Just when you thought the world could not get any more degraded and perverse, the European Court of Human rights--believe it or not!--proves you wrong. Germany's ban on incest has been upheld:

A brother and sister from Germany who had an incestuous relationship, arguing they had the right to a family life, have lost their European court case.

Patrick Stuebing and Susan Karolewski had four children together, two of whom are described as disabled.

The European Court of Human Rights said Germany was entitled to ban incest.

I suppose it's bad news that this could be news at all, but today is glass-half-full day.

I'll spare you the photo of the couple on the grounds that the very idea of this is so disgusting as to inherently violate the spirit of the Code of Conduct. Click on the link at your own discretion.

Comments:


KC Mulville
Joined
Jan '11
KC Mulville

Incest is declared illegal ... OK! Gotta start somewhere.

Edited on April 18, 2012 at 2:47pm
AmishDude
Joined
Dec '10
AmishDude

It's really amazing how much secular morality is based on our cultural prejudices. What do you think of:

The age of consent in Germany being 14,

The age of consent in Alabama being 16?

Polygamists in Utah,

Polygamists in Greenwich Village?

Edited on April 18, 2012 at 4:28pm
Claire Berlinski, Ed.
AmishDude: It's really amazing how much secular morality is based on our cultural prejudices.What do you think of:The age of consent in Germany being 14.The age of consent in Alabama being 16.Polygamists in Utah.Polygamists in Greenwich Village. · 3 minutes ago

Actually, the incest taboo is universal. You'll occasionally find some batcake anthropologist who's convinced he's found an exception on some Polynesian island or something, but the only principle more universal than the incest taboo is the principle that anthropologists go nuts after too many years in the field. 

Albert Arthur
Joined
Oct '11
Albert Arthur

Most people have an involuntary revulsion to the idea of incest, don't they? I know I do. I threw up a little in my mouth just now.

Mothership_Greg
Joined
Nov '11
Mothership_Greg

This sounds awfully familiar:

The couple insist that their love is no different to any other.

Why stop two consenting adults from being with their soulmate, you puritans?

Commence with the 500 comments of wailing and gnashing of teeth.

EJHill
Joined
May '10
EJHill

Two posts from Claire this morning... searching for good news she gives us the prostrate and incest... my, my Miss Berlinski... Where is your mind today?


Joined
Mar '12
Madcap

Claire Berlinski, Ed.

AmishDude: It's really amazing how much secular morality is based on our cultural prejudices.What do you think of:The age of consent in Germany being 14.The age of consent in Alabama being 16.Polygamists in Utah.Polygamists in Greenwich Village. · 3 minutes ago

Actually, the incest taboo is universal. You'll occasionally find some batcake anthropologist who's convinced he's found an exception on some Polynesian island or something, but the only principle more universal than the incest taboo is the principle that anthropologists go nuts after too many years in the field.  · 22 minutes ago

It also appears very, very early in life without trying to create it. Unrelated children raised collectively on Israeli kibbutzim were unable to consider each other as potential partners when they were adults. They had to leave the kibbutz to find marriage partners. This couple never imprinted on each other as siblings because they were raised apart, which is the only reason they could stomach the relationship.

Claire Berlinski, Ed.
EJHill: Two posts from Claire this morning... searching for good news she gives us the prostrate and incest... my, my Miss Berlinski... Where is your mind today? · 16 minutes ago

On curing cancer and the small, shy hope afforded by a European court affirming the most ancient of values. Where is yours?

Valiuth
Joined
Apr '11
Valiuth

Yes, good news and all...but with the basis of the ruling being that incest gives you higher likely hood of disabled children as the reason seems a bit weak and eugenic to me.  As the lawyers for the defense pointed out incest is not the sole way to increase those odds...

Claire Berlinski, Ed.
Valiuth: Yes, good news and all...but with the basis of the ruling being that incest gives you higher likely hood of disabled children as the reason seems a bit weak and eugenic to me.  As the lawyers for the defense pointed out incest is not the sole way to increase those odds... · 0 minutes ago

I suppose they couldn't just say, "Yuck!"

