Paul A. Rahe · October 3, 2012 at 9:54pm

When they were trying to persuade us that it was all over -- that the fact that Romney was doing markedly less well than Obama in the polls of registered voters meant that he was cooked -- the pundits and journalists who belong to what was, in 2008, so aptly called Obama's "unofficial campaign," repeatedly told us that the debates make little or no difference and that this year the voters have already made up their minds.

But is this true? It was certainly not true in 1980, and I have said as much. But what about other years? Was everything set in concrete in those years by 1 October? The answer, as Jay Cost made abundantly clear in his post this morning, is that no Presidential race is ever decided by 1 October. The exit polling data from 1996, 2000, 2004, and 2008 suggests that anywhere from 22% to 30% of the voters make up their minds in October and that one-third to one-half of those put the decision off until the last week. When pressed by pollsters earlier on, they may state a preference or indicate that they lean one way or another, but they are open to changing their minds.

There is a reason for this. Americans have minds; they are pleased that they do; and the only proof that they have they are actually exercising judgment is that, from time to time, they actually change their minds. Americans are a cantankerous lot.

So are there swings in October? Boy are there! Take a look at Cost's chart:

Horse Race Swings In October

The opera is not over until the fat lady sings.

You should read Cost's entire piece. He also shows that Romney has been hoarding money. This month, as many within the electorate wake up, sigh, and contemplate the necessity of reaching a judgment, they are going to be bombarded.

Comments:



Joined
Apr '11
Essgee

That probably explains some of the variations we are seeing already. 

 Would be great if everything was in play until the final landslide for Romeny---that would make me sleep well election night!


Joined
Apr '12
Sweet and Low

I don't think it's a matter of people changing their minds.

I think that the Democrats have tried to make it a crime to disagree with Obama.  People are keeping their mouths shut, until they ready the polling booth.

DocJay
Joined
Jul '11
DocJay

He also shows that Romney has been hoarding money. This month, as many within the electorate wake up, sigh, and contemplate the necessity of reaching a judgment, they are going to be bombarded.

Exactly.  The Romney strategy has been to unleash everything starting now.  Obama has spent most of his money.  Romney will win this election for sure if he wins these debates.

Created Or Saved
Joined
May '11
Created Or Saved

I always wonder about the impact early voting in swing states like Ohio and Iowa has on analyses like this.  I tend to think that the early-voting electorate in those places would be made up of the more hard-core political junkie, decided partisans like those of us at Ricochet or the Lefty equivalent that would never be changing their votes in the last 4 weeks of an election, but I really have no idea. This might just be wishful thinking.

Edited on October 3, 2012 at 10:18pm

Joined
Apr '11
wmartin

I hope you and Cost are right about the money bombardment. I was hearing, and assuming, that Romney and the RNC were saving up for the reportedly unprecedented ground game. That's great, but I still think we need more ads..if they feel similarly, they need to start letting them go tomorrow.

Edited on October 3, 2012 at 10:24pm
Paul A. Rahe

Created Or Saved: I always wonder about the impact early voting in swing states like Ohio and Iowa has on analyses like this.  I tend to think that the early-voting electorate in those places would be made up of the more hard-core political junkie, decided partisans like those of us at Ricochet or the Lefty equivalent that would never be changing their votes in the last 4 weeks of an election, but I really have no idea. This might just be wishful thinking. · 5 minutes ago

Edited 2 minutes ago

You left out the graveyards. It all depends on whether one has to show an ID.

DocJay
Joined
Jul '11
DocJay

We win in spite of the usual cheating.


Joined
Apr '11
wmartin

DocJay:He also shows that Romney has been hoarding money. This month, as many within the electorate wake up, sigh, and contemplate the necessity of reaching a judgment, they are going to be bombarded.

Exactly.  The Romney strategy has been to unleash everything starting now.  Obama has spent most of his money.  Romney will win this election for sure if he wins these debates. · 10 minutes ago

Obama has not spent most of his money. He had 90 mil cash on hand at the end of August and is out-raising Romney now.

JT Friedman
Joined
Oct '11
JT Friedman

I tend to believe the myth of the true "swing" voter is just that. Very few voters change their mind each year between R and D when they pull that lever in November. However many voters like to think they are so "open minded" to be a swing voter, it makes them feel smarter.

The real truth I think is more about turn-out. Many people only vote sometimes, and only when there is someone they really like or a particular issue that speaks to them. The key to success is swinging the very few real swing voters and getting your supporters off their butts on Tuesday. 

Misthiocracy
Joined
Aug '10
Misthiocracy

The conventional wisdom I've always heard is that the majority of voters make up their mind in the final 72 hours before election day.

Conventional wisdom, told to me third hand, with no data to back it up, mind you.

