images

Folks, on good-news-only-day, some especially good news:

I just received the galleys of our own Adam Freedman's forthcoming book, The Naked Constitution, opening it with the special dread one feels when opening a book by a friend.  (If it's no good, you're going to have to lie to your friend and tell him it is.  If it is good, you'll find yourself wishing you'd written it yourself.)  Adam's book?  Wonderful--brilliant, lively, straightforward, and pugnacious.  Also very, very ambitious.  Adam intends in The Naked Constitution to reclaim our founding document for us, the laymen, the ordinary citizens the Constitution was intended to serve. 

A taste:

At America's law schools, students are taught to regard the Constitution as an enigmatic puzzle accessible only to tenured faculty and enlightened judges.  Entire academic careers have been built upon the proposition that the Constitution cannot possibly mean what it says.  To get a sense of the bogus mystery surrounding the Constitution, just take a look at some of the titles at your local law school library:  Our Elusive Constitution, Our Unsettled Constitution, Our Unknown Constitution, The Invisible Constitution, The Dynamic Constitution, and The Unpredictable Constitution.

Get a grip.  We're not talking about the Dead Sea Scrolls or the Prophecies of Nostradamus.  We're talking about a document of 4,300 words--7,500 if you throw in all the amendments.  The average New Yorker essay is just getting warmed up at 7,500 words.  The Constitution is not simple, but it's not all that complicated either....

Why all the hocus-pocus?  It's not because the Constitution is obscure, but rather because it is all-too clear, and it stands for things that politicians, judges, and academics can't abide.

In a word, The Naked Constitution is a beaut.

Oh, and that part about wishing I'd written it myself?  No problem. Although Adam has composed the book in a lucid, easy, accessible style, only a lawyer could have marshaled the history and the arguments that Adam marshals, and I'm no lawyer.  I can therefore read The Naked Constitution with a pleasure uncomplicated by, ahem, envy.

Comments:


James Gawron
Joined
Dec '10
James Gawron

Adam and Peter,

I love the quote.  I'm going to get the book and read it.  Adam enjoy the royalty.

Why all the hocus-pocus?  We just found out one answer.  Hidden in the 2600 page hocus-pocus unconstitutional ObamaCare Law was $17 Trillion in unfunded liability.  I think you'd call that Grand Theft Larceny.

I think the big crooks just got caught.

I'll be reading the book.

Regards,

Jim

Adam Freedman

Peter, you're too kind.Jim: my first sale -- Hooray!

Pseudodionysius
Joined
Sep '10
Pseudodionysius

I will take no end of joy in buying copies not only for myself, but for all those poor unsuspecting college students I meet who announce they're going to a US law school. 

Barfly
Joined
Oct '11
Barfly

Preordered it. I will be pleasantly surprised one evening in October.

Scott Reusser
Joined
May '10
Scott Reusser

Sounds fantastic and congratulations.

Naming it Eight Million Stories in the Naked Constitution might have gotten it in more law libraries.

Aaron Miller
Joined
May '10
Aaron Miller

Looking forward to it!

dogsbody
Joined
Sep '10
dogsbody

Preordered!  I really enjoyed Adam's recent commentary on the arguments for and against Obamacare before the Supremes, so I'm looking forward to this one.

Albert Arthur
Joined
Oct '11
Albert Arthur

On my way to Amazon to preorder it!

Does this mean you're free to have a Brooklyn Ricochet meetup some time soon?

Skarv
Joined
May '10
Skarv

"If it's no good, you're going to have to lie to your friend and tell him it is."
Why? Your friend is better off if you offer honesty.

Peter Robinson
Skarv: "If it's no good, you're going to have to lie to your friend and tell him it is."
Why? Your friend is better off if you offer honesty. · 37 minutes ago

In theory, yes, of course.  In theory.

Larry Koler
Joined
Jun '10
Larry Koler

Peter Robinson

Skarv: "If it's no good, you're going to have to lie to your friend and tell him it is."
Why? Your friend is better off if you offer honesty. · 37 minutes ago

In theory, yes, of course.  In theory. · 24 minutes ago

I think we had a post about this recently: "Do I look Fat?"

Larry Koler
Joined
Jun '10
Larry Koler

It's obvious that the leftists want to create a priesthood (not a new idea, I know) and the first step is to pretend that the text of the Constitution is so complicated that we need someone very pure and smart and "nuanced" to be involved in its interpretation. Only in this way can they get away with hogwash about "emanations" from penumbras instead of the clear words that are there and the intent of those words as they were first written and understood.

I love Walter Williams' retort to the notion of a "living Constitution" -- he says, "OK, how would you like to play basketball with me where the rules are living?"

If you are not in charge of determining those living rules then it will be difficult to keep your enthusiasm going after the first rule change. 

Most important of all is that the one who posits the living nature of the Constitution has a distinct advantage over the person who thinks we must work with the actual text and not our imaginations.

How many times do we all fall for rational sounding statements only to realize -- too late -- that they were only pretending interest as a diversion.

PracticalMary
Joined
Nov '11
PracticalMary

Sounds interesting and I will read it, however I would leave out the 'written by a lawyer' in further reviews.

Gus Marvinson
Joined
Mar '11
Gus Marvinson

Adam, you've got another sale! I look forward to reading it.

Trace
Joined
May '10
Trace Urdan

A very gracious and I'm certain apt review Peter, though I believe that Adam has been trying very hard to shed the descriptor 'pugnacious' since high school...

G.A. Dean
Joined
May '10
G.A. Dean

Looking forward to it. Shame we have to wait until October. This is a subject we need to talk about throughout this election season.

Adam Freedman

Thanks everyone for your good wishes, and pre-orders!  I'll have to figure out some way to organize a Ricochet book signing. 

And Trace - are you kidding?  "Pugnacious" was my favorite part of the review!


Joined
Apr '12
TexasCowboy

Sounds good.  I recently was writing an article  which I may have to include as an informed current reference: 

Government Vs. Liberty, sub-title: Buying blind loyalty and votes with more dishonest, immoral promises and envy

As our forefathers recognized, understood and explained in the Declaration of Independence and provided for in our short written Constitution, the only safe and legal government in America for Americans is a strictly limited government with specified divided powers and a people properly schooled in Law, Liberty and Self-Control under the Creator God. See Shredding the Constitution, AmThinker.com, 4/187/12,  by Janet Levy  and Excerpts from Romney’ Speech to the NRA

 Because of human nature’s natural born proclivity to blind, selfish, immoral, arrogant and destructive self-love properly identified as envy, as government grows the God-given rights and freedoms of the American people decline exponentially!


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In