Dick Armey

Former House Majority Leader and Tea Party luminary Dick Armey this week announced that his preferred pick for the 2012 GOP nomination is Governor Mitch Daniels of Indiana.  In a Newsmax interview (beginning at 6:40) Armey, who heads up the FreedomWorks strain of the Tea Party, explained that

Mitch Daniels would be the perfect pick for us; he's exactly the man with the proven record that we're looking for.  He has no need for sensation, but he knows how to get focused on the work and get it done.

As we've seen right here on Ricochet, social conservatives have expressed some dismay at Gov. Daniels' call to build a coalition that prioritizes America's fiscal issues over social issues.  However, support from the Tea Party could go a long way toward positioning the Governor as a serious contender in the GOP primaries. To purport to speak on behalf of the entire Tea Party is sheer folly; whether Dick Armey's opinion is at all consistent with that of the broader Tea Party is as yet a mystery.

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

Brian
Joined
May '10
Brian Sharkey

Thank you for posting this. Some time ago, Mitch hinted everyone would be surprised at the depth of his backing. I think this might be the first of many prominent endorsements designed to build momentum.

Brian
Joined
May '10
Brian Sharkey

a.k.a. Stage one of the great Mitch slap.

David Williamson
Joined
Mar '11
David Williamson

I wanna know where he and Boehner get their tans.

Troy Senik

One of the great virtues of Armey as a Tea Party leader -- he understands that having the right principles is a necessary, but not sufficient qualification. You have to have someone with both the political acumen and the managerial competence to see them actualized. By that standard, no one in (or potentially in) the field comes within a country mile of Daniels.

Chris Deleon
Joined
May '10
Chris Deleon

Mitch may be good on fiscal matters, and he may have been great at getting jobs for his state, but personally, before I'd consider him I'd want to a) understand his true commitment to social issues, and b) know he'll stand up to China's unfair trade, monetary, labor, environmental, and foreign policies. I'll also have to state that although he's shown leadership in some areas, in others (namely those mentioned above) he seems more likely to go along with the status quo, or to "go along to get along."


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In