Have you been following the sad case of Youcef Nadarkhani? He converted from Islam to Christianity, a crime punishable by death in Iran. Various human rights groups have gotten involved and even the Obama administration has condemned the death sentence.

Former Sen. Gary Hart, of my home state of Colorado,  has written an extraordinary op-ed piece: "The Plight of Youcef Nadarkhani." starts off great but then takes a strange turn.

There are reports that an Iranian Christian pastor, Youcef Nadarkhani, is under threat of execution by the Iranian authorities for blasphemy for his refusal to renounce his Christian faith. Though there are reports of persecution of Christians in many countries, China included, it usually takes the plight of a single identifiable individual to make an otherwise generalized problem -- in this case religious intolerance -- take concrete rather than abstract dimensions.
The re-emergence of the religious right in America during this current presidential campaign, though mild by comparison to threatened executions by radical clerics, should give us cause for concern. Though well over two centuries ago, "witches" were burned in this country and a recent book documents the struggles of Roger Williams against fundamentalist intolerance. The persistent thread of intolerance springs from a narrow fundamentalist insistence on orthodoxy in an age in which strict religious doctrine in some quarters quickly emerged to fill the vacuum of failed 20th century political ideologies. And religious orthodoxy exhibits an almost demented insistence on conformity and intolerance toward political dissent.

And it continues in that vein. Religious conservatives in America are the worst! Not quite so bad as the Iranian mullahs but close.

I get that Gary Hart is still upset about Monkey Business (and losing Donna Rice, the woman he was cheating on his wife with, to Christianity). But now it looks like he's had a complete break with reality.

Comments:


Mel Foil
Joined
Jun '10
etoiledunord

If Hart doesn't like Christians running things, he should try Sharia in Iran, or try the atheist model. North Korea comes to mind. I urge him to experiment, and report back.

St. Salieri
Joined
Feb '11
St. Salieri

Please, no witches were ever burned in the colonies.  They were hung.  Can we at least get our facts straight when making mendacious, outrageous claims, and wallowing in hyperbole.

Edited on February 28, 2012 at 3:30pm
Colin B Lane
Joined
Jun '11
Colin B Lane

I think this definition captures it nicely:

"A non sequitur ( /ˌnɒnˈsɛkwɨtər/Latin for It does not follow) is a conversational and literary device, often used for comedic purposes. It is a comment that, because of its apparent lack of meaning relative to what preceded it, it seems absurd to the point of being humorous or confusing."

Maybe Crazy Gary was just trying to be funny.

jhimmi
Joined
Oct '10
jhimmi

'Though well over two centuries ago, "witches" were burned in this country'

It was over three centuries ago, hence it was not really 'this country', now, was it? I suppose to a leftist, since the Constitution can mean whatever they want it to mean, the fact that the witch trials occurred before the Constitution was written doesn't really mean anything.

'strict religious doctrine in some quarters quickly emerged to fill the vacuum of failed 20th century political ideologies. And religious orthodoxy exhibits an almost demented insistence on conformity and intolerance toward political dissent.'

I guess the fact that political ideologies have basically filled the void created by the loss of religious faith never occurs to a leftist? Does a leftist not see the demented insistence on conformity within their own ranks?

Snow Bird
Joined
Feb '11
Snow Bird

Does anyone anywhere really care what Gary Hart thinks about anything? The Huffers were scraping the bottom of the barrel when they resurrected that dusty relic a few years back. Who will they drag out next, Mike Dukakis?

Paul A. Rahe

As it happens, I know Gary Hart. We spent a very pleasant weekend together in Rome a couple of years ago. He is a thoughtful man -- who is sometimes blinded by partisan prejudice. One would have to be a resolutely blind left-liberal not to roll one's eyes at the turn his argument takes.

Snow Bird
Joined
Feb '11
Snow Bird
Paul A. Rahe: As it happens, I know Gary Hart. We spent a very pleasant weekend together in Rome a couple of years ago. He is a thoughtful man -- who is sometimes blinded by partisan prejudice. One would have to be a resolutely blind left-liberal not to roll one's eyes at the turn his argument takes. · 2 minutes ago

I'm not surprised. Most of my left oriented acquaintances are quite pleasant people - when they aren't talking about politics which, unfortunately, is not often enough.

