The American Episcopalian Church held its General Convention in Indianapolis this week, and it was apparently quite a show. Back in 1970, when the population of this country was considerably smaller, there were three million Episcopalians in our midst. Today, there are only one million. But one thousand of them gathered this year for the debates that took place in its House of Deputies and its House of Bishops.

In the evenings, Jay Akasie reports, they behaved in accord with the stereotype:

General Convention is also notable for its sheer ostentation and carnival atmosphere. For seven straight nights, lavish cocktail parties spilled into pricey steakhouses, where bishops could use their diocesan funds to order bottles of the finest wines.

During the day, he adds, the legislators in the two chambers gathered to discuss

such weighty topics as whether to develop funeral rites for dogs and cats, and whether to ratify resolutions condemning genetically modified foods. Both were approved by a vote, along with a resolution to "dismantle the effects of the doctrine of discovery," in effect an apology to Native Americans for exposing them to Christianity.

I wish that I were making this up, but I am not doing so -- and it looks as if things are going to get worse, for the Episcopalians are on the verge of formalizing what Akasie calls "the reality that many Episcopalians already know: a church in the grip of executive committees under the direct supervision of the church's secretive and authoritarian presiding bishop, Katharine Jefferts Shori, [which] now set the agenda and decide well in advance what kind of legislation comes before the two houses." I am not myself a republican in ecclesiastical affairs, but it looks as if what Lenin once called "democratic centralism" is going to become the order of the day.

A number of dioceses have withdrawn and are being sued so that Bishop Shori can take control of their assets. The entire delegation from the diocese of South Carolina walked out of the General Convention on Wednesday, which suggests that the South Carolinians will also soon withdraw.

What comes next? Is the Episcopalian church still a Christian church? If so, will it be one in ten years? Can it be saved from itself? Or is it too far gone to be saved?

I have long thought that the Catholic church should establish an Anglican rite. With a tweak or two, the Book of Common Prayer would work rather well. And the music, oh my God, the music? In my days at Oxford -- as a student and, much later, as a visiting fellow at All Souls -- I frequently attended evensong, and nearly always I found it moving.

Comments:


Mothership_Greg
Joined
Nov '11
Mothership_Greg

Some of these resolutions from the convention seem to be aiming at self-parody.  For example, here is one language from one titled "Advocate for a Just Global Economy for International Trade":

Resolved, That the Episcopal Church urges governments to evaluate and adopt trade policies that prioritize the following principles:

(a) That every human being's right to the basic necessities of life, as well as a right to work, to receive just wages and benefits, to experience decent and just working conditions, and to organize and join labor associations;

(b) That safeguards or improvements should be sought regarding food security, health care, maternal and child health, humane working conditions, human rights, with particular attention to the right of Indigenous peoples; and prevention of environmental degradations.

I assume my inability to take any of this pap seriously is indicative of my primitive Republican brain, and my suppressed desire to enslave aboriginal children, or some such.


Joined
Mar '12
Donald Todd

Umbra wrote: An apostate to the Baptist church; not to the Christian faith writ large. No one, presumably not even the Baptists, doubts her devotion to Christ. 

If the Baptists thought this lady's devotion to Christ was beyond doubt, why did they drive her out?  I'll help you out here.  This lady's devotion to Christ did not fit in the Baptist recognition of devotion to Christ.  To them, she was apostate.  Her sincerity did not undo her change in belief, and to Baptists, Pentecostalism is a change in belief.

Just as you are insisting on your definition of "apostacy," those Baptists were insisting on their definition of what is orthodox and what is not orthodox.  From their point of view, that lady was sent packing because she no longer believed what Baptists believe (Baptist orthodoxy), making her apostate (unorthodox).

If you are insistent, you might visit the Baptist Church headquarters in this country.  Work out an arrangement whereby Baptists who find themselves experiencing charismata, including speaking in tongues, can stay in their congregations without regard to the beliefs of those congregations.  The congregations can move to belief light in order to avoid dogmatic confrontations.  Suit you?

Mothership_Greg
Joined
Nov '11
Mothership_Greg

Also of note is a resolution endorsing R2P, another calling to end the embargo against Cuba, and another titled "Resolution on Wealth" (which pretty much says what you expect it to say, e.g., OWS platitudes).  But remember, it's those darned Catholic bishops always inserting themselves in politics!

Goldgeller
Joined
Aug '11
Goldgeller

I think you have to be careful before saying someone or a denomination isn't a Christian. I agree with Umbra Fractus that short of denying a very major tenant of the faith-- like divinity of Christ or the bodily resurrection, we shouldn't who is Christian and who isn't. But that doesn't mean that we can't critical of some aspects of any denominations..

Rocket City Dave
Joined
Jul '12
Rocket City Dave

Pseudodionysius:Now I'd not commune with them or expect clear gospel from them but they've not equivocated on the trinity or the Gospel have they?

I don't know if you've had the pleasure of attending an Anglo-Catholic women's conference where the plenary speaker leads a prayer to "God, our mother" and praises "Christa" -- the "female" Christ.

