Unknown

From Michael Barone's latest column:

Last week, Republicans proved they are not a governing party....

A governing party would have, reluctantly, passed Speaker John Boehner's Plan B, which would have preserved the current tax rates on everyone with incomes under $1 million.

Passage would have put Senate Democrats on the spot, since they voted for a similar measure in 2010. They might have engaged in negotiations with Boehner that could have been more productive than his negotiations with Barack Obama this month and in the summer of 2011.

A cruel question to ask on the merriest of holidays, perhaps, but a central one all the same:  Is Michael Barone correct?  Is the GOP too short-sighted and ideological to govern in the national interest?  Or did the conservatives in the House instead, perhaps, make a shrewd decision, calculating that in time Americans will return to a party that stands on principle?

I myself, alas, incline toward Barone.  You?

Comments:



Joined
May '12
Al Sparks

I guess I don't care.  In the end, the arithmetic doesn't add up.  It's no longer about the taxes.  It's about spending and entitlement reform.

We're headed for some sort of cliff whatever they do in Congress, unless real entitlement reform is addressed.  And nothing they're doing right now addresses that.

Mike LaRoche
Joined
Oct '10
Mike LaRoche

I have had quite enough of compromise and pragmatism.  Now is the time to stand on principle.  And if the majority of Americans are inclined to choose the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy - as Churchill accurately described socialism - then so be it.

EJHill
Joined
May '10
EJHill

A party with no soul, no direction and no conviction can't govern. Governing isn't just voting in a bloc to prove you can be herded by your "leader."

Benjamin Glaser
Joined
Jul '12
Benjamin Glaser

I wonder how many of these Washington insiders who make their living off the political machine and the circus it creates actually want to see the government smaller? 

Jimmy Carter
Joined
Jul '10
Jimmy Carter

....in time Americans will return to a party that stands on principle

Oh, that's rich.

Return? To principle?

Pray tell, which party would that be?

cdor
Joined
Jun '10
cdor

No the GOP is not capable of governing. Neither are the DEMS. That is why we have a debt of $16T and deficit non- budgets of $1.5T as far as our eyes can see. This last non-vote on a bill that would solve nothing means nothing. Goodness gracious, did the esteemed Michael Barone just wake up?

skipsul
Joined
Mar '11
skipsul

Boehner's Plan B would have cut ZERO spending, it wasn't a compromise, it was a surrender.

Boehner would have been better demanding that Barry surrender on something substantive - make the deal painful for both sides.  The Dems gave nothing, and Repubs gave symbolism.

Better not to vote at all in that case.

Anyone see the column a couple of days ago basically saying Barry was not willing to compromise anywhere?  Just like in 2009 his attitude was "I win, I'm not moving".  

Any deal where the Dems lose nothing is foolish at this point.


Joined
Mar '12
Curt North

Agree 110% with cdor, we haven't a choice for anyone capable of governing.  Tax hikes here or there, or tax cuts here or there for that matter, they just don't really matter as long as entitlements are largely left alone.  I'm afraid this arguments and worries about a fiscal cliff are just wind, nothing is solved and nothing will be with our current structure in place.  So once agasin the can is kicked down the road.  The real question is, what's at the end of that road, what form does our transformation take?

Nick Stuart
Joined
May '10
Nick Stuart

The "fiscal cliff" coming up in a few days is really just a fiscal seam in the linoleum. The real fiscal cliff is when nobody will buy US debt anymore and we can't finance the trillion dollar annual deficit.

I agree with Barone the GOP as currently constituted is incapable of governing/leadership, but for different reasons. All they've been doing since the election is negotiating with themselves. They could have passed whatever they could agree on out of the house and dropped it in the Senate and President's lap.

It's an epic cluster-up. As the line from Full Metal Jacket goes "it's a great big [CoC word] sandwich, and we're all gonna have to take a bite."

Fred Cole
Joined
Nov '11
Fred Cole

When it doubt: Pessimism. 

But anybody observing the Republicans know that they're utter, utter clown shoes.

curtmilr
Joined
Sep '12
curtmilr

skipsul: Boehner's Plan B would have cut ZERO spending, it wasn't a compromise, it was a surrender.

Boehner would have been better demanding that Barry surrender on something substantive - make the deal painful for both sides.  The Dems gave nothing, and Repubs gave symbolism.

Better not to vote at all in that case. . .

 Any deal where the Dems lose nothing is foolish at this point. · 0 minutes ago

Dead on target, skipsul! Way off base, Peter!

Senator Reid had already said he would not bring Plan B to a vote, and Obama had said if it passed both houses, he would veto it!