My point, however, was that too many politicians have the same problem that afflicts athletes and opera singers, among others, who have attained some level of stardom. Too many don't know when to quit. Instead of Vickers, retiring with grace and dignity not far past his peak, we get Pavarottis and Scottos making ever more grotesque spectacles of their decline. Better a politician emulating George H W Bush or Gerald Ford than Jimmy Carter. Hart has had his day. It is time to move on.

Edited on February 28, 2012 at 5:20pm
Joseph Eagar
Joined
Oct '10
Joseph Eagar

Why are urban elites all like this?  I find it frankly offensive.  My ancestors had to sail around the tip of South America and up to California (they then settled San Francisco, a decision many of us now regret), in a long, nasty trip (this is back in the days of wooden sailing ships), to escape religious persecution.

To suggest that American Christians have the same sectarian cleansing instinct today is absurd, and frankly devalues what some of our ancestors did go through.  I mean, come on Gary, Mitt Romney might win the Republican nomination.

Edited on February 28, 2012 at 4:15pm
Paul A. Rahe

Joseph Eagar: Why are urban elites all like this?  I find it frankly offensive.  My ancestors had to sail around the tip of South America and up to California (they then settled San Francisco, a decision many of us now regret), in a long, nasty trip (this is back in the days of wooden sailing ships), to escape religious persecution.

To suggest that American Christians have the same sectarian cleansing instinct today is absurd, and frankly devalues what some of our ancestors did go through.  I mean, come on Gary, Mitt Romney might win the Republican nomination. · 3 minutes ago

Edited 2 minutes ago

 . . . and he might win the Presidency as well. As far as I can see, the America that we now live in could elect a Mormon President or a Jewish President without it being a shock to anyone.

~Paules
Joined
Jun '10
~Paules
   And religious orthodoxy exhibits an almost demented insistence on conformity and intolerance toward political dissent.

Substitute "politically correct ideology" for "religious orthodoxy" and you can see how the left always reveals itself through projection.  

K T Cat
Joined
Sep '10
K T Cat

As a Catholic, I'm proud of our past. At the time we were running the Inquisition, engaging in Crusades and otherwise tormenting heretics, we were #1. Hanging, burning, beheading, we had it all. All that professional pride, however, is just a fond memory. When it comes to pure religious intolerance and industrial persecution, no one and I mean no one can come close to the atheists.

Where we held kangaroo courts and persecuted individuals, they rounded up whole villages and shot them. Where we engaged in focused wars against the infidel, they practiced global slaughter. Where we forced people to pay for their sins with gold, they simply enslaved hundreds of millions of people for generations. We could add several zeroes to the end of our stats and still not be on the same level as the atheists.

It's like comparing George Halas' Bears with the Tom Coughlin's New York Giants. If those two teams played today, the Giants' final score would look like a pinball game.

Give credit where credit is due. As much as I love the Holy Church, the baton has been passed.

I tip my cap to the atheists and so should Gary.

tabula rasa
Joined
Jun '10
tabula rasa

Ah, the "intolerance" meme.  There's nothing quite like left-wing intolerance.  See, e.g., Mark Steyn's lead story in the paper version of the National Review.  Pastor and newspaper in Canada fined $9000 for printing an ad whose entire contents read:

Romans 1:26

Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13

I Corinthians 6:9

Paul A. Rahe

~Paules

   And religious orthodoxy exhibits an almost demented insistence on conformity and intolerance toward political dissent.

Substitute "politically correct ideology" for "religious orthodoxy" and you can see how the left always reveals itself through projection.   · 8 minutes ago

Elegantly put.

thelonious
Joined
May '11
thelonious

K T Cat: As a Catholic, I'm proud of our past. At the time we were running the Inquisition, engaging in Crusades and otherwise tormenting heretics, we were #1. Hanging, burning, beheading, we had it all. All that professional pride, however, is just a fond memory. When it comes to pure religious intolerance and industrial persecution, no one and I meanno one can come close to the atheists.

Where we held kangaroo courts and persecuted individuals, they rounded up whole villages and shot them. Where we engaged in focused wars against the infidel, they practiced global slaughter. Where we forced people to pay for their sins with gold, they simply enslaved hundreds of millions of people for generations. We could add several zeroes to the end of our stats and still not be on the same level as the atheists.