At that point, I was looking for a Wiccan to enter the room and add some sobriety to the proceedings before the discussion turned to using environmentally friendly light bulbs during Lent as a fasting exercise, presumably because when God said "Let there be light" in the book of Genesis, He noticed that the first two letters of the word Genesis were the initials for General Electric. · 15 hours ago

Now that seems similar to an experience I had when I accidentally entered an Evangelical Lutheran Church in America service. When the liturgy finds space for a statement in favor of diversity and against intolerance (racial, gender, sexual, handicapible, or ethnic) and can't find room for either Creed or a mention of Christ, I'm ready to call the Church's Christianity into question.

Edited on July 14, 2012 at 9:56pm
Joseph Stanko
Joined
Jun '10
Joseph Stanko

Fat Dave

It only establishes a personal prelature, which the Vatican admits it will gradually Romanize until the Anglican converts are absorbed into the Roman Rite.

Where have you read this, who in the Vatican has said the intention is to gradually Romanize the converts?  Everything I've read has said the personal prelature will establish permanent parishes with their own distinctive Anglican liturgy and traditions.

Anglicanorum Coetibus says:

III. Without excluding liturgical celebrations according to the Roman Rite, the Ordinariate has the faculty to celebrate the Holy Eucharist and the other Sacraments, the Liturgy of the Hours and other liturgical celebrations according to the liturgical books proper to the Anglican tradition, which have been approved by the Holy See, so as to maintain the liturgical, spiritual and pastoral traditions of the Anglican Communion within the Catholic Church, as a precious gift nourishing the faith of the members of the Ordinariate and as a treasure to be shared.

Peter Robinson

"I have long thought that the Catholic church should establish an Anglican rite. With a tweak or two, the Book of Common Prayer would work rather well. And the music, oh my God, the music? In my days at Oxford -- as a student and, much later, as a visiting fellow at All Souls -- I frequently attended evensong, and nearly always I found it moving."

I agree with every anguished word, even down to having attended evensong as often as I could at Christ Church.  In re which, two comments:

1.  One of my friends at Christ Church, Oxford, then studying to become a priest in the American Episcopal church--ordained in England, he had to have a special exemption from taking an oath of loyalty to the Queeen--was Jeff Steenson.  Jeff Steenson's current role in our religious controversies?  See for yourself.

2.  You being you, Paul, you may already have discovered this, but each week the BBC still broadcasts choral evensong.

Joseph Stanko
Joined
Jun '10
Joseph Stanko

Peter Robinson: 

1.  One of my friends at Christ Church, Oxford, then studying to become a priest in the American Episcopal church--ordained in England, he had to have a special exemption from taking an oath of loyalty to the Queeen--was Jeff Steenson.  Jeff Steenson's current role in our religious controversies?  See for yourself.

He and his wife Debra were received into the Catholic Church in 2007, after 28 years of ministry in the Church of England and the Episcopal Church. Fr. Steenson was ordained for the Catholic priesthood in the Archdiocese of Santa Fe in 2009...

According to the CDF:

The forthcoming Apostolic Constitution... provides for the ordination as Catholic priests of married former Anglican clergy. Historical and ecumenical reasons preclude the ordination of married men as bishops in both the Catholic and Orthodox Churches. The Constitution therefore stipulates that the Ordinary can be either a priest or an unmarried bishop. 

Rites are led by a patriarch or a major archbishop.  If Pope Benedict had created an Anglican Rite, Fr. Steenson would have had to be ordained a bishop to lead it, and being married would render him ineligible.  A Personal Ordinariate sidesteps this issue.

Joseph Stanko
Joined
Jun '10
Joseph Stanko

From the Ordinariate's FAQ:

Will the liturgy look like a typical Catholic liturgy?

The liturgy in ordinariate parishes will be fully Catholic, though will feel very similar to that of a traditional Anglican liturgy in terms of music, structure and prayers. Parishes will use theBook of Divine Worship, which is a Vatican-approved Catholic liturgical book that is based upon historic Anglican liturgies, with the prayers adapted to fully reflect Catholic belief. Both the Book of Divine Worship and the Roman Missal will be authorized for use.

Paul A. Rahe

Peter Robinson:

2.  You being you, Paul, you may already have discovered this, but each week the BBC still broadcasts choral evensong. · 36 minutes ago

News to me most welcome.

Peter Robinson

Joseph Stanko: From the Ordinariate's FAQ:

Will the liturgy look like a typical Catholic liturgy?

Parishes will use theBook of Divine Worship, which is a Vatican-approved Catholic liturgical book that is based upon historic Anglican liturgies, with the prayers adapted to fully reflect Catholic belief. Both the Book of Divine Worship and the Roman Missal will be authorized for use.

