The most acute student of the Supreme Court that I know predicts a 6-3 vote to uphold ObamaCare in its entirety.  Against which depressing prediction I find myself counterposing the latest on Intrade, which at this hour predicts a "71.9 percent chance" that the Court will strike down the individual mandate.

Whatever the Court announces at 10AM tomorrow morning, ObamaCare delenda est.

And so to bed.

Comments:


Scott Reusser
Joined
May '10
Scott Reusser

.......and good morning!!! 2 1/2 hrs and counting. Fingers crossed.

Zentastik
Joined
May '11
Zentastik

At the end of the day, you are correct, Peter!  Cato the Elder couldn't say it better!  6-3, and the mandate collapses!

~Paules
Joined
Jun '10
~Paules

Peter Robinson

Al Kennedy

dash: "Now, *that's* a wise latina! · 7 minutes ago

Well said, dash. · 3 hours ago

Well said indeed. · 2 hours ago

This is not as improbable as it seems.  We know almost nothing about the internal dynamics of the court.  I suspect that collegiality and the need by younger members to be accepted and taken seriously has played a part in decision making.  Peer approval might prove more important than ideological purity.    


Joined
Dec '11
RobininIthaca

I guess I really don't understand the severability clause, or lack there of, and the idea that the SC can strike down the mandate without declaring the entire law invalid. Wasn't that the point of the Pelosi gang deliberately excluding it?

Sisyphus
Joined
Jul '10
Sisyphus

Even in a loss, there might be a silver lining. The end of any notion in the hinterlands that the institutions of Washington are wise, beneficent, and in some way checked. Only the voters will save the republic.

Sisyphus
Joined
Jul '10
Sisyphus

Or, Dem partisans on the Court may let Obamacare go down to erase what has been a horrible and continuous flogging of the perps and historic Republican ascendancy for three years.

Terry
Joined
Jun '11
Terry

At 9:58 AM Intrade says:  69.9% chance that the mandate goes down.  Let's see if the crowd is correct.

Terry
Joined
Jun '11
Terry
Terry: At 9:58 AM Intrade says:  69.9% chance that the mandate goes down.  Let's see if the crowd is correct. · 6 minutes ago

Settled at 50 after the decision was read.  That's a push, btw.

Douglas
Joined
Mar '11
Douglas
Sisyphus: Even in a loss, there might be a silver lining. The end of any notion in the hinterlands that the institutions of Washington are wise, beneficent, and in some way checked. Only the voters will save the republic. · 1 hour ago

No, we won't. Any notion of America as a truly free country is done. We now see that even when the Constitution explicitly says something, all it takes is a judge to declare that "up" really means "sideways", and that's that... it's now precedent. There is no freedom without economic freedom and freedom of property. The United States Supreme Court wiped that away completely this morning. There is no practical limit to what the government can make you do now. We could pass a Constitutional amendment tomorrow explicitly forbidding this outrage , and future judges would simply rule "that's not what it really means", and void it. That's it. What the Founding Fathers created is dead. Only an animated corpse resembling it remains. The whole point of the Constitution was limited government. And THAT is what died today.

Misthiocracy
Joined
Aug '10
Misthiocracy

Does this hurt InTrade's credibility?

Terry
Joined
Jun '11
Terry
Misthiocracy: Does this hurt InTrade's credibility? · 2 minutes ago

The issue traded wasn't whether ACA would be upheld, technically the market was: 

"The US Supreme Court to rule individual mandate unconstitutional before midnight ET 31 Dec 2012"

(Since there will be no activity by the SCOTUS between now and 12/31/2012 the issue is effectively closed-- but won't pay off until January 1, 2013). 

When the decision was announced YES was approximately  69.9%  Since the decision actually changed the "mandate" to a "tax" I'm at a loss to assess InTrade's credibility.  Five said a "mandate" was unconstitutional but one of them, the CJ said it was actually a tax not a mandate.  It seems to me that the YES trade was the right one but there's a big fight going on amongst traders right now.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In