Ben Domenech · January 6, 2012 at 4:45pm

So by now you've all seen that MoveOn.org anti-Romney ad, which gives a preview of the coming year in attack ads I fear. Now Reuters follows up on the story, painting an unsightly picture of the Kansas City steel mill's failed turnaround. My question is: How does Romney plan to respond to this thoroughly predictable line of attack?

Soon after, in October 1993, Bain Capital, co-founded by Mitt Romney, became majority shareholder in a steel mill that had been operating since 1888. It was a gamble. The old mill, renamed GS Technologies, needed expensive updating, and demand for its products was susceptible to cycles in the mining industry and commodities markets.

Less than a decade later, the mill was padlocked and some 750 people lost their jobs. Workers were denied the severance pay and health insurance they'd been promised, and their pension benefits were cut by as much as $400 a month.

What's more, a federal government insurance agency had to pony up $44 million to bail out the company's underfunded pension plan. Nevertheless, Bain profited on the deal, receiving $12 million on its $8 million initial investment and at least $4.5 million in consulting fees.

There’s no question that in his career, Romney has created wealth. But among the broader voting populace, no impression exists that he created jobs. He has to correct that by connecting the two - that by creating wealth and profit he created jobs elsewhere even as some companies died - before it defines him.

His campaign needs a better response than the one they’re currently giving, that’s for sure. Perhaps Romney should give a speech like Danny DeVito’s in Other People's Money?

It'd be a start, at least.

Comments:


Pseudodionysius
Joined
Sep '10
Pseudodionysius

The Moveon.org ad is easy to counter, for a candidate with confidence and conviction. Mitt's been tagged as being "stuck in the 50's": what his team needs to do is steal a page from the late Steve Jobs's Cupertino experience and craft a message that resonates with a different generation.

Unfortunately, I'm not sure that he can do it.

flownover
Joined
Aug '10
flownover

The coincidental release of this story by moveon.org and Reuters sure make it appear that Ezra Klein is a busy man again. Looks like Journolist is up and at 'em just in time for an election. 


Joined
Dec '11
Guruforhire

 Both arguements are substantively true.

Edited on January 6, 2012 at 5:02pm
Frozen Chosen
Joined
Aug '10
Frozen Chosen

Seems like if the Dems wanted to face Mitt in the general they would hold their fire on this sort of stuff until after he gets nominated.

Great clip, btw. 

Misthiocracy
Joined
Aug '10
Misthiocracy

Was New England Wire & Cable owned by the same stockholders as Teldar Paper?

Trace
Joined
May '10
Trace Urdan

He wins by rejecting the terms of the debate. I think this 1970s retro take on the economy is an almost perfect tee-up to describe why the current administration's thinking has us mired in recession. I think most Americans understand capitalism and the ridiculous Gordon Gekko trope is discredited. Every Bain deal isn't perfect, but that's what risking capital is all about. Likewise every job isn't guaranteed for life but that's why social mobility and labor mobility are important.


Joined
Dec '11
Guruforhire

Frozen Chosen: Seems like if the Dems wanted to face Mitt in the general they would hold their fire on this sort of stuff until after he gets nominated.

Great clip, btw.  · Jan 6 at 8:04am

Scare tactic to keep blue collar white voters from getting to enfranchised in the republican party, and sort out their overwhelming problem there.


Joined
Apr '11
Jonathan Cast

I'm a big fan of free-market capitalism, but this bit makes me nervous:

What's more, a federal government insurance agency had to pony up $44 million to bail out the company's underfunded pension plan. Nevertheless, Bain profited on the deal, receiving $12 million on its $8 million initial investment and at least $4.5 million in consulting fees.

If this is accurate, Bain Capital should have had its investment wiped out, rather than making a profit.  And receiving consulting fees from a failing company you've invested in sounds like the kind of self-dealing that is the legitimate target of financial regulation.

Bluenoser
Joined
Dec '11
Bluenoser

First off know that I am commenting kind of blindly here as I cannot see the videos in question behind my firewall at work.  My comment is this: 

Why isn’t enough to posit that those 750 some workers had a job for close to a decade longer than they otherwise would have, had it not been for Bain Capital’s investment?

Ben Domenech

Jonathan Cast: I'm a big fan of free-market capitalism, but this bit makes me nervous:

What's more, a federal government insurance agency had to pony up $44 million to bail out the company's underfunded pension plan. Nevertheless, Bain profited on the deal, receiving $12 million on its $8 million initial investment and at least $4.5 million in consulting fees.

If this is accurate, Bain Capital should have had its investment wiped out, rather than making a profit.  And receiving consulting fees from a failing company you've invested in sounds like the kind of self-dealing that is the legitimate target of financial regulation. · Jan 6 at 8:18am

You've hit on the real danger here. It's not just that this hurts among blue collar community. It hurts among those of us who are against bailouts (in this case via pension guarantees) in all their forms.


Joined
Dec '11
Guruforhire

 The more I think about it, both are cautionary tales about the hobbesian jungle.  If the town and unions go too far, and break the compact screw em.  But if you lead with screw em, there isnt any reason to not bleed the company dry is there?