Yeah...ok.
Joined
Jan '11
Yeah...ok.

So we're to examine this chart and conclude that the polls accurately reflected the electoral opinion and those opinions changed?

What am I missing (I suspect a lot)? I look at this chart and conclude the polls are poor at detecting the opinion/behavior of the voters. I do not see this as evidence that voter's changed their mind/votes between the beginning and end of October.

That isn't movement - that is error margin.

Anne R. Pierce

Like your statement:  Americans have minds; they are pleased that they do; and the only proof that they have they are actually exercising judgment is that, from time to time, they actually change their minds. Americans are a cantankerous lot.

The dumbing down of literally everything because of the assumption that everyone is numb and stupid is a self-fulfilling prophecy.


Joined
Jul '10
Jerry Carroll

CSPAN covered a discussion today between Jon Huntsman and William Kristol and a former Democratic congressman. I was struck by Kristol's certainty that Mitt will lose. Anybody know what's up with that? I know he backed others in the primaries, including the doltish governor of Texas, "Oops." But why is he trashing Romney?

Paul A. Rahe

wmartin

DocJay:He also shows that Romney has been hoarding money. This month, as many within the electorate wake up, sigh, and contemplate the necessity of reaching a judgment, they are going to be bombarded.

Exactly.  The Romney strategy has been to unleash everything starting now.  Obama has spent most of his money.  Romney will win this election for sure if he wins these debates. · 10 minutes ago

Obama has not spent most of his money. He had 90 mil cash on hand at the end of August and is out-raising Romney now. · 1 hour ago

Romney & co. have $191 million.

Paul A. Rahe

JT Friedman: I tend to believe the myth of the true "swing" voter is just that. Very few voters change their mind each year between R and D when they pull that lever in November. However many voters like to think they are so "open minded" to be a swing voter, it makes them feel smarter.

The real truth I think is more about turn-out. Many people only vote sometimes, and only when there is someone they really like or a particular issue that speaks to them. The key to success is swinging the very few real swing voters and getting your supporters off their butts on Tuesday.  · 1 hour ago

How do you explain to yourself Jay Cost's chart?

Anne R. Pierce
Jerry Carroll: CSPAN covered a discussion today between Jon Huntsman and William Kristol and a former Democratic congressman. I was struck by Kristol's certainty that Mitt will lose. Anybody know what's up with that? I know he backed others in the primaries, including the doltish governor of Texas, "Oops." But why is he trashing Romney? · 4 minutes ago

I was at a conference at Princeton in May, in which Kristol spoke and seemed much less conservative than previously and made "understanding" remarks about the Obama admin.  Everyone was bewildered as to why.

Paul A. Rahe

Anne Pierce, Guest Contributor: Like your statement:  Americans have minds; they are pleased that they do; and the only proof that they have they are actually exercising judgment is that, from time to time, they actually change their minds. Americans are a cantankerous lot.

The dumbing down of literally everything because of the assumption that everyone is numb and stupid is a self-fulfilling prophecy. · 35 minutes ago

Amen.

Paul A. Rahe
Jerry Carroll: CSPAN covered a discussion today between Jon Huntsman and William Kristol and a former Democratic congressman. I was struck by Kristol's certainty that Mitt will lose. Anybody know what's up with that? I know he backed others in the primaries, including the doltish governor of Texas, "Oops." But why is he trashing Romney? · 11 minutes ago

Bill Kristol is a good man. But he spends too much time in DC talking with other folks from DC. He should get in his car and take a very long drive. He would be amazed.

Paul A. Rahe

Yeah...ok.: So we're to examine this chart and conclude that the polls accurately reflected the electoral opinion and those opinions changed?

What am I missing (I suspect a lot)? I look at this chart and conclude the polls are poor at detecting the opinion/behavior of the voters. I do not see this as evidence that voter's changed their mind/votes between the beginning and end of October.

That isn't movement - that is error margin. · 43 minutes ago

Margin errors of ca. 10% on average? I think not. You have to choose between your conviction and the evidence, and you are firmly attached to your opinion.

Paul A. Rahe

Anne Pierce, Guest Contributor

Jerry Carroll: CSPAN covered a discussion today between Jon Huntsman and William Kristol and a former Democratic congressman. I was struck by Kristol's certainty that Mitt will lose. Anybody know what's up with that? I know he backed others in the primaries, including the doltish governor of Texas, "Oops." But why is he trashing Romney? · 4 minutes ago

I was at a conference at Princeton in May, in which Kristol spoke and seemed muchless conservative than previously and made "understanding" remarks about the Obama admin.  Everyone was bewildered as to why. · 9 minutes ago

Perhaps, his former assistant David Brooks was whispering into his ear.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In