George Savage · Jan 29, 2011 at 9:37am

Not exactly news to the Ricochescenti, but clarifying nonetheless: Richard Foster, Medicare's Chief Actuary, provides a remarkably brief and direct answer to Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA) in the House a couple of days ago on two of ObamaCare's core promises.

Note that the Congressional Budget Office remains Ezra Klein's preferred source for analysis--insisting against the evidence on the myriad magical virtues of ObamaCare--because the CBO is required to accept at face value whatever premises Congress puts before it, no matter how absurd.  For example, if Congress told CBO to credit five-and-a-half foot tall middle-aged men with the jumping ability of youthful seven-foot-plus athletes--lighter weight canceling out superior height--then CBO would score me as a potential NBA star.  That wouldn't make it true, except for Mr. Klein.

Mr. Foster, as an independent actuary, is able to formulate his own opinion.

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

Kervinlee
Joined
May '10
Kervinlee

Since I'm not much of a consumer of the "main-stream media," I wonder if this telling exchange has received the wider coverage it deserves? Probably not, I'll bet.

We've been had, again, and we're stuck with this turkey, I'm afraid.

Kenneth
Joined
Jul '10
Kenneth

Just as long as I get my pony....

Cas Balicki
Joined
Jun '10
Cas Balicki

Forward this to any insisting that Canada's healthcare delivery system is the way to go.

George Savage
Cas Balicki: Forward this to any insisting that Canada's healthcare delivery system is the way to go. · Jan 29 at 3:33pm

The wages of socialism.  Once prices are capped, patients wind up paying in other ways.

Cas Balicki
Joined
Jun '10
Cas Balicki

George Savage

Cas Balicki: Forward this to any insisting that Canada's healthcare delivery system is the way to go. · Jan 29 at 3:33pm

The wages of socialism.  Once prices are capped, patients wind up paying in other ways. · Jan 29 at 6:17pm

It's worse than capped prices although that is a significant problem. It's the rationing of capital that probably hurts most. When you get a capital intensive industry such as medicine and limit capital contributers to the government by disallowing private investment, you cannot possibly hope to keep up with demand for the services provided.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In