If the polling is accurate on two game changing ballot initiatives, my guess is--yes!

gay-weed

Forget Vegas! Seattle is about to become the city to be in if you want to marry your same-sex partner and pass the dutchie at the wedding reception.

What say you, Ricochetti? Libertarian Paradise, New Sodom and Gomorrah or something else?

Comments:


The King Prawn
Joined
Dec '10
The King Prawn

Seattle is on it's way to out-hippie/liberal/queer San Francisco. I foresee a dramatic rise in interest for splitting the state on November 7th.

Mr. Bildo
Joined
May '11
Mr. Bildo
The King Prawn: Seattle is on it's way to out-hippie/liberal/queer San Francisco. I foresee a dramatic rise in interest for splitting the state on November 7th. 

Haha. You were the first person I thought of when I posted this. 

Run for the hills!

The King Prawn
Joined
Dec '10
The King Prawn

As to the original question, I don't think the libertarian (or liberal, really) paradise will come of this. The libertarian utopia is based on the belief that enough people will act wisely with their liberty to not create chaos. That only works if something else is in place to check the baser nature of humanity. Historically faith, family, and community have acted as that check. Liberals, stupidly, have done everything possible to destroy those checks. Sans the historical throttles and the state's heavy hand the place will go to hell quickly.

1967mustangman
Joined
Apr '11
1967mustangman

Mr. Bildo

The King Prawn: Seattle is on it's way to out-hippie/liberal/queer San Francisco. I foresee a dramatic rise in interest for splitting the state on November 7th. 

Haha. You were the first person I thought of when I posted this. 

Run for the hills! · 8 minutes ago

You essentially beat me too it but I was going to say you Washingtonians were about to out weird Portland.

J. D. Fitzpatrick
Joined
Oct '10
J. D. Fitzpatrick
What say you, Ricochetti, Libertarian Paradise, New Sodom and Gomorrah or something else? · · 20 minutes ago

BLT: Boring Little Town (from one who grew up there)

The King Prawn
Joined
Dec '10
The King Prawn

J. D. Fitzpatrick

What say you, Ricochetti, Libertarian Paradise, New Sodom and Gomorrah or something else? · · 20 minutes ago

BLT: Boring Little Town (from one who grew up there) · 2 minutes ago

My dad was stationed at Whidbey in the '60s and told me before I came up here that Seattle was the world's largest farm town.

J. D. Fitzpatrick
Joined
Oct '10
J. D. Fitzpatrick

The King Prawn

J. D. Fitzpatrick

What say you, Ricochetti, Libertarian Paradise, New Sodom and Gomorrah or something else? · · 20 minutes ago

BLT: Boring Little Town (from one who grew up there) · 2 minutes ago

My dad was stationed at Whidbey in the '60s and told me before I came up here that Seattle was the world's largest farm town. · 7 minutes ago

When I was growing up there, I thought, "Isn't it wonderful that Seattle is so green!" And then, after living in Chicago, Berlin, and London, I realized that gray is for cities, green is for, well, farms. 

Fred Cole
Joined
Nov '11
Fred Cole
The King Prawn: As to the original question, I don't think the libertarian (or liberal, really) paradise will come of this. The libertarian utopia is based on the belief that enough people will act wisely with their liberty to not create chaos. That only works if something else is in place to check the baser nature of humanity. Historically faith, family, and community have acted as that check. Liberals, stupidly, have done everything possible to destroy those checks. Sans the historical throttles and the state's heavy hand the place will go to hell quickly. · 10 minutes ago

The real check on it is existence.  The reason you can't get stoned all day long and lay around contemplating why they call them fingers and yet they don't fing, is that you'll starve to death.

If someone is going to give you free food, free rent, free rubbers, and free heat, that pressure to aid in the perpetuation of your own life goes away.

Edited on October 18, 2012 at 9:11pm
Fred Cole
Joined
Nov '11
Fred Cole

And I thought everybody already knew about Seattle.  

Washington and Oregon both let you posses over 24 oz. of usable marijuana and over a dozen plants (for medicinal purposes).

For those of you who don't know, 24 oz. is A LOT of marijuana.

1967mustangman
Joined
Apr '11
1967mustangman

Fred Cole: And I thought everybody already knew about Seattle.  

Washington and Oregon both let you posses over 24 oz. of usable marijuana and over a dozen plants (for medicinal purposes).

For those of you who don't know, 24 oz. is A LOT of marijuana. · 9 minutes ago

Not sure we are quite so libertine.  As I recall (having no personal knowledge) you can posses up to once ounce and only get a fine (unless you have a medical marijuana card)  over an ounce is a felony.  

kesbar
Joined
Apr '11
kesbar

I'm not sure if this will increase or decrease property values.  We shall see...

Fred Cole
Joined
Nov '11
Fred Cole

1967mustangman

Fred Cole: And I thought everybody already knew about Seattle.  

Washington and Oregon both let you posses over 24 oz. of usable marijuana and over a dozen plants (for medicinal purposes).

