Three weeks ago, I posted from Japan on the approaching collision between widespread anti-nuclear power sentiment and spiking summertime demand for electricity.  A full thirty percent of Japan's generating capacity resides in its idled nuclear power plants and it's getting hot out there, leading Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda to push for getting the electrons flowing ahead of likely blackouts.

Well, here we go.

TOKYO – Tens of thousands of protesters brought central Tokyo to a halt Monday, marching through busy streets to demand the government abandon nuclear power.  Demonstrators, bused in from all across Japan, gathered at the capital city’s Yoyogi Park holding “No nukes” signs amid sweltering temperatures, in the largest anti-nuclear rally since the Fukushima disaster triggered 3 reactor meltdowns 16 months ago.

Monday’s event, led by Nobel-winning author Kenzaburo Oe and musician Ryuichi Sakamoto, was the latest in a string of protests that have ignited the anti-nuclear movement in Japan. Protest organizers said nearly 170,000 rallied on the national holiday, though the Tokyo Metropolitan police said the number was closer to 75,000.

I just finished Dennis Prager's book Still the Best Hope: Why the World Needs American Values to Triumph over the weekend.  Infused with Prager's wisdom, I see this as a clear case of emotion--the Left is mainly concerned with feelings--trumping facts.  Engineering a nationwide electric power grid is a matter of cost and risk tradeoffs, not absolute security.  A dispassionate look at the Fukushima disaster--where a coast-side nuclear power plant was destroyed by the largest earthquake and tsunami in Japanese history--reveals a success story.  The disaster far exceeded the design limits of the plant, literally wiping surrounding communities from the map, and yet radiation, while a lingering problem at the site, didn't kill a soul. 

Let's state the fatality score clearly--Tsunami: 19,000; Nuclear Power: 0.  

In the immediate aftermath of the Fukushima Daichi meltdown, many of the same people protesting nuclear power today predicted a radiologic Gotterdammerung.  Didn't happen.  Nevertheless, nuclear power is the problem, somehow, since it feels dangerous or warlike, or something.  

I suppose even Leftist environmentalists would fail to get much public traction waving placards reading, "No More Tsunamis!"

I think this may have something to do with language.  Years ago, as a physician-in-training, I was struck by a subtle but important nomenclature change.  A new medical diagnostic technique, "nuclear magnetic resonance imaging" was catching on, but General Electric insisted on dropping the first word, apparently sparing itself hordes of protesters demonstrating against dangerous rotator cuff scans.  

Maybe all nuclear power needs is a better name. Any ideas?

Comments:


Mel Foil
Joined
Jun '10
Mel Foil

guardian.co.uk: Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant operator 'ignored tsunami warning'

29 November 2011
by Justin McCurry in Tokyo

Excerpt: The operator of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant ignored warnings [previous engineering studies] that the complex was at risk of damage from a tsunami of the size that hit north-east Japan in March, and dismissed the need for better protection against seawater flooding, according to reports.

Tokyo Electric Power (Tepco) officials rejected "unrealistic" estimates made in a 2008 internal report that the plant could be threatened by a tsunami of up to 10.2 metres, Kyodo news agency said.

The tsunami that crippled backup power supplies at the plant on the afternoon of 11 March, leading to the meltdown of three reactors, was more than 14 metres high.

[...]

The accident was triggered when seawater flooded power supply lines, disabling cooling systems and triggering a meltdown in three of Fukushima Daiichi's six reactors.

The 40-year-old plant was built on the assumption that the biggest tsunami that could be expected on the Fukushima coast would be 5.7 metres high. Even at that height, the 2008 report said, water levels onsite could exceed 15 metres.

Del Mar Dave
Joined
Oct '10
Del Mar Dave

NOO-cue-lar. 

(H/T GWB)

Stu In Tokyo
Joined
May '11
Stu In Tokyo

Just to give you a little local perspective, I live less than 2 miles from that park where this protest took place, this is the first I've heard of it. The protest did NOT "bring central Tokyo to a halt" that is just simply not true.

Domo

Edited on July 17, 2012 at 2:39am
George Savage

Mel Foil

guardian.co.uk: Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant operator 'ignored tsunami warning'

29 November 2011
by Justin McCurry in Tokyo

Excerpt:The operator of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant ignored warnings [previous engineering studies] that the complex was at risk of damage from a tsunami of the size that hit north-east Japan in March, and dismissed the need for better protection against seawater flooding, according to reports.

3 minutes ago

Yet despite all the malfeasance, we are left with one crippled power plant and a highly localized radiologic hazard.  No fatalities.  None.

Edited on July 17, 2012 at 2:43am
Pilli
Joined
May '11
Pilli

Let's start calling it ProtonPower!  Power Rangers Unite!

Mel Foil
Joined
Jun '10
Mel Foil

George Savage

Mel Foil

guardian.co.uk: Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant operator 'ignored tsunami warning'

29 November 2011
by Justin McCurry in Tokyo

Excerpt:The operator of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant ignored warnings [previous engineering studies] that the complex was at risk of damage from a tsunami of the size that hit north-east Japan in March, and dismissed the need for better protection against seawater flooding, according to reports.

Yet despite all the malfeasance, we are left with one crippled power plant and a highly localized radiologic hazard.  No fatalities.  None.