I tip my cap to the atheists and so should Gary. · 1 minute ago

If you throw in not providing contraception for women I'd say you're pretty close to being as oppressive as the atheist regimes.  If we elect Santorum the Catholic Church will once again take the title as most oppressive.

Edited on February 28, 2012 at 4:48pm
K T Cat
Joined
Sep '10
K T Cat

Paul A. Rahe

~Paules

   And religious orthodoxy exhibits an almost demented insistence on conformity and intolerance toward political dissent.

Substitute "politically correct ideology" for "religious orthodoxy" and you can see how the left always reveals itself through projection.   · 8 minutes ago

Elegantly put. · 4 minutes ago

This was a large part of the thesis of Jonah Goldberg's Liberal Fascism.

K T Cat
Joined
Sep '10
K T Cat

thelonious

K T Cat: As a Catholic, I'm proud of our past. At the time we were running the Inquisition, engaging in Crusades and otherwise tormenting heretics, we were #1. Hanging, burning, beheading, we had it all. All that professional pride, however, is just a fond memory. When it comes to pure religious intolerance and industrial persecution, no one and I meanno one can come close to the atheists.

I tip my cap to the atheists and so should Gary. · 1 minute ago

If you throw in not providing contraception for women I'd say you're pretty close to being as oppressive as the atheist regimes.  If we elect Santorum the Catholic will once again take the title as most oppressive. · 1 minute ago

Oh, if only that were true! Sure, we'll have Star Chambers where we execute secret, encoded orders from the Vatican and manipulate things from behind the scenes, but there's little chance that someone as nice as Rick Santorum will ever enforce religious orthodoxy on the planet. To do that, we'd need someone as obsessed with forcing their moral code on everyone else like Barack Obama or Hilary Clinton.

Pilli
Joined
May '11
Pilli

Paul A. Rahe

Joseph Eagar: Why are urban elites all like this?  I find it frankly offensive.  My ancestors had to sail around the tip of South America and up to California (they then settled San Francisco, a decision many of us now regret), in a long, nasty trip (this is back in the days of wooden sailing ships), to escape religious persecution.

To suggest that American Christians have the same sectarian cleansing instinct today is absurd, and frankly devalues what some of our ancestors did go through.  I mean, come on Gary, Mitt Romney might win the Republican nomination. · 3 minutes ago

Edited 2 minutes ago

 . . . and he might win the Presidency as well. As far as I can see, the America that we now live in could elect a Mormon President or a Jewish President without it being a shock to anyone. · 22 minutes ago

Heck, we've already elected two black presidents (Bill Clinton was the first.)  

Mollie Hemingway, Ed.

thelonious

If you throw in not providing contraception for women I'd say you're pretty close to being as oppressive as the atheist regimes.  If we elect Santorum the Catholic Church will once again take the title as most oppressive. · 5 minutes ago

Edited 4 minutes ago

I don't understand this. So fighting to retain one's doctrine against government threat is the same as widespread killing of believers? And if someone who is Catholic is elected, the *church* will become oppressive?

Are we joking or am I missing something? Or a lot of things?

Mollie Hemingway, Ed.

I'm Lutheran, not Catholic, but if the Catholic Church is so powerful in civic affairs, how come they can't even stop this HHS mandate? An odd power they have ...

Palaeologus
Joined
Jul '10
Palaeologus

thelonious

K T Cat: As a Catholic, I'm proud of our past. At the time we were running the Inquisition, engaging in Crusades and otherwise tormenting heretics, we were #1. Hanging, burning, beheading, we had it all. All that professional pride, however, is just a fond memory. When it comes to pure religious intolerance and industrial persecution, no one and I meanno one can come close to the atheists.

Where we held kangaroo courts and persecuted individuals, they rounded up whole villages and shot them. Where we engaged in focused wars against the infidel, they practiced global slaughter. Where we forced people to pay for their sins with gold, they simply enslaved hundreds of millions of people for generations. We could add several zeroes to the end of our stats and still not be on the same level as the atheists.

If you throw in not providing contraception for women I'd say you're pretty close to being as oppressive as the atheist regimes. 

How is not providing something oppressive?

I want a new house. Get me one right now (at no out of pocket cost to me) oppressor!


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In