3 hours ago

One question I don't see answered in the Ordinariate's FAQ:  Who's permitted to attend an "Anglican use" mass?  Would it be wrong, if only indecorous, for a Catholic who has simply had it up to here with the sheer unrelenting vapidity of the contemporary American liturgy and music--who is sick of guitars and lectors who seem to believe they're leading hootenannies and of hymns composed during the Seventies that have failed to improve with time--would it be an error for such Catholics to seek refuge in an "Anglican use" parish?

Because if it isn't, Paul Rahe and I may try to find our way to such parishes as early as tomorrow morning.

Joseph Stanko
Joined
Jun '10
Joseph Stanko

Peter Robinson

One question I don't see answered in the Ordinariate's FAQ:  Who's permitted to attend an "Anglican use" mass?

Because if it isn't, Paul Rahe and I may try to find our way to such parishes as early as tomorrow morning. 

Can lifelong Catholics join the ordinariate?

The ordinariate was formed in response to repeated and persistent inquiries from Anglican groups who were seeking to become Catholic. The ordinariate provides a way for these groups to enter in "corporate reunion"; that is, as a group and not simply as individuals. This will allow them to retain their Anglican liturgical heritage and traditions while being fully Catholic.

While lifelong Catholics are welcome to attend Masses in an ordinariate parish, they would be members of a regular diocese.

I read that to mean you'd be welcome to attend Mass there from time to time, but you'd be expected to remain a member of your local Roman Rite parish.

In any case if you wish to attend an Anglican Use Mass tomorrow, you'd better book a flight proto, as they don't seem to have any communities here in California as yet.

Peter Robinson

Joseph Stanko

Peter Robinson

One question I don't see answered in the Ordinariate's FAQ:  Who's permitted to attend an "Anglican use" mass?

Because if it isn't, Paul Rahe and I may try to find our way to such parishes as early as tomorrow morning.

While lifelong Catholics are welcome to attend Masses in an ordinariate parish, they would be members of a regular diocese.

I read that to mean you'd be welcome to attend Mass there from time to time, but you'd be expected to remain a member of your local Roman Rite parish.

In any case if you wish to attend an Anglican Use Mass tomorrow, you'd better book a flight proto, as they don't seem to have any communities here in California as yet. · 45 minutes ago

Thanks, Joseph.  But drat.

Pseudodionysius
Joined
Sep '10
Pseudodionysius

Peter is just fighting his attraction to a California FSSP parish and is too shy to say so.

Joseph Stanko
Joined
Jun '10
Joseph Stanko
Pseudodionysius: Peter is just fighting his attraction to a California FSSP parish and is too shy to say so. · 1 minute ago

Closer, but Sacramento and Fresno are still a long drive from Palo Alto.

But Peter needn't leave the Bay Area, there's a sung Latin (ordinary form) Mass every Sunday at St. Patrick's in downtown San Francisco, and St. Margaret Mary's in Oakland has two in Latin, one ordinary and one extraordinary form.  It's affiliated with the Institute of Christ the King.

I attended one of their Corpus Christi processions this year, complete with an Oakland Police escort around the block.  It was lovely.

Marythefifth
Joined
Mar '11
Marythefifth

Just to rub it in, our choir's repertoire includes de Victoria's Mass, Ave Verum Corpus, O Magnum Mysterium; Alegri's Miserere every Ash Wednesday; Lotti's Miserere, his Crucifixus on Good Friday; Desprez Ave Maria; lots of stuff by Palestrina, including a mass, and several Mozart masses; Thomas Tallis' O Nata Lux, If Ye Love Me. Brahms is fun because he sends the altos high in their range. The congregation sings the Missa Marialis every Sunday, with different masses in Lent and Advent. Most of the hymns we sing are pretty fine  with gorgeous harmony arrangements, although both the 1940 and more so the 1972 hymnal included lots of yawners.

I feel so blessed by this music. 

What is the reason Roman churches either aren't allowed or able to assemble choirs to sing such treasures? I've long wondered, but never asked.

Fat Dave
Joined
Mar '11
Fat Dave

Joseph Stanko

Fat Dave

It only establishes a personal prelature, which the Vatican admits it will gradually Romanize until the Anglican converts are absorbed into the Roman Rite.

Where have you read this, who in the Vatican has said the intention is to gradually Romanize the converts?  Everything I've read has said the personal prelature will establish permanent parishes with their own distinctive Anglican liturgy and traditions.

Jul 14 at 2:12pm

The problem is that it doesn't allow for the education of future Anglican  priests.  To maintain the parishes past the first generation, under the current rubrics, will require the conversion of more priests from the Anglican Communion.  P.S.  I heard this from a friend, an Episcopalian who studied theology under the Dominicans and was ordained an Anglican-Catholic priest and was part of the team who was negotiating with the CDF.  You'll get some hardcores converting, but I still haven't seen Anglicans flocking to the Catholic Church.  There are a lot of cultural issues, I know, but the Vatican really blew an opportunity with this.


Joined
Aug '12
Richard Fonte

Although usually at first difficult for most liturgically oriented Protestants to consider , eastern orthodoxy, is closest to theological position than roman catholicMusic wise, however, there is no organ used, just a choir


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In