Freedom Flotilla logo

As expected, the news that the Turkish group IHH -- the guiding light behind the second annual "humanitarian" flotilla to Gaza -- will not participate has cast the whole enterprise into doubt.

An unspecified source told Haaretz that "problems have arisen on other boats that are supposed to take part in the flotilla." There were originally supposed to be thirty boats involved, but that had already been scaled back to about ten when the IHH news broke. Now the number of boats expected to participate is five to eight. The number of activists, too, has fallen precipitously, from 1,000 to an expected 300.

In related news, the Israeli Arab Higher Monitoring Committee, a political action group made up of Arab MKs and Arab local council heads, had been invited by the IHH to participate in the flotilla. The group held a meeting yesterday at which it was supposed to decide who would constitute its delegation. It decided instead to remove the flotilla from the agenda.

UPDATE: Sisyphus said in the comments that he'd like to know the why here, not just the what. I think it's a fair bet that the IHH was leaned on by the Turkish government, which is horrified by what's going on next door in Syria. The wheels are starting to come off their look-eastward strategy. This is a time to shore up the relationship with Israel and make nice to the Americans, not throw the government's weight behind a Hamas-supporting NGO with ties to Al Qaeda.

As far as the wider disenchantment with the flotilla is concerned, there are several factors at work. One is simply that the absence of the IHH strips the stunt of much of its glamour. Another might be a sense among some activists that jumping up and down about Israel's legal blockade of Gaza, particularly when the Egyptian blockade has been lifted and there is no semblance of a humanitarian crisis present, is a little unseemly when there is a genuine humanitarian crisis rapidly reaching epic proportions up in Syria.

A critical piece of the puzzle is supplied by the Israel Law Center (Shurat HaDin), led by Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, which is working to stop the ships ahead of time by legal means. James Poulos interviewed her on Pajamas Media TV and she explained the prongs of their strategy thus:

  1. Lawsuits on behalf of victims of Palestinian terrorism designed to seize "any property, including boats, utilized by any party to attempt to run the Israeli naval blockade of Gaza." The plaintiff of the first suit, Dr. Alan Bauer of Chicago, was severely injured along with his son in a terrorist attack by a Palestinian suicide bomber in Jerusalem in 2002. "The Free Gaza Movement and other American-based anti-Israel organizations have raised funds in the United States to outfit the Gaza flotilla ships. The lawsuit contends that furnishing and outfitting the ships, which are being used for hostilities against a US ally, violates American law. The plaintiff rests his claim upon the rarely used 18th-century “informant” statute (18 USC Section 962) that allows a plaintiff (called an “informer”) to privately seize ships outfitted in the United States for use against a US ally" (Jerusalem Post).
  2. Letters to thirty maritime insurance companies "placing [them] on notice concerning the Gaza Flotilla, and warning them that if they provide insurance...that they themselves will be legally liable for any future terrorist attacks perpetrated by Hamas" (Darshan-Lerner in the Jerusalem Post).
  3. A warning letter to the communications giant Inmarsat, "stating that it may be liable for massive damages and criminal prosecution if it provides communication services to ships used by suspected terror organizations in the Gaza flotilla." "We informed them that if they do so, they will be in violation of the American Neutrality Act, which prohibits aiding a group in their struggle against the military of an ally country,” said Darshan-Leitner. “Since Imarsat has offices in the US, the law binds them.”

These tactics are bearing fruit. Darshan-Leitner told James that Lloyds has responded to Shurat HaDin's letter by saying it will not insure any boats participating in the flotilla. A French insurance company didn't respond to the group directly, but announced that it will not insure a boat destined for the flotilla that is coming out of Marseille. Inmarsat has said that as the boats are not owned by Hamas, they are under no obligation to withhold satellite communications services; but Darshan-Leitner counters that the US Attorney General recently indicted a group that provided legal advice to the Tamil Tigers, which is a terrorist organization. If Inmarsat goes ahead, it opens itself up to the possibility of huge liability.

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

Sisyphus
Joined
Jul '10
Sisyphus

Excellent. I find no insight into the motivation for this welcome change, however.

Dave Molinari
Joined
Jun '10
Dave Molinari

I've lost track of the status of the Egypt-Gaza border situation.  If it's open, isn't the flotilla obsolete anyway?  Otherwise, it's just a political stunt.  Oh wait, they'd never stoop to that, would they?  

John Lamoreaux
Joined
Feb '11
John Lamoreaux
Sisyphus: Excellent. I find no insight into the motivation for this welcome change, however. · Jun 19 at 9:35am

After studying the Turkish penal system for a couple of years, noted Turkey-observer Billy Hayes concluded: "To the Turks, everything is `shurla burla', which means `like this, like that'. You never know what will happen. All foreigners are `ayip'.... There are about a thousand things that are `ayip', for instance, you can stab or shoot somebody below the waist but not above because that's intent to kill. So everyone runs around stabbing everyone else in the a**. That's what they call Turkish revenge. I know it must all sound crazy to you, but this place is crazy."

Sisyphus
Joined
Jul '10
Sisyphus

John Lamoreaux

Sisyphus: Excellent. I find no insight into the motivation for this welcome change, however. · Jun 19 at 9:35am

After studying the Turkish penal system for a couple of years, noted Turkey-observer Billy Hayes concluded: "To the Turks, everything is `shurla burla', which means `like this, like that'. You never know what will happen. All foreigners are `ayip'.... There are about a thousand things that are `ayip', for instance, you can stab or shoot somebody below the waist but not above because that's intent to kill. So everyone runs around stabbing everyone else in the a**. That's what they call Turkish revenge. I know it must all sound crazy to you, but this place is crazy." · Jun 19 at 10:22am

Not only stranger than I imagine, but stranger than I can imagine.

Thanks!

Charles Mark
Joined
Aug '10
Charles Mark

Apparently there's a real-life send-off for some local heroes in a hotel in my home town tomorrow.I'm tempted to go there with a "Why Not Syria" poster. Or I might just ignore them.

cdor
Joined
Jun '10
cdor

 It's nice to see the Jews using their legal prowess for something other than ACLU challenges to crosses or Boy Scouts for a change.

Sisyphus
Joined
Jul '10
Sisyphus

Thank you Judith, a very impressive muster of insight.

Israel came to my sharp attention as a student. I knew of the Holocaust, I had seen Patton when it came out, where the great general comes to inspect the camp, and read the Diary of Anne Frank. In 1973 my country was in the throws of a political crisis and a cultural crisis that led to the collapse of our efforts in Vietnam. The President was being revealed to be corrupt and, in critical ways, incompetent. There were whispers that Kissinger was living down, to some extent at least, to the reputation of wartime Germany.

And then, in October of 1973, outnumbered and outgunned, at least on paper, Israel was viciously attacked and responded, forcibly and competently, and prevailed.

What I came away with was a young man's association of Israel with competence. Now that I am able to follow matters day-to-day when I like in the Jerusalem Post, that association has taken the occasional beating. We are all merely human.

Your account here of the efforts against the flotilla remind me of that occasion, and of the sharp competence a free people can exhibit.

Thanks.


Joined
Mar '11
Roy Lofquist

I strongly suspect that messages have been sent. Never again!


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In