So what was the purpose of the violation of stated GOP principle on taxes? A meaningless fig leaf? No, this was a cowardly surrender by an unprincipled Speaker lacking the spine to fight for genuine reform.

The government debt bubble will begin bursting in the next couple of years. Perhaps even sooner if we don't vigorously cut spending and encourage private sector growth. Plan B did neither! Better to vote "present" and allow Obama & Reid to pass their worthless programs, but avoid complicity in the criminal actions.

EThompson
Joined
Dec '11
EThompson
Al Sparks: I guess I don't care.  In the end, the arithmetic doesn't add up.  It's no longer about the taxes. It's about spending and entitlement reform.

Exactement! The sobering reality is that the top 2% of earners in this country could be taxed 100% of their income and it wouldn't begin to make a dent in the deficit.

Mike LaRoche
Joined
Oct '10
Mike LaRoche

EThompson

Al Sparks: I guess I don't care.  In the end, the arithmetic doesn't add up.  It's no longer about the taxes. It's about spending and entitlement reform.

Exactement! The sobering reality is that the top 2% of earners in this country could be taxed 100% of their income and it wouldn't begin to make a dent in the deficit. · 3 minutes ago

And at least 51% of the population is too stupid to realize that basic truth, distracted by panem et circenses.

David John
Joined
Nov '10
David John

The Republicans are now identified with the rich in the public mind. Republicans should be identified instead as a party of principles.

I like those proposals by which the Republicans vote 'present', let the Left run riot, and hope to rise again out of the ensuing disaster. 

God help us, all.

(Oh... and Merry Christmas)

Edited on December 26, 2012 at 3:46am
Matthew Gilley
Joined
May '10
Matthew Gilley

I would love to chime in but, alas, I am one of the unwashed Huns from a district represented by someone who actually believes in what he is selling, so I am disqualified to offer an opinion to my fainthearted Republican betters. Keep squealing in panic, brothers and sisters. Those of us in states too foolish to follow your wise counsel will be just fine. 

Mike LaRoche
Joined
Oct '10
Mike LaRoche
Matthew Gilley: I would love to chime in but, alas, I am one of the unwashed Huns from a district represented by someone who actually believes in what he is selling, so I am disqualified to offer an opinion to my fainthearted Republican betters. Keep squealing in panic, brothers and sisters. Those of us in states too foolish to follow your wise counsel will be just fine.  · 1 minute ago

God bless South Carolina...and Texas!

Fricosis Guy
Joined
Jun '11
Fricosis Guy

I'm convinced that the nature of the Bush tax cuts set up the Mother of all Bootlegger and Baptist scams.  Once expiration was imminent, conservatives offered up the moonshine of temporary tax cuts as protection against liberals' threat of higher rates.  Liberals use those extended tax cuts -- focusing only on those for the rich -- as justification for more spending.  Next year...the cycle begins again.

Don't have enough time to write up a post, but Google "Bootlegger and Baptist" and connect the dots. 


Joined
Aug '12
Joe Boyle

In four years we'll have over twenty trillion in debt and over seventy trillion in unfunded  liabilities. I'm having a hard time caring about Boehner and his feckless antics.


Joined
Dec '12
Dr. Nick

I feel it is imperative to iterate that the GOP is but 1/2 of 1/3 of the government at this time. Do the individuals that proclaim their conservative bona fides on this website really endow the 1/6 with such power? The people cast their vote in November for the party and direction that they desire. I understand the temptation to 'hold the line' on the increase in taxes, but is it really a position that the GOP will be able to keep steadfast? I doubt it.

On the other hand, if the GOP concedes for higher taxes on the upper income earners alone and allows for the under 1 million dollar earners per annum pay their 'fair share,' what is the downside? We betray Norquist, who has already approved Plan B? No, all we do is limit the MSM and their minions a talking point that they will no doubt propagate like the melting of glaciers and the destruction of Gaia. There are few positions of principle that the conservative base may take with the current power base.

Stephen Hall
Joined
Nov '12
Stephen Hall

Too many people see no connection between spending and taxes; government has become a cost-free goodies dispenser. This is the basic corruption at the core of the country's finances. Maybe it's time people were reminded, by tax increases, that the goodies are not free. The GOP has occasionally contributed to this corruption by championing tax cuts while increasing spending.

If the people are made to actually pay for the goodies, perhaps they will begin to lose their enthusiasm for big government. The American people recently made the terrible choice for a larger government. They should be given what they voted for .... good and hard.*

*(H. L. Mencken, A Little Book in C Major: "Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard".)

Edited on December 26, 2012 at 4:17am

Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In