us only because it is a self-inflicted problem.

David Williamson
Joined
Mar '11
David Williamson
Pseudodionysius: Mexico would be #2. · May 6 at 1:29pm

I'd put it at #1, cause it is so close.

I'd also be a little concerned about Iran, Syria, Yemen, Egypt - hard to rank em. It's like there is some Global ideology, movement, religion, or something.

Schumer is taking the usual Politician's short-term, narrow, view. It's maybe why Rick Santorum is no longer in the Senate - he takes the wider view.

Edited on May 6, 2011 at 10:56pm

Joined
Dec '10
Nickolas

The primary reason Afghanistan was not a success after we toppled the Taliban in  the fall-winter of 2001-2002 is Pakistan.

If not for Pakistan no one would give a crap about Afghanistan.

The only reason we, and NATO, are still in Afghanistan is Pakistan. Our efforts in Afghanistan are all about Pakistan.

Karzai knows this. It is why he is comfortable with repeatedly giving Obama the finger ever since Obama publicly threw him under the bus in the fall of 2009.

Edited on May 7, 2011 at 2:44am
John Marzan
Joined
Oct '10
John Marzan

1) Pakistan

2) Iran (until the mullahs are overthrown)

3) The Cartels

Peter Gøthgen
Joined
Feb '11
Peter Gøthgen

John Marzan: 1) Pakistan

2) Iran (until the mullahs are overthrown)

3) The Cartels · May 6 at 7:30pm

I would've put Iran at #1.  Though I definitely agree that that's only until the right revolution comes along.  With the right people in charge, Iran could be a great ally.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In