Yesterday, in a joint operation conducted by the Shin Bet and the Israeli Air Force, Israel killed 27-year-old terrorist Mohammed Namnam, identified by the Jerusalem Post as "a top operative with the Army of Islam, a radical Palestinian terror group affiliated with al-Qaida and involved in the 2006 abduction of Gilad Shalit." IDF spokeswoman Lt.-Col. Avital Leibovitz called Namnam, who had been an active terrorist for years, a "ticking bomb": intelligence indicated that he was preparing assaults on American and Israeli targets in the Sinai.

ticking bomb assassination

Two elements of this assassination are intriguing. One is the suggestion of consultation between Israel and the Americans about it ahead of time. The IDF spokeswoman, asked directly about this, said rather coyly that "[w]ithout getting specifically into more details, I can tell you there is very good cooperation between us and the Americans." There's also some interesting subtext to Hamas's unhesitating -- and as yet uncomplaining -- identification of the dead man: he was a senior aide to Mumtaz Dughmush, commander of the Army of Islam and top dog of the Dughmush clan, which has been fighting an undeclared war with Hamas pretty much non-stop since Hamas seized power in the Strip. The Dughmush clan is al-Qaida's local branch in Gaza and as such is a rival to Hamas. They kidnapped BBC correspondent Alan Johnston in 2007 as well as many other foreign nationals, and they regularly attack Palestinian targets, including Christians. They take no notice of Hamas directives regarding the timing and constitution of violent confrontation with Israel and act on their own initiative, come what may. The enmity between them has led to ample intra-Palestinian bloodletting.

(The Dughmush connection could very well explain, by the way, why Gilad Shalit is still locked in a cellar in Gaza, four years after his abduction, without the slightest movement forward towards his release: if Hamas isn't holding him, they can't free him. And the conditions of Shalit's captivity are so far beyond the pale -- not so much as a single Red Cross visit to confirm he's in one piece or even a letter from his own mother to comfort him in four years -- as to suggest that it is indeed the al-Qaida freakshow that unfortunately is holding him and not the relatively more mainstream Hamas freakshow, which has in fact battled the Dughmush clan in the past specifically to get them to release kidnap victims.)

I expect we'll hear less of the usual "Israel, with her insatiable lust for blood, has slaughtered another innocent Palestinian civilian" this time around (at least from within Gaza; we'll surely get it from the usual suspects in Europe). We will never know who Namnam's next target was to have been -- Israelis, Americans, or Europeans; Jews, Christians or Muslims. We can all breathe a little easier today, at least for the moment. And to Khaled Mashaal, leader of Hamas, on behalf of the IDF: You're welcome.

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

River
Joined
Aug '10
River

Congratulations to the IDF. Well done. How else can one fight an individual or group that hides within civilian populations? And how can those populations claim innocence if they knowingly hide such individuals?

Kennedy Smith
Joined
May '10
Kennedy Smith

Assassinations, unlike tax cuts, are always best targeted.

Charles Mark
Joined
Aug '10
Charles Mark

If it's all about proportionality, then this is well within any threshold. The idea of Hamas as the relative moderate in the situation is disconcerting, to say the least.

John Marzan
Joined
Oct '10
John Marzan

if the US can use drone attacks inside pakistan and target Awlaki in yemen, then i guess it's okay.

Dave Roy
Joined
Oct '10
David Roy

I have no problem with this whatsoever. If you can't wage war to wipe out the force that's attacking you, the only thing you can do is decapitate its leadership (so to speak).

Good Berean
Joined
Oct '10
Good Berean

I recall a recent post by a contributor mentioning the increased use of CIA "hunter-killer" groups. Not a bad idea.

ParisParamus
Joined
May '10
ParisParamus

Bravo. And Shabbat shalom.

Byron Horatio
Joined
Jul '10
Byron Horatio

To modify what George Carlin once said, "Democracies are always either at war, preparing for war, or recovering from war." And this is necessarily so. I cannot think of a free civilization in history that has not had to at frequent times thin the heard of its innumerable opponents. Every assassination of torturers, criminals, and genocidal loons is a victory for decency and human freedom.

Charlie Dameron
Joined
Jul '10
Charlie Dameron

I agree that this Namnam character was someone who needed to be dealt with. But was it really necessary to do it with a car bomb? The Shin Bet's use of the same kind of operational tactics as the terrorists doesn't inspire confidence. Israel has tremendous military and covert capabilities, and it could surely act in a more tactically responsible way than this. Setting off a car bomb to kill a single person comes with a high chance of collateral damage. Four Palestinians were injured in this blast. Those are four Palestinians (+their families) who are now that much less willing to support a peace deal, and that much more willing to harbor terrorists.

What happened to poisoning someone's food? That's a time-honored tactic, with much less potential blowback.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In