The video snippet of Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr. giving a speech on the floor of Congress in which he asserts that by amending the Constitution the nation's job ills might be cured is instructive. It is, first and foremost, an ideal example of Unintentional Comedy and how it can brighten an otherwise cloud-covered day. It is also incredibly revealing as to what Rep. Jackson - and presumably many of his liberal colleagues and contemporaries - believes is the nature of rights. Where a conservative philosophy would endorse the idea that rights are self-evident and need to be preserved, this liberal philosophy believes they can only be bestowed.

This video appears to be edited to a significant degree. That said, the basics of the Congressman's statements seem to be able to overcome any crude slice and dice job in Final Cut Pro.

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

Kenneth
Joined
Jul '10
Kenneth

He makes Charlie Sheen seem lucid by comparison.

Dave Molinari
Joined
Jun '10
Dave Molinari

If he was wearing a wizard hat and holding a magic wand, it would actually give his argument more credibility. Looks like Sr. taught Jr. well.

Kenneth
Joined
Jul '10
Kenneth

But where's the famous Jackson rhyming?

It's not the veins in your brains

It's the drains on the trains...

Richard VanderHoek
Joined
Sep '10
Richard VanderHoek

Wow!  Just... Wow!

It's like, well, you know, the Constitution has these, like, magically awesome powers and can, you know, like, just create things - well, you know, good things, like jobs and stuff. 

John Doba
Joined
Feb '11
John Doba

Sounds like he's talking about FDR's Economic Bill of Rights. As part of that, FDR also proposed a "right" to leisure. Of course he didn't specify how much leisure one would be entitled to. How many slackers would such a right create? 

How many doctors/houses/student iPods, would these rights create? Who can say for sure; but all that's necessary to realize them, once the several germane constitutional amendments pass their passage-ordeal, is for the necessary funding to be procured from taxpayers. Of course, we'd need to set up new bureaucracies to distribute the goods and services.  No problema, for pols of the Jackson type.  

One might point him to the 9th and 10th Amendments. The Founders did the best they could on short notice, in the context of the regional/North-South conflicts already evident. But it's not perfect; if it were, we'd not be in this monumental, largely self-induced debt crisis. Rep Jackson is just speaking from within the dominant trend of interpretation: the government's role is to make the lives of the citizens better. If we have to bestow new rights, fine. Make it so, Jackson

Roque Nuevo
Joined
Mar '11
Roque Nuevo

This is just out-and-out socialism. Nothing more, or less. FDR's Economic Bill of Rights was just a tepid attempt at putting us up to speed with vanguard nations, like the USSR.

Read the UN Universal Charter of Human Rights. Half of it is about so-called economic rights. Why is that, do you think?

What Rep Jackson is missing is that, yes, the state can bestow these rights on its citizens but that's when they stop being citizens and start being slaves of the state. He says you get a lot of rights as a slave.

You get the right to be free of hunger. So here's your kilo of lentils and rice. Still hungry? You must be some kind of saboteur.

You get the right to an education. So start memorizing the words of our great leader. Still curious? Want even more knowledge? You must be a Zionist spy!

You get the right to a roof over your head. Here's a place for you and your family that we stole off some Zionist spies.

Do people really listen to anything this guy has to say? Well [extreme expletive]! They deserve each other.

Roque Nuevo
Joined
Mar '11
Roque Nuevo
Dave Molinari: If he was wearing a wizard hat and holding a magic wand, it would actually give his argument more credibility. Looks like Sr. taught Jr. well. · Mar 8 at 7:34pm

Funny! Thank you!

Diane Ellis, Ed.

Jonesness!!! So happy to see you here. Welcome, sir.

This man and his ideology are absurd. 

raycon
Joined
Oct '10
raycon

So, Jimminy Cricket is now a member of congress.  When you wish upon a star, makes no difference who you are, blah, blah, blah.  To quote Thomas Jefferson  “A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take away everything you have.”

Thanks for the reminder Jesse Jr., or is it Jimminy?

Erik Larsen
Joined
Jan '11
Erik Larsen

 If the Chinese are willing to fund it in perpetuity, fine with me.  I'm sure the workin' guys and gals there screwing heads on dolls 18 hours a day six days a week have no problem with it.

KC Mulville
Joined
Jan '11
KC Mulville

A need is not a right. If you need housing, that's why you get a job and work hard.

Joseph Eagar
Joined
Oct '10
Joseph Eagar

KC Mulville, in theory, housing is supposed to be one of the three methods of redistributing wealth that actually works (education, healthcare, housing).  Unfortunately, practice has shown it does not; nations with rights to housing suffer massive housing shortages.

I've not watched the video (my stomach feels too queasy to listen to sleezy left-wingers today) but I imagine it's the "we deserve this! thus, we need rulers to make it happen!" nonsense that occasionally spills forth from the left.

Erik Larsen, I've been wondering about that too.  Normally, the Chinese would be exploiting us, not the other way around--but will we actually pay any of that debt back (and refrain from inflating it away)?  There's something obscene about stealing the life savings of poor people in other countries.

Jonesness
Joined
Mar '11
Jonesness

 Ms. Ellis, I hope that I am not "this man" in your post. And of course, happy to be here!

Chris Deleon
Joined
May '10
Chris Deleon
Dave Molinari: If he was wearing a wizard hat and holding a magic wand, it would actually give his argument more credibility.

Can't say it much better than that.  I'm sorry to have to use this word, but Jesse Jackson, Jr. is an economic ignoramus.  A believer in fairy tales.  If you just wish for it hard enough, and BELEEEEVE, (and pass an amendment to the Constitution just for good measure), it will be conjured into existence!


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In