For those of you who don't know, 24 oz. is A LOT of marijuana. · 9 minutes ago

Not sure we are quite so libertine.  As I recall (having no personal knowledge) you can posses up to once ounce and only get a fine (unless you have a medical marijuana card)  over an ounce is a felony.   · 5 minutes ago

Well, to be clear, I was talking about medical marijuana.

And when it comes to medical, yeah its that free:

How much medical marijuana (cannabis) can I have?

A qualifying patient or designated provider may have a 60-day supply of medical marijuana. A 60-day supply is defined as 24 ounces and 15 plants under RCW 69.51A.040. The law says that a patient may exceed these limits if he or she can prove medical need. However, the law only allows for an affirmative defense (and not protection from arrest or prosecution) if the limit is exceeded and the patient is complying with the law.

Schrodinger's Cat
Joined
Mar '12
Schrodinger's Cat

Does Seattle have any casinos? If not, Vegas has nothing to worry about.

Marry in Seattle. Honeymoon in Vegas!

Fred Cole
Joined
Nov '11
Fred Cole
kesbar: I'm not sure if this will increase or decrease property values.  We shall see... · 1 minute ago

In Los Angeles, before the city cracked down, dispensaries were a boon to their local areas.

Which is worse for crime and property values?

A business with lights and security cameras or an empty store front?

The King Prawn
Joined
Dec '10
The King Prawn

Fred Cole

 

The real check on it is existence.  The reason you can't get stoned all day long and lay around contemplating why they call them fingers and yet they don't fing, is that you'll starve to death.

If someone is going to give you free food, free rent, free rubbers, and free heat, that pressure to aid in the perpetuation of your own life goes away. · 32 minutes ago

Well, duh. We must dismantle the welfare state before we can return to a more natural state of liberty. But, even sans the welfare state, the externally enforced controls (faith, family, society) on internal compulsions must still be in place or we end up in a Hobbesian war of all against all.

Ryan M
Joined
May '11
Ryan M
The King Prawn: As to the original question, I don't think the libertarian (or liberal, really) paradise will come of this. The libertarian utopia is based on the belief that enough people will act wisely with their liberty to not create chaos. That only works if something else is in place to check the baser nature of humanity. Historically faith, family, and community have acted as that check. Liberals, stupidly, have done everything possible to destroy those checks. Sans the historical throttles and the state's heavy hand the place will go to hell quickly. · 1 hour ago

Good insight, Prawn.  I've made a similar point in arguing w/ ricochet libertarians about how we need to dismantle the welfare state before doing things like legalizing pot.  I'm not saying it is even bad, just that if things aren't done in order, we do far more harm than good.

My wife and I voted yesterday (mail in ballots - another reason the last debate won't matter) against both of these.  I just barely live East of the mountains, and sometimes I am really happy that I do.

Ryan M
Joined
May '11
Ryan M

The King Prawn

Well, duh. We must dismantle the welfare state beforewe can return to a more natural state of liberty. But, even sans the welfare state, the externally enforced controls (faith, family, society) on internal compulsions must still be in place or we end up in a Hobbesian war of all against all. · 8 minutes ago

HAHA - I am terribly sorry for using the phrase "dismantle the welfare state" before reading this comment.  That's what I get, I guess.  So... maybe I should just edit that to "I concur."

Mendel
Joined
Mar '11
Mendel
Mr. Bildo: If the polling is accurate on two game changing ballot initiatives, my guess is--yes!

If they do pass, your other hypothesis will also be tested - namely, whether these two issues are truly game changers.  My guess is no.

Pot is already widely consumed in all jurisdictions, and homosexuals are a tiny minority of the population who often already have many all the priviliges of marriage.  Legalizing both will be symbolically novel, but I predict the practical effects will be barely noticeable.

And any federalism-loving, non-Washingtonian Ricochet member should be hoping that both of these measures pass in order to gain a data point on their effects for future debates. 50 laboratories and all that.

Edited on October 18, 2012 at 9:57pm
The King Prawn
Joined
Dec '10
The King Prawn

Ryan M

 

My wife and I voted yesterday (mail in ballots - another reason the last debate won't matter) against both of these. 

Kitsap mailed out ballots yesterday, so I'm giddy to get home from work today. I am such a dork.

Mendel
Joined
Mar '11
Mendel

The King Prawn

Fred Cole

 

If someone is going to give you free food, free rent, free rubbers, and free heat, that pressure to aid in the perpetuation of your own life goes away. · 32 minutes ago

Well, duh. We must dismantle the welfare statebeforewe can return to a more natural state of liberty. But, even sans the welfare state, the externally enforced controls (faith, family, society) on internal compulsions must still be in place or we end up in a Hobbesian war of all against all.

We seem to have this exact discussion about "how far can you legalize "deviant" behavior without eliminating welfare?" in every one of these libertarian vs social conservative threads.  Maybe it's time for a thread to duke the issue out once and for all?


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In