images-1

Reading the obits, I found myself struck by one fact--of which, I confess, I'd been completely unaware:  As a naval aviator during the Korean War, Neil Armstrong flew seventy-eight combat missions. 

images-3

During one mission, his plane, flying low, clipped a cable that the North Koreans had strung across a valley as a kind of booby trap, forcing Armstrong to bail out.  He narrowly missed landing in Wonson Habor, which the North Koreans were then mining, drifting instead toward a U.S. Marine base, the wind very likely saving his life.

Seventy-eight missions.  He may have been unassuming, the very model of the quiet and fastidious engineer.  But Neil Armstrong was also one tough hombre.

Comments:


Mark Wilson
Joined
May '10
Mark Wilson

Astonishing

Gregory Conterio:  . . .  he was very good, and rarely made mistakes.  The "Right Stuff" consisted of men who were willing to take risks, yet were very thoughtful and decisive, cool-headed, and not reckless.  A tough combination to find, but Armstrong exemplified it in spades.

These were fellows who consistently made therightsplit-second decision, one right after another after another, without adequate information.

Speaking of which, there is an interesting footnote to the Apollo 11 story involving guidance engineers Steve Bales and Jack Garman.  As Armstrong piloted the lunar module on its landing approach, the guidance computer flashed a couple of alarms, which could have resulted in an abort of the landing. 

Several seconds after the first alarm Neil Armstrong, with some concern apparent in his voice said, "Give us a reading on the 1202 program alarm." Meanwhile, given his knowledge of the computer systems, Garman had already advised Steve Bales the computer could be relied upon to function adequately so long as the alarms did not become continuous. Bales, who as guidance officer had to quickly decide whether to abort the mission over these alarms, trusted Garman's judgement and informed flight director [Gene] Kranz.

Read here.

Douglas
Joined
Mar '11
Douglas
Gregory Conterio: Astronauts were recruited almost exclusively from combat pilots, and Armstrong was indeed a good-one.  He wasn't flashy or high-profile, like Glenn, Yeager or Gabreski

Buzz Aldrin said Armstrong was the best pilot he ever saw. Yeager said flat out that he wasn't a very good pilot at all. When you grew up as an airplane freak, it was a little disconcerting to see your heroes ripping each other. To this day, Yeager insists Armstrong was ... well, I'll let him tell you:  

"Well, Neil was a pretty good engineer. He wasn't too good an airplane driver."

One thing you have to know about Yeager, he was pretty unforgiving of failure. 

Mark Wilson
Joined
May '10
Mark Wilson

Douglas, I've read elsewhere about the rivalry between "flyboy" pilots and "engineer" pilots.  Here's what wikipedia says about it:

Many of the test pilots at Edwards praised Armstrong's engineering ability. Mile Thompson said he was "the most technically capable of the early X-15 pilots." Bill Dana said Armstrong "had a mind that absorbed things like a sponge." Those who flew for the Air Force tended to have a different opinion, especially people like Chuck Yeager and Pete Knight who did not have engineering degrees. Knight said that pilot-engineers flew in a way that was "more mechanical than it is flying," and gave this as the reason why some pilot-engineers got into trouble: their flying skills did not come naturally.

Might be one of those "narcissism of small differences" things.

Astonishing
Joined
Nov '11
Astonishing
Mark Wilson:  . . . Might be one of those "narcissism of small differences" things. ·

Perfect! A phenomenon that probably explains most of the heated disputes here on Ricochet as well.

show jt's comment (#25)

Joined
Apr '11
jt

I don't know if anyone has posted this yet but here's a nice 360 panorama of what Neil saw standing on the moon.

Edited on August 28, 2012 at 2:32am
Tutti
Joined
Nov '11
Tutti

Although its been stated in all the obituaries and eulogies, it still bears repeating again: Neil Armstrong is a true hero and the world is a much better place because of him. How fortunate for America and humanity that he was the one to take that historic step. Such grace, humility, and balls.

Chris Campion
Joined
Jul '11
Chris Campion

There's a great video of Armstrong ejecting just a second or two before his test lander crashes and explodes during a training run.

I'm assuming it's true about instinct that becomes honed after hundreds of hours of piloting - even piloting experimental lunar landers.  Push it just far enough to try to rescue the vehicle, but once the chips are cashed - ditch it.

http://lucky760.videosift.com/video/Neil-Armstrong-Ejects-From-Lunar-Lander-Testflight

Peter Robinson
Tutti: Although its been stated in all the obituaries and eulogies, it still bears repeating again: Neil Armstrong is a true hero and the world is a much better place because of him. How fortunate for America and humanity that he was the one to take that historic step. Such grace, humility, and balls. · 4 hours ago

You're at the outer edges of the Ricochet code of conduct here, but you know what?  Every word is just.

Mark Wilson
Joined
May '10
Mark Wilson

jt: I don't know if anyone has posted this yet but here's a nice 360 panorama of what Neil saw standing on the moon. · 4 hours ago

Edited 4 hours ago

That is breathtaking.  Puts me on the moon better than any other media I've run across.

Misthiocracy
Joined
Aug '10
Misthiocracy
jt: I don't know if anyone has posted this yet but here's a nice 360 panorama of what Neil saw standing on the moon.

Wow.  

For some reason, I thought there would be hills in the distance.

Maybe it's because my understanding of the moon's landscape comes from 2001 and MOON.


Joined
Aug '12
Lance Robinson

He was, in a word, an aviator.

runnybun
Joined
Sep '10
runnybun
Mark Wilson: Douglas, I've read elsewhere about the rivalry between "flyboy" pilots and "engineer" pilots. ...

In his autobiography, Yeager tells a great one on Armstrong that illustrates the difference.  NACA (NASA Civilian Pilots) wanted to send Armstrong out to the lakebeds in the high desert to test the surface for a X15 flight the next day.  Yeager said no need the lakebed was wet. Yeager had been landing on those lake beds for 10 years.   NACA insisted, and Yeager went along in the backseat.  So, just before sundown that day they're setting in the mud in a T33 with the engine at full throttle, Yeager says, "Neil, you can turn off the sumbitch, it ain't doin' nuthin' for you" (Yeager, pg 182).  It gets mighty cold up there at night.  "Yeager" is a must read for all Ricochetti! 

Mark Wilson
Joined
May '10
Mark Wilson

Misthiocracy

jt: I don't know if anyone has posted this yet but here's a nice 360 panorama of what Neil saw standing on the moon.

Wow.  

For some reason, I thought there would be hills in the distance.

Maybe it's because my understanding of the moon's landscape comes from 2001 and MOON. · 2 hours ago

Apollo 11 landed in the Sea of Tranquility, which is relatively like Nebraska in elevation.  You might find the landing sites of Apollo 15, 16, and 17 to be more in line with your expectations.

dogsbody
Joined
Sep '10
dogsbody

Joseph Stanko

That reminds me of a documentary I saw that pointed out that the Apollo program took place during the Vietnam War.  One of the Apollo astronauts interviewed said he sometimes felt guilty that he got to fly in space while his old buddies were flying combat missions over Vietnam. 

That was Gene Cernan, Apollo 17 commander, interviewed in the (very good) documentary In the Shadow of the Moon.

Glenn the Iconoclast
Joined
Apr '11
Glenn the Iconoclast

MichaelC19fan

Williams was John Glenn's wingman during Korea in theory but given Williams's WW II experience he was the flight leader.

I don't think that's right. 

Glenn had WW II combat experience, and Williams did not, only flight experience.  In one of his biographies Williams mentions attaching himself to Glenn as wingman because he was sure Glenn could teach him some things about combat.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In