EJHill
Joined
May '10
EJHill
Claire Berlinski, Ed.  Where isyours?

The wife usually doesn't let me have it until noon ET after my second cup of coffee... But I'm always perusing the posts for photoshop opportunities (like here and here) and you're simply not giving a poor guy anything to work with!

Keith Rice
Joined
Apr '12
Highlama

Are not the arguments used to normalize homosexuality the same arguments to normalize incest? OK, so reproduction is a variance - what about a couple that are sterile? What about homosexual sibs? Why should they be prevented from the  benefits of marriage?

Valiuth
Joined
Apr '11
Valiuth

Claire Berlinski, Ed.

Valiuth: Yes, good news and all...but with the basis of the ruling being that incest gives you higher likely hood of disabled children as the reason seems a bit weak and eugenic to me.  As the lawyers for the defense pointed out incest is not the sole way to increase those odds... · 0 minutes ago

I suppose they couldn't just say, "Yuck!" · 6 minutes ago

Yuck is a stronger argument in my opinion if you can explain why you feel "Yuck". 

Highlama: Are not the arguments used to normalize homosexuality the same arguments to normalize incest? OK, so reproduction is a variance - what about a couple that are sterile? What about homosexual sibs? Why should they be prevented from the  benefits of marriage? · 3 minutes ago

You can indeed use the same arguments, for the most part. I don't think that need invalidate anything. The prohibition against incest extends well beyond marriage. We generally prohibit the act as well. This was true for homosexuality once too...but I think it foolish to lump all similar things into one group. Incest is different than homosexulaity.  

Basil Fawlty
Joined
Mar '11
Basil Fawlty
Highlama: Are not the arguments used to normalize homosexuality the same arguments to normalize incest? OK, so reproduction is a variance - what about a couple that are sterile? What about homosexual sibs? Why should they be prevented from the  benefits of marriage? · 13 minutes ago

Bingo!

Basil Fawlty
Joined
Mar '11
Basil Fawlty

Valiuth

Claire Berlinski, Ed.

 
Highlama: Are not the arguments used to normalize homosexuality the same arguments to normalize incest? OK, so reproduction is a variance - what about a couple that are sterile? What about homosexual sibs? Why should they be prevented from the  benefits of marriage? · 3 minutes ag

 Incest is different than homosexulaity.   · 6 minutes ago

Your argument would be stronger if you would explain why you feel this way.

Charlotte
Joined
Apr '11
Charlotte

Incest...it's all relative.

Charlotte
Joined
Apr '11
Charlotte
EJHill photoshop opportunities

May I suggest a portmanteau: photoshopportunities.

James Of England
Joined
Apr '11
James Of England

Claire Berlinski, Ed.

AmishDude: It's really amazing how much secular morality is based on our cultural prejudices.What do you think of:The age of consent in Germany being 14.The age of consent in Alabama being 16.Polygamists in Utah.Polygamists in Greenwich Village. 

Actually, the incest taboo is universal. You'll occasionally find some batcake anthropologist who's convinced he's found an exception on some Polynesian island or something, but the only principle more universal than the incest taboo is the principle that anthropologists go nuts after too many years in the field.  ·

Sibling incest is a pretty strong taboo. Cousin incest is where most of the civil rights action is in the US at the moment. Nepotistic incest is either disgusting or normal, depending on where you are. It's like saying that the prohibition against pedophilia is universal; this is kind of true, but only if you limit pedophilia to sex with the under nines.

Even if "yuck" was a universal response, though, do you think that it should be sufficient to criminalize acts between consenting adults?

Also, in Germany, you can get 3 years jail time; how did they get to four kids?

EJHill
Joined
May '10
EJHill

Charlotte! I see a registered trademark in your future!

Joseph Eagar
Joined
Oct '10
Joseph Eagar
Highlama: Are not the arguments used to normalize homosexuality the same arguments to normalize incest? OK, so reproduction is a variance - what about a couple that are sterile? What about homosexual sibs? Why should they be prevented from the  benefits of marriage? · 1 hour ago

It's not the same at all.  Incest is incest, whether it's heterosexual or homosexual couples.  There's no moral link between homosexuality and incest.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In