CNN reports that former six-term U.S. congresswoman Cynthia McKinney "slammed U.S. policy on Libyan state TV late Saturday and stressed the 'last thing we need to do is spend money on death, destruction and war.'"
You remember McKinney. She's the one who assaulted a Capitol police officer about five years ago. She ran for president on the Green Party ticket. She's won many awards from the left, including one "because she was willing to challenge the Bush administration and called for an investigation into 9-11 when few others dared to air their criticism and questions." She attempted to run a blockade in 2009 to deliver supplies to Gaza.

So she goes on  a Libyan station that is fiercely loyal to Moammar Gadhafi and her interview was spliced with pro-Gadhafi propoganda. She also denounced President Obama and his economic policies.

I know that going on an enemy television show and denouncing the U.S. is probably what she does every Saturday, but I'm curious about the U.S. reaction to such stunts -- and whether it's changed over time.

I imagine there was a time when giving such help to the enemy would result in prosecution. Now, we don't really care. Is that better? Should anything be done?

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

EJHill
Joined
May '10
EJHill

What used to pass for treason is now referred to as "mainstream liberalism." Denouncing America is what they do.

Jim Chase
Joined
Jun '10
Jim Chase

Carter/McKinney 2012:  Because We're Not Done Mucking Up America. 

KC Mulville
Joined
Jan '11
KC Mulville

My reaction hasn't changed. 

Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque

"Tripoli Gardenia"?

dogsbody
Joined
Sep '10
dogsbody

I lived in Atlanta for almost a year, early in the last decade.  One of my few regrets on leaving was that I would no longer be able to vote against McKinney.

McKinney and her flatulent ilk escape prosecution because they aren't worth the energy.  In WW II, we were in a war of national survival, and traitors like Tokyo Rose mattered more.

anon_academic
Joined
Aug '10
anon_academic

On the substance of the issue I'm inclined to think even a stopped clock is right twice a day. Our intervention is a war of no strategic interest, creates more violence than would have been the case under the "Bhengazi massacre" scenario, that in the long-run is likely to cost us political capital, and which most important of all mocks our sovereignty and constitutional government by putting the approval of UNSC and the Arab League above that of Congress (illegally failing even to get the retroactive approval of Congress within 60 days, as required by the War Powers Act).

That said, there is a time and a place for expressing such thoughts and a patriot does it among his fellow citizens, and not in a venue controlled by the country that (however imprudently) we have made our enemy.

Basically, opposing the "limited kinetic military action" that will last "days not weeks" in the NY Times or here on Ricochet or standing on a street corner is patriotism, but expressing the same thoughts on the state television of the enemy power is treason.

Edited on May 23, 2011 at 9:31am
Mollie Hemingway, Ed.

anon_academic: On the substance of the issue I'm inclined to think even a stopped clock is right twice a day. ...

That said, there is a time and a place for expressing such thoughts and a patriot does it among his fellow citizens, and not in a venue controlled by the country that (however imprudently) we have made our enemy.

Basically, opposing the "limited kinetic military action" that will last "days not weeks" in the NY Times or here on Ricochet or standing on a street corner is patriotism, but expressing the same thoughts on the state television of the enemy power is treason. · May 23 at 9:28am

Edited on May 23 at 09:31 am

Precisely. I'm 100% opposed to intervening in Libya and I still think what she's doing is not right.

Aaron Miller
Joined
May '10
Aaron Miller
Jim Chase: Carter/McKinney 2012:  Because We're Not Done Mucking Up America.  

Carter should be in prison for impersonating an ambassador of the United States (attempting national diplomacy without authorization).

Mollie Hemingway, Ed.

So she goes on  a Libyan station that is fiercely loyal to Moammar Gadhafi and her interview was spliced with pro-Gadhafi propoganda. ·

That merits Congressional censure.

Mollie Hemingway, Ed.: She attempted to run a blockade in 2009 to deliver supplies to Gaza.

That merits prison.


Joined
Nov '10
Charles Lavergne
Mollie Hemingway, Ed.: I imagine there was a time when giving such help to the enemy would result in prosecution. Now, we don't really care. Is that better? Should anything be done? ·

Ask Jane Fonda.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In