Before 9/11, flying wasn’t great, with the airlines’ drift towards being flying bus lines, but it was awfully convenient. Now, it’s not, not just because of the TSA follies.

Courtesy of Small Dead Animals, I read this Globe & Mail column stating that 1,000 miles is about the author‘s minimum distance beyond which flying becomes more attractive than driving. It occurred to me that that’s about the distance I’d mentally adopted. I’m willing to drive from the Upper Midwest to, say, Washington, D.C. I've got to fly to New Mexico for a weekend, but if it were a longer trip, I might consider driving. And, all things being equal, I like flying.

Now, all of this is lunatic, in a way, given the vastly greater time (and danger) of road travel compared to air travel, but the sheer unpleasantness, slowness, and relative unreliability of flying seems to be pushing a lot of people away.

How about you? Any mile marker at which the calculus changes? And has it moved one way or the other in recent years?

Comments:


TeamAmerica
Joined
Oct '10
TeamAmerica

I live in NJ and I have family in Florida which is almost exactly 1,000 miles away. Even before 9/11 I liked driving because I needn't rent a car and I could bring what I wanted. Now, with the TSA, as well as the luggage surcharges, I'd probably drive if it were say 1,200 miles.

Claire Berlinski, Ed.

My recent trip was so unpleasant--mostly the outbound flight, the flight back was okay--that I would seriously consider snorkeling next time. Time and money, not risk, is the boundary on my decision-making. It's so much cheaper and so much faster to fly cross-country that I can't really imagine driving (it would count as a "vacation," not a "rational business decision). But I'd accept driving-levels of risk to have flying be as comfortable as driving. At least, I think I would: Maybe I'd feel differently if I started seeing regular headlines about planes dropping out of the sky. 

Foxman
Joined
Dec '10
Foxman

 It depends on how long I'd be away.  For a weekend  300 miles would be about it.  For a week, maybe 1000.  If I were retired and did not have to be anywhere:  anywhere in the 48.

Cas Balicki
Joined
Jun '10
Cas Balicki

Not a fair question, I love to drive. I'm sure I would love to fly if I actually flew the plane, but since I don't, I don't love to fly. In short I'm up for a road trip anytime and usually any where.

Beasley
Joined
Dec '10
Beasley

I drive about 1000mi between Colorado and Idaho a few times a year, and I have no complaints. My limit, is usually whatever I could drive in a day, so under 16hrs. ID to CO is about 13hr. Flights to more rural airports (like Boise) are still pretty expensive, so I tend to save money, even if I'm driving alone. The only thing that detours me, and only seasonally, are the snow drifts on Wyoming roads. 

Beasley
Joined
Dec '10
Beasley

double post

Edited on August 3, 2011 at 9:15am
Israel P.
Joined
Feb '11
Israel P.

 It also depends on whether you are travelling alone.

grotiushug
Joined
Jul '11
grotiushug
Foxman:  It depends on how long I'd be away.  For a weekend  300 miles would be about it.  For a week, maybe 1000.  If I were retired and did not have to be anywhere:  anywhere in the 48. · Aug 2 at 11:48pm

Same here; I hate to fly.  One thing I'd like to mention, though, is that flying in and out of a small-town is a lot more pleasant than it is to do the same from metropolitan areas.  I fly fairly often between LaGuardia and Billings (change in Minneapolis), and let me tell you the experience is a lot more pleasant on the Montana end.  Not just because the scale is more human but because the people who work there are polite and efficient.  In New York I think all TSA employees need to pass the "how to behave as if you have a chip on your shoulder" class in order to be certified.  

J. C. Casteel
Joined
Nov '10
J. C. Casteel

76 m.p.h. x 14 hours = 1,064 miles.

After my last flight I decided dying alone in a hurtling box I'm steering is preferable to dying in a hurtling box full of strangers piloted by others.  And the freedom to whip into a quick shop at will for a microwave burrito is enough to assuage my fear of a head-on with a tweeting cheerleader.


Joined
Aug '10
nordman

I used to fly a lot. I even remember a time when it was fun.   Now, I only fly commercial to Alaska, Hawaii, and Europe.  Everything else has become a road  trip.  In other words, I fly only if I have no other option.

Road trips can be quite enjoyable  when strategically timed to miss metropolitan rush hours when passing through a city.     But I must admit the the old jingle  updated for the  times,   'See the USA in your Government Motors Bailout Vehicle'   does not work for me.   But I don't have a Chevy and expect I never will,  so its a moot point,  I suppose.  

Fortunately,   Online Web conferencing has reduced the need for business travel considerably.  

anon_academic
Joined
Aug '10
anon_academic

In Los Angeles for carmageddon people raced from Burbank to Long Beach (about 45 miles) on a bicycle versus an airplane. The bicycle won on door-to-door time, largely thanks to security.

Another factor is whether I want my car at my destination --- sometimes it's a necessity other times it's just more hassle. We took a train from Boston to NYC a few years ago largely to avoid having to park in Manhattan. However a couple months later I drove from Boston to New Jersey, which was both further and I was by myself. The difference is that if I'm going to a city with cheap parking and no public transportation then I want to have my car when I get there. This is of course one of the basic issues that HSR zealots overlook, nobody is going to take HSR from Houston to Dallas or Miami to Tampa because you don't want to take the metro bus around once you arrive.