There has to be a certain amount of intra-group loyalty for a society to survive.  Towns like Rochester and Detroit and soon california who bleed the golden goose dry dont deserve a golden goose, but the opposite is true as well.  Dont expect people to not get while the getting is good if at the first sign of trouble you are just going to cut bait and run.

Besides wouldnt it suck to get out of the copper business just a few short years before essentially every company in the world went on huge copper cabling projects, and the pancea of fiber optics and wireless never materializes?

I see your other people's money and raise you a sexy boots.

Michael Tee
Joined
Jul '10
Michael Tee

That speech doesn't work at all.

He's talking to the investors of the company, not the employees who will be out of work.

(But we'll retrain the field engineers to be HR managers!) 

That response, one might say if one were on the left, is a typical GOP screed of favoring the rich investor class over the working man.


Joined
Feb '11
Hang On

I think talking about what happened in 1993 would be ludicrous. I mean, that was almost 20 years ago. And the world has changed.

Romney would be far better off talking about how steel industry in the US can be revived and why he and not Obama would be better off for reviving steel and other manufacturing jobs. Steel will revive because it is a resource-intensive industry requiring iron ore and energy.  Obama's EPA will restrict iron ore production because the EPA hates using up non-renewable resources, which iron ore is.  Obama's EPA will be opposed to fracking and horizontal drilling and try to ban it rather than trying to mitigate the environmental effects which would give American gas drillers an even larger competitive advantage when Europeans decide to exploit their natural gas. In addition, Romney should talk about decreasing American corporate tax rates which place Americans at a large disadvantage compared to other OECD and NIC countries. 

That and not something about what happened in the last century is what Romney should talk about.

Edited on January 6, 2012 at 5:33pm

Joined
Feb '11
Hang On

Jonathan Cast: I'm a big fan of free-market capitalism, but this bit makes me nervous:

What's more, a federal government insurance agency had to pony up $44 million to bail out the company's underfunded pension plan. Nevertheless, Bain profited on the deal, receiving $12 million on its $8 million initial investment and at least $4.5 million in consulting fees.

If this is accurate, Bain Capital should have had its investment wiped out, rather than making a profit.  And receiving consulting fees from a failing company you've invested in sounds like the kind of self-dealing that is the legitimate target of financial regulation. · Jan 6 at 8:18am

Who says America has free-market capitalism. It doesn't. And never will.

flownover
Joined
Aug '10
flownover

What do the American people know about the steel business ? Here's Bethlehem Steel, it's a good picture of the steel business in this country for the last 40 years- dead.

bethlehem steel
Misthiocracy
Joined
Aug '10
Misthiocracy

Jonathan Cast: I'm a big fan of free-market capitalism, but this bit makes me nervous:

What's more, a federal government insurance agency had to pony up $44 million to bail out the company's underfunded pension plan. Nevertheless, Bain profited on the deal, receiving $12 million on its $8 million initial investment and at least $4.5 million in consulting fees.

If this is accurate, Bain Capital should have had its investment wiped out, rather than making a profit.  And receiving consulting fees from a failing company you've invested in sounds like the kind of self-dealing that is the legitimate target of financial regulation. · Jan 6 at 8:18am

Agreed. Romney's biggest "challege", IMHO, is that Bain Capital has received it's fair share of taxpayer bailouts and government subsidies over the years.

Misthiocracy
Joined
Aug '10
Misthiocracy

flownover: What do the American people know about the steel business ? Here's Bethlehem Steel, it's a good picture of the steel business in this country for the last 40 years- dead. 

Is that a photograph or a painting?

DrewInWisconsin
Joined
Aug '11
DrewInWisconsin
flownover: The coincidental release of this story by moveon.org and Reuters sure make it appear that Ezra Klein is a busy man again. Looks like Journolist is up and at 'em just in time for an election.  · Jan 6 at 7:57am

Was there ever any doubt? It worked so well the first time, I can't imagine they wouldn't do it again.


Joined
Dec '11
Guruforhire

Misthiocracy

Jonathan Cast: I'm a big fan of free-market capitalism, but this bit makes me nervous:

What's more, a federal government insurance agency had to pony up $44 million to bail out the company's underfunded pension plan. Nevertheless, Bain profited on the deal, receiving $12 million on its $8 million initial investment and at least $4.5 million in consulting fees.

If this is accurate, Bain Capital should have had its investment wiped out, rather than making a profit.  And receiving consulting fees from a failing company you've invested in sounds like the kind of self-dealing that is the legitimate target of financial regulation. · Jan 6 at 8:18am

Agreed. Romney's biggest "challege", IMHO, is that Bain Capital has received it's fair share of taxpayer bailouts and government subsidies over the years. · Jan 6 at 8:44am

I wonder how long we find out bain capitals lobbying history?  Or do we really think they were always on the side of angels?


Joined
Feb '11
david foster

Flownover...the steel business in the US isn't dead at all. Companies that innovated with mini-mills and continuous casting, such as Nucor, are very much alive. 


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In