I guess we could have that debate about Andrew Sullivan now ...
Claire Berlinski ·
Jun 27, 2010 at 4:46am
Is anyone awake? Anyone?
- Comment (15)
- · Quote
- · UnfollowFollow (2)
| © 2012 Silent Cal Productions | Help • About • Contact • FAQ • Code of Conduct • Terms & Conditions • Privacy • Store • Site Map • DMCA |
Comments :
Re: I guess we could have that debate about Andrew Sullivan now ...
Okay, listen, I'm here ALL THE TIME, Ms. Haig. But, if you mean "awake" as in able to write complete sentences about thoughtful subjects -- or thoughtful sentences about complete subjects -- I'm not that ladyfriend. I could, however, field suggestions on what to do with my kids for the next 12 hours when there are at least that many hours of chores to be done.
Re: I guess we could have that debate about Andrew Sullivan now ...
Well, we could see what they think about Andrew Sullivan, couldn't we?
May '10
Re: I guess we could have that debate about Andrew Sullivan now ...
I"m only awake because my two analog alarm clocks insisted on turkey and giblets before 7:00 a.m. Even if I gulped another cup of coffee, I don't think I'd be up to discussing Andrew Sullivan. Ricochet should be flattered. I checked it before looking at the Sunday circular for Target.
Re: I guess we could have that debate about Andrew Sullivan now ...
Clara, the eldest: "Sully? Like from Monsters, Inc.?" (He's the good monster, if that helps the conversation.)
Re: I guess we could have that debate about Andrew Sullivan now ...
My cat Daisy: "I don't like beagles."
Re: I guess we could have that debate about Andrew Sullivan now ...
Magdalena likes Bugles.
Re: I guess we could have that debate about Andrew Sullivan now ...
Daisy likes bugs!
This is what happens when chicks take over the political debate.
Re: I guess we could have that debate about Andrew Sullivan now ...
"Bus" is Paddy's favorite word. Swear.
Re: I guess we could have that debate about Andrew Sullivan now ...
Plus, I take full responsibility for the mindlessness of this comment thread. No one would doubt that you, dear Claire, are up for a feisty and intellectual debate on all topics at all hours. Me? Not so much.....
Re: I guess we could have that debate about Andrew Sullivan now ...
We're honored!
Re Andrew Sullivan: This isn't going to be about "epistemic closure," is it?
Re: I guess we could have that debate about Andrew Sullivan now ...
Who is The Logo, anyway?
Re: I guess we could have that debate about Andrew Sullivan now ...
"I thought Oz was a great Head," said Dorothy.
"And I thought Oz was a lovely Lady," said the Scarecrow.
"And I thought Oz was a terrible Beast," said the Tin Woodman.
"And I thought Oz was a Ball of Fire," exclaimed the Lion.
"No, you are all wrong, " said the little man, meekly. "I have been making believe."
Re: I guess we could have that debate about Andrew Sullivan now ...
Well, I'm not related (in my long form) to the "Restricted" notice, as the MPAA's trademark attorneys suggested a couple of months ago. I don't see the resemblance.
Jun '10
Re: I guess we could have that debate about Andrew Sullivan now ...
What Andrew Sullivan misunderstands is, "the Great American Experiment" was, and is, for the benefit of the "ordinary man" (and woman) as well. It's not just a plaything for "intellectuals" like Barack, and himself. The ordinary man--who might appreciate the things that Gov. Sarah Palin brings to the table, like blue-collar commonsense, or a passion for liberty--is just as much an expert on what America ought to be as Andrew is. What exactly does Andrew bring to the table again, aside from his obstetrics expertise? I forget.
Re: I guess we could have that debate about Andrew Sullivan now ...
So this is what happens around here when I'm sleeping in on a Sunday morning. Interesting.