So let's imagine that I was asked a really interesting follow-up question on Fox, like the obvious one: "Why were those first two years under Thatcher such a complete disaster? Why didn't it work right away?" I figured you'd all be wondering, so I gave it a shot--after washing all that makeup off. 

By the way, I misspoke at about 0.52, I meant to say "corporations," not "banks," but I couldn't be bothered to re-record it. 

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

Not JMR
Joined
Nov '10
Not JMR

There are some bits missing between "they weren't measuring things correctly" and "QED." Can you elaborate a bit?

Claire Berlinski, Ed.

I elaborate at length in the book, check out the chapter called "The Sledgehammer."

James Gawron
Joined
Dec '10
James Gawron

Claire, there was someone I once knew who would always ask me if I liked "this look".  I would tell her that I liked her in the make up and out of the make up.  I liked her in the evening dress and in the blue jeans.  I just liked her.  But enough about me, now to money.

The Monetarist Equation is about as complicated as Boyle's Gas Law.  You know STP (standard temperature & pressure).  That's probably why they call it inflation.  You have hit the nail on the head.  Defining what is money is the real challenge.  I have some thoughts of my own.  You are providing me with an opportunity so I may try to write a short essay and put it on the Member Feed.  Thanks

By the way you were terrific we need to appreciate the Iron Lady now more then ever.

Pseudodionysius
Joined
Sep '10
Pseudodionysius
Claire Berlinski, Ed.: I elaborate at length in the book, check out the chapter called "The Sledgehammer." · Dec 7 at 2:10pm

Soundtrack for that chapter here.

Leslie Watkins
Joined
Sep '10
Leslie Watkins

With makeup, Mardi Gras beads; without, hand-crafted, fine jewelry. ... In watching these clips, I'm amazed by how these interviewers get the title wrong, and I'm thinking maybe it has to do with Andrew Sullivan's Why Obama Matters rattling around in their memory. ...  Also, I don't know Thatcher at all at all at all, but even I could see that Streep's pose was not at all close to Thatcher's. Streep looks startled, a bit terrified, whereas Thatcher looks calm, firm, clear-headed. I laughed outloud when Varney said Streep got the look exactly right and you said, "The hair." HA! HA!

CJRun
Joined
Dec '10
CJRun

Yay for the answer and doffing the necklace!

Undecided on the absence of "Fox Hot", as it needs some form of visual transition.  I suggest footy pajamas, to set the less formal tone that draws the viewer in for the deep revelation.  Perhaps followed by encouraging viewers to hide media peronalities' clothing in the freezer.

Sisyphus
Joined
Jul '10
Sisyphus

I'm going full bore into the Mardi Gras beads market. Way better than Obamadollars.

Claire Berlinski, Ed.

I'm just cross that they didn't put "Ricochet" on the screen--I make a very big point of asking them to. 

Pseudodionysius
Joined
Sep '10
Pseudodionysius
Claire Berlinski, Ed.: I'm just cross that they didn't put "Ricochet" on the screen--I make a very big point of asking them to.  · Dec 7 at 5:09pm

They don't want to be accused of "workplace violence" by the White House.

Jimmy Carter
Joined
Jul '10
Jimmy Carter

More please.

Sisyphus
Joined
Jul '10
Sisyphus
Claire Berlinski, Ed.: I'm just cross that they didn't put "Ricochet" on the screen--I make a very big point of asking them to.  · Dec 7 at 5:09pm

Um, you need to remix the video. You need Ricochet on the screen of this one.

Mike LaRoche
Joined
Oct '10
Mike LaRoche

In the book I also enjoyed your story about Lt. Col. Stanislav Yefgrafovich Petrov.

Douglas
Joined
Mar '11
Douglas

Quit worrying about the makeup thing. You're easy on the eyes, regardless ;)

Pseudodionysius
Joined
Sep '10
Pseudodionysius
Mike LaRoche: In the book I also enjoyed your story about Lt. Col. Stanislav Yefgrafovich Petrov. · Dec 7 at 5:45pm

That reminds me I have to actually *finish* the book on my Kindle.

Joseph Eagar
Joined
Oct '10
Joseph Eagar

This is the classical problem with monetarism.  Measuring the money supply over time is virtually impossible.  Did the Thatcher people really believe in it?  Our own experiment with monetarism in the early 80s was a smokescreen; the Fed wanted to limit the political blowback from the high interest rates needed to kill inflation--no one actually believed in monetarism itself (Paul Volcker and others have admitted as much, and you can even read them discuss it in the 1980/81 FOMC meeting minutes).

This is why Taylor rules were invented.

Edited on Dec 8, 2011 at 12:25am
Not JMR
Joined
Nov '10
Not JMR

Addendum: Purchased.

Ben Domenech

This is excellent, Claire. I really hate it when interviewers never ask followups to dig into these things.

And makeup is overrated.


Joined
Sep '11
HPVDV

Loved the f/u.  Will read that chapter also.  

P.S. You're even lovelier without makeup.

Casey
Joined
Mar '11
Casey

See... I knew cramming your knowledge into four frequently interrupted minutes drove you crazy.

Claire Berlinski, Ed.
Joseph Eagar: This is the classical problem with monetarism.  Measuring the money supply over time is virtually impossible.  Did the Thatcher people really believe in it?  

It's not clear that Thatcher even fully understood it--but the basic concept sounded right to her, and no doubt she truly believed in it. 


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In