Charlotte
Joined
Apr '11
Charlotte
J. C. Casteel:  And the freedom to whip into a quick shop at will for a microwave burrito is enough to assuage my fear of a head-on with a tweeting cheerleader.

J.C., the freedom to eat a microwave burrito is no kind of freedom at all.

:-)

(Just kidding. But if I ever go on a road trip with you, can I make mine a bag of salt-n-vinegar chips?)


Joined
Jul '11
Rascalfair

Our farthest grandchildren are 1100 miles.  I prefer to drive for all the reasons above.  Actually, as it takes nearly all day to "fly" a 2.5 hr. flight, the drive only adds a few hours the next day, and I have our car, can change our schedule, stop when I wish, carry whatever I wish including my trusty Kimber .45, and I don't get treated like a piece of dog [expletive] en route.

Edited on August 3, 2011 at 3:40pm
The Great Adventure!
Joined
Dec '10
The Great Adventure!

I've logged a little over 2 million miles in the air over the past 15 years.  I've got 2 rules of thumb - one for business, one for pleasure.  For business, if it's over 5 hours driving, I fly.  Unfortunately, when you live in Portland, the only cities of any size that fall within the 5 hour range are Seattle and Spokane.  

For pleasure I extend it out a little further, depending on how much pleasure time I have on my hands.  I'll drive to LA (about 17-18 hours) if I've got a full vacation week (9 days), breaking it up into 2 days each way.  If the number of days is limited - like for a long weekend - 8 hours is the max.  That means Boise or Sacramento.

ctruppi
Joined
Apr '11
ctruppi

The Great Adventure!: I've logged a little over 2 million miles in the air over the past 15 years.  I've got 2 rules of thumb - one for business, one for pleasure.  For business, if it's over 5 hours driving, I fly.  Unfortunately, when you live in Portland, the only cities of any size that fall within the 5 hour range are Seattle and Spokane.  

For pleasure I extend it out a little further, depending on how much pleasure time I have on my hands.  I'll drive to LA (about 17-18 hours) if I've got a full vacation week (9 days), breaking it up into 2 days each way.  If the number of days is limited - like for a long weekend - 8 hours is the max.  That means Boise or Sacramento. · Aug 3 at 5:40am

Ditto here, with several flights every month.  Being in NJ, there are lots of great driving destinations that I visit frequenly for work - Boston, Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Washington.  Prior to 9/11, I always flew to these places.  With the family, we love to take long driving vacations and have gone to FL and SC several times.


Joined
Jan '11
BThompson

1000 miles is waaay too far for me. I don't mind driving, but I don't especially like it. I feel just as cooped up in a car as I do a plane, but on a plane I can at least read, watch a movie, etc. not to mention I can walk around, a little bit, if I want to stretch my legs. When I do the math I estimate about 2.5 - 3.5 hours time for me getting to the airport, going through security, waiting at the gate, boarding, unboarding, getting bags, renting car, and getting to destination, then I add the flight time. Anything over 6 hours seems like a waste of time to me. So I'm going to say my limit is 400 miles.

I guess I just have too many memories of being crammed in the back of the station wagon with the luggage when my Mom, Dad, and four brothers and sisters used to go on vacation. Being in the car is no fun for me.

Edited on August 3, 2011 at 3:12pm
StickerShock
Joined
Jun '10
StickerShock

 It depends on the time allowed.  I love the freedom of putting bikes and anything else we want in the back of the mini van and hitting the road on our own time schedule.  But we do need to fly on the next three trips scheduled for this year:  Ireland, South Carolina, and Las Vegas.  It can't be helped.  My daughter's band booked two rental cars to head out to a gig in Wisconsin.  Flights are outrageously priced, and limits/surchages & headaches for instruments as carry-ons for eight members would have been crazy......they'll share the 2100 mile round trip driving duties.  Glad I'm not in the cars with them!

Leslie Watkins
Joined
Sep '10
Leslie Watkins

At a conference I was at several years ago, a panel participant told the story of how the CEO of Southwest Airlines was being criticized by other airlines for setting prices way below the industry standard, to which the CEO replied (something to the effect of): what you don't understand is, we're not competing against other airlines; we're competing against the automobile.

Misthiocracy
Joined
Aug '10
Misthiocracy

I've driven 2,611 kms rather  than fly. However, it was largely because I had a lot of computer gear to take with me, and shipping it overnight would have been one heck of a hassle. Plus, every Canuckistani  should drive the Trans-Canada Highway at least once. Northern Ontario is fantastic.

Glenn the Iconoclast
Joined
Apr '11
Glenn the Iconoclast

I stopped flying back when they started requiring photo ID (sometime in the 80's, I guess), so there's no distance in the CONUS I won't drive.  Before that I enjoyed flying for distances as short as a couple hundred miles.  I particularly enjoyed being invited into the cockpit (infrequently) when the pilots found out I was an aircraft mechanic.  I don't imagine that happens much anymore, or courtesy visits extended to private pilots.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In