I didn't make it clear, but my point was, there's usually some mechanical danger that was predicted long enough ahead of time, and could've been fixed, but laziness or stinginess intervened in the decision to fix it. It's the humans that are dangerous.

Western Chauvinist
Joined
Dec '10
Western Chauvinist

Emission-Free Fission Clean Energy.

EFFn Clean Energy for short. /couldn't resist -- please don't hurt me Editor.

raycon and lindacon
Joined
Oct '10
raycon

Perhaps utopiapower will catch on.  Sounds warm and fuzzy.

Dan Hanson
Joined
Aug '10
Dan Hanson

Here's my solution to the protests - have every protester sign a form saying that, if there are electricity shortages, he or she agrees to opt out of nuclear power.  If there's not enough power to go around from conventional sources, the protestors will be the first to have their power shut off.

Let's see how many agree to that...


Joined
Feb '11
david foster

George..."A new medical diagnostic technique, "nuclear magnetic resonance imaging" was catching on, but General Electric insisted on dropping the first word, apparently sparing itself hordes of protesters demonstrating against dangerous rotator cuff scans."

I knew that the technology had previously been called nuclear magnetic resonance, and had wondered who was the marketing genius who changed the name. Whoever it was, GE (and its competitors, and lots of patients) owes him a lot!

George Savage

Western Chauvinist: Emission-Free Fission Clean Energy.

EFFn Clean Energy for short. /couldn't resist -- please don't hurt me Editor. · 16 minutes ago

EFFn Power.  I love it!

Fredösphere
Joined
May '10
Fredösphere

Flower power. No, make that mushroom power. Or rather . . . um . . . never mind.

Mark Zdeblick
Joined
May '10
Mark Zdeblick

A transition away from "nuclear power" sounds like fun. How about:

Quantum Power

Nano Power

Proto-Power

Mao = Red Power

Greenpeace = Green Power

Nuclear = Yellow Power! (Color of Uranium)

Blue Power (color of nuclear reaction below 30' of water)

Quark Power (Quarks are cool...)

Higg's Power (no one really understands the Higgs Boson, anyway).

Boson Power (Sounds strong...)

Pluto Power (everyone likes Disney...)

Star Power (Stars are very pretty nuclear power plants...)

Fissile Power (better an accurate but unknown word.

Fire-free Power

Eco-Power

Safe Power (Much safer than Tsunami Power)

Alpha Power (Radioactive decay)

Beta Power (Another radioactive decay)

Gamma Power ( sounds radioactive, even if not part of the Uranium Series )

CoolHand
Joined
Dec '10
CoolHand

I've been saying this ever since the thing happened.

The plant did its job, above and beyond what it was designed to do.

Yes, it was destroyed, but so what?  The infrastructure was destroyed, but it contained the accident and stopped any loss of life.

Any time I encounter people who are anti-nuclear power, I always ask them what kind of power they'd prefer we'd use, and without fail they always use the word "sustainable" without every really answering the questions.  Most say something about wind and solar power, and then run away.

The stupids are in charge, and the stupids demand a magical answer to this actual real world problem.

They want us to generate ever greater amounts of power, without using any fossil fuel or nuclear reactors, even when the sun doesn't shine and the wind doesn't blow.

In other words, the stupids demand that we mere mortals produce for them an endless chain of  miracles, and be quick about it.

When reality finally hits them in the face, it will hurt quite a lot more than it needs to, and for that I am grateful.

John Walker
Joined
Oct '10
John Walker
George Savage: Maybe all nuclear power needs is a better name. Any ideas?

In the 1970s, while I was living in Marin County, California (got better!), the Department of Defense decided to close Hamilton Air Force Base and make it available for other uses.  This set off the kind of festival of airhead proposals you'd imagine for mid '70s Marin.  I suggested that the facility be used to construct a fast breeder reactor and plutonium reprocessing plant, providing closed-cycle clean energy for the Bay Area.

My name for the facility?  “Marin Renewable Energy Park”

Wylee Coyote
Joined
Jul '10
Wylee Coyote

"Ethical Energy".

Stu In Tokyo
Joined
May '11
Stu In Tokyo

The Tokyo area, has about 12,000,000 people, the greater Kanto Plain  has 39,000,000 people, and I will bet you that protesters came from all over the country, not just the Kanto area, even if we use their number of 170,000 people protesting, that is about 1.4% of the 12 million, or only 0.4% of the greater Kanto plain. Not exactly a lot of people, and this was held on a national holiday, where most people had the day off, yet they can only get 1% or less to come out? It is hot and humid here right now, as usual, if we start getting brown outs and people cannot use their air con, then let me tell you the anti-nuke nuts will certainly kill a lot of people from the heat.

David Williamson
Joined
Mar '11
David Williamson

As with many things, Japan shows the US the way - sadly, not with Thorium power, but with solar panels and turning off the power.

I will be there in a coupla weeks, and look forward to climbing up switched-off escalators and sweltering in offices with switched-off A/C at lunchtime... not.

Stu In Tokyo
Joined
May '11
Stu In Tokyo

The solar panel thing is a farce, we have a HUGE one on top of our building, it will NEVER pay for itself, its a joke.


Joined
Feb '11
david foster

Countries that are foreswearing nuclear power do represent a great export opportunity for US natural gas, transported of course in LNG vessels.

Maybe even Israeli natural gas, if current reports turn out to be correct.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In