Kids love Happy Meals -- more for the toys than the food. So now the San Francisco City Council (that venerable body of philosopher kings) is seriously considering

legislation [that] would ban toys from most kids meals sold at McDonald's, Burger King and other chains unless the meals meet more stringent calorie and sodium limits. The legislation also would require fruit or veggies in each meal.

More details in this article (thanks to Andrew Sullivan's Nanny State Watch). So let me get this straight: the Constitution forbids a State from defining marriage, but it's okay to dictate the contents of a Happy Meal?

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :


Joined
Jul '10
Jesus Horowitz

how do you define a kids meal?

there is not an exclusively kids burger

there is not an exclusively kids fries

there is not an exclusively kids drink

Thus the toy is what defines the "kids" part of "kids meal"

It is like banning the color red from all red balloons that are sold.

James Poulos, Ed.

Soon, Adam, the only permissible definition of happiness will be hope. Sound familiar? As goes America, so goes McDonald's.

Edited on Aug 20, 2010 at 7:51am
Trace Urdan
Joined
May '10
Trace Urdan

Oh come on Adam. We expect more from Ricochet contributors than simple San Francisco bashing. That's baby stuff and does no justice to your considerable talents. That's like a blog post questioning Britney Spears parenting skills.

Midget Faded Rattlesnake
Joined
Aug '10
Midget Faded Rattlesnake

"Heather Has Two Mommies, But No Happy Meal" sounds like a good title for a novelty bluegrass number.

Kenneth
Joined
Jul '10
Kenneth

And Heather will have no hamster, either. The San Francisco Commission of Animal Control and Welfare is considering a measure that would ban the sale of pets in the city because unwise citizens sometimes purchase pets on impulse and then abandon them.

Alternatively, Heather and her mommies may be required to attend classes on pet care before being issued a license to own a pet.

Certainly will be a boon to pet stores in neighboring communities.

Which will then lead to Arizona-style draconian measures:

"Excuse me, ma'am. May I see your pet's papers?"

Rob Long

It's just a matter of offering up a locally-sensitive choice, Adam. The burgers at any McDonald's in India are made with lamb, not beef. The breakfast items, which they stop serving at 10AM here in the United States, are served all day in China, where people eat eggs and bacon at all hours.

How about making the Happy Meal toy more Bay Area friendly? Put in a Joan Armatrading CD. Or a DVD of "Glee." Problem solved.

Kenneth
Joined
Jul '10
Kenneth

Rob Long: It's just a matter of offering up a locally-sensitive choice, Adam. The burgers at any McDonald's in India are made with lamb, not beef. The breakfast items, which they stop serving at 10AM here in the United States, are served all day in China, where people eat eggs and bacon at all hours.

How about making the Happy Meal toy more Bay Area friendly? Put in a Joan Armatrading CD. Or a DVD of "Glee." Problem solved. · Aug 20 at 10:07am

Or a homeless-person action figure.

G.A. Dean
Joined
May '10
G.A. Dean

Is not "the pursuit of Happy Meals" one of those self-evident rights? I'm sure I read that somewhere.

Edited on Aug 20, 2010 at 10:31am
Trace Urdan
Joined
May '10
Trace Urdan
Kenneth: And Heather will have no hamster, either. The San Francisco Commission of Animal Control and Welfare is considering a measure that would ban the sale of pets in the city because unwise citizens sometimes purchase pets on impulse and then abandon them. · Aug 20 at 9:38am

Oh Kenneth. I'm offering you this friendly advice because I like you and you are a relative newbie here. But you do NOT want to go to that place where you risk bringing Claire and her verbal martial arts down on you. She eats Libertarianish types for lunch on the issue of animal protection. Best stick to the soft drink Gestapo being dispatched to vending machines on SF city property.

tabula rasa
Joined
Jun '10
tabula rasa

G.A. Dean: Is not "the pursuit of Happy Meals" one of those self-evident rights? I'm sure I read that somewhere. · Aug 20 at 10:23am

Edited on Aug 20 at 10:31 am

Yes, it's in the same section as the abortion, gay marriage, and free healthcare language.

Edited on Aug 20, 2010 at 10:42am
Paul DeRocco
Joined
Aug '10
Paul DeRocco

"The legislation also would require fruit or veggies in each meal." Peel them a grape.

Adam Freedman
Trace Urdan: Oh come on Adam. We expect more from Ricochet contributors than simple San Francisco bashing. That's baby stuff and does no justice to your considerable talents. That's like a blog post questioning Britney Spears parenting skills. · Aug 20 at 9:04am

Dear oh dear, I have no axe to grind against San Francisco. I'll attack liberal lunacy in any quarter, but SF does seem to generate more than its fair share. And SF is, after all, the political environment that nutures Nancy Pelosi, so I think it's fair game.

Having said that, I'll concede your point about my having considerable talents. Now on to Britney!

Aaron Miller
Joined
May '10
Aaron Miller

James Poulos, Ed.: As goes America, so goes McDonald's. · Aug 20 at 7:51am

Edited on Aug 20 at 07:51 am

Ricochet line of the week.

Nick Stuart
Joined
May '10
Nick Stuart

If hamsters are outlawed, only outlaws will have hamsters.

Peter Christofferson
Joined
Jul '10
Peter Christofferson

Thank you, San Francisco City Council, for one more reason not to take my family to your crappy town for a visit. On the other hand, I hear Tempe and Phoenix are nice places to go in springtime…

Kenneth
Joined
Jul '10
Kenneth

You'll pry my hamster from my cold, dead hand!

Kenneth
Joined
Jul '10
Kenneth

Trace Urdan

Kenneth: And Heather will have no hamster, either. The San Francisco Commission of Animal Control and Welfare is considering a measure that would ban the sale of pets in the city because unwise citizens sometimes purchase pets on impulse and then abandon them. · Aug 20 at 9:38am

Oh Kenneth. I'm offering you this friendly advice because I like you and you are a relative newbie here. But you do NOT want to go to that place where you risk bringing Claire and her verbal martial arts down on you. She eats Libertarianish types for lunch on the issue of animal protection. Best stick to the soft drink Gestapo being dispatched to vending machines on SF city property. · Aug 20 at 10:23am

Earthquake-proofing Istanbul, teaching martial arts to gals in burkha's, and saving the hamster! Claire's a busy, busy little bee.

Humza Ahmad
Joined
Jul '10
Humza Ahmad

I have to agree with Mr. Urdan. San Fran is too easy a target to make a point out of. We all know liberals want greater control of our lives, in some ways silly, in some ways serious, and we all know the Bay Area epitomizes this.


Joined
Jul '10
heathermc

SF government is awesome in its attempt to bring about Heaven on Earth, where hamsters lie down with lions and lambs, in happy kindly vegetarian joy. And it works! Just look at the results: Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, great exemplars for all of us rubes. So many of us are unkind to our pets (and other living things.) Why didn't we think of doing a study, and making a regulation, with back up bureaucracy to solve this terrible situation????


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In