A couple weeks before the midterms, John Yoo issued a call for suggestions on what Republicans should prioritize on their legislative agenda as they assume control of the House. At the top of Professor Yoo's own list was the repeal and/or defunding of ObamaCare.

A new Quinnipiac poll suggests that the repeal of ObamaCare might be just the place to begin:

Given three choices on the new health care reform law:

  • 30 percent of American voters say expand it;
  • 18 percent say leave it as it is;
  • 47 percent say repeal it.

(h/t Chris Good)

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

John Marzan
Joined
Oct '10
John Marzan

(30% say expand it) + (18% leave it as it is) = 48% > 47% for repeal?

Brian Watt
Joined
Jun '10
Brian Watt

Unless it's ruled unconstitutional by the Supremes...

In January 2011, there will be the votes to defund.

In January 2013 there will be votes to repeal and hopefully a Republican president.

As long as Obama enjoys veto power beyond any mathematical possibility of an override it can only be defunded.

Any talk or energies put behind a repeal effort are a waste of time until January 2013. There are other issues that need to be dismantled as soon as possible including Cap & Trade and any so-called comprehensive immigration reform that doesn't first include verifiable border security and the elimination of unlawful sanctuary cities.

Edited on Nov 18, 2010 at 8:58pm
Brian Watt
Joined
Jun '10
Brian Watt
Edited on Nov 18, 2010 at 9:00pm
Diane Ellis, Ed.

Brian Watt: As long as Obama enjoys veto power beyond any mathematical possibility of an override it can only be defunded.

Any talk or energies put behind a repeal effort are a waste of time until January 2013.

Brian, have you read Bill McGurn's take on Boehner's "Plan B"? Here's Bill's argument:

Mr. Boehner says his priority is full repeal. But he also knows he is in for a fight. In this fight, hearings would help Republicans accomplish several things.

First, they would help define the law's problems for the American people.

Second, by defining the problems, Republicans would be in a better position to define and sell their more market-friendly fixes.

Third, by doing the first two, Republicans might get enough votes here and there to kick out key rungs of ObamaCare.

Even if Republicans could not get the president to sign anything into law, by forcing votes and vetoes Republicans would drive home an important point: If the American people really want repeal, they will need to vote for a Republican president in 2012.

Brian Watt
Joined
Jun '10
Brian Watt

Yes, that is all well and good and a fine strategy but it does not contradict what I said. Unless there are the votes to override a veto, the law will stay intact.

Look I'm not a Congressional staffer or a policy wonk but "kicking out key rungs" requires changing the law. Changing the law requires the President's signature. The likelihood of that is remote. Will it embarrass the President. Perhaps. Will it embarrass him so much that he'd be willing to sign into law a new version. I don't think so.

There are other tools at his disposal to take healthcare off the front burner. Wars and fiscal meltdowns with more emergency measures have a way of doing that.

Doug Lee
Joined
Nov '10
Doug Lee

The legal fight (which I'm a part of) will put pressure on both Congress and the President to take action. I believe that multiple courts will find the individual mandate to be unconstitutional -- you take out the mandate, and the entire act falls, period. Once the adverse rulings start coming in, there will be immense pressure on the administration to do something to preempt a ruling by the SCOTUS that will forever destroy any hope of salvaging the President's signature piece of legislation, only with the GOP in control of the House, he'll have to accept drastic changes.

That's my theory, anyway. Mostly, I'm concerned with taking out the individual mandate in any way possible. It presents the gravest threat to our republican form of government (and our freedom) of any legislative act in our history.

Brian Watt
Joined
Jun '10
Brian Watt

I'm hopeful that the court cases also gather steam before the final appeal to the Supreme Court. There is a chance that Obama distances himself from Pelosi and claim that the bill was really her baby, is flawed and needs some correction and not really the legislation the he would have preferred essentially throwing Pelosi under the bus. I will concede that anything IS possible, I'm just arguing about the probability of significant changes in the law because Obama at the end of the day wants a single-payer solution.

I think the calculus for Obama is that he probably realizes that in order to be any kind of credible candidate for 2012 he must soften his rhetoric and compromise but he will be fighting his inner Marxist demon to do so. It will be fascinating to see how he grapples with this and if expressions like "fighting our enemies" don't from time to time blurt out to placate his base. Recent reports indicate that Soros isn't prepared for Obama to soften his position or pull up the reins on his agenda. But I don't know how he wins another term without doing so.

Robert McKay
Joined
Oct '10
ElevenX

Thirty percent are for expansion?! Thirty Percent?! And 18% say it is good as is?! Half the people think that ridiculous piece of legislation is either A-okay or not going far enough. Get your heads on straight America!

48% don't realize that bill was the size of the Hindenburg and its contents just as deadly.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In