James Poulos, Ed. · Aug 26, 2010 at 3:52am

It's an unenviable situation, and the cognitive dissonance is on full display at Politico:

Indiana Rep. Joe Donnelly, a second-term congressman from South Bend, is airing a new TV ad in his South Bend-area district pointing out that he voted against “Nancy Pelosi’s energy tax on Hoosier families.”

“The Donnelly ad is who he is,” said Parker. “He’s independent.”

It’s a spot that is strikingly similar to one Pennsylvania Rep. Jason Altmire is running, which features supporters praising the second-term Democrat for “stand[ing] up” to Obama and Pelosi.

[...] “Hopefully, we can rally the base and turn people out,” said Jamie Franks, chair of the Mississippi Democratic Party, who predicted his party will retain control of the House.

How to turn out the base by running like the wind from the President and the Speaker? Easy:

“We want to elevate John Boehner,” said a senior Democratic aide involved in party strategy. “We want him and his ideas to be in the forefront.”

Maybe easy's the wrong word for it.

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

Pilgrim
Joined
Jun '10
Pilgrim

Occam's razor for all Democrat candidates attempting to "distance themselves:"

Isn't it true (sir or madam) that the first vote that you will cast in the 112th Congress will be to elect Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House?

Humza Ahmad
Joined
Jul '10
Humza Ahmad

It does not bode well for a national party when individual members are putting down their leaders to garner support in their home districts, but it does lend strength to the notion that all politics are local. The media and the Left were trying to convince everyone this idea was dead when they pointed the finger at supposed widespread national opposition to Bush's policies when the Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.

Kennedy Smith
Joined
May '10
Kennedy Smith

That scary villain, John Boehner. Yikes, talk about desperate.

Trying to come up with the stages of political grief. Blaming poor messaging, calling the voters idiots, etc. Not sure where pinning your hopes on scaring people with John Boehner fits into that.

But it's very much in evidence among lib Facebook pals. They're on the calling voters idiots (manipulated sheep, by Fox News, in the main) phase. Possibly the memo hasn't filtered through on the spookiness of John Boehner.

Matthew Gilley
Joined
May '10
Matthew Gilley

Pilgrim: Occam's razor for all Democrat candidates attempting to "distance themselves:"

Isn't it true (sir or madam) that the first vote that you will cast in the 112th Congress will be to elect Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House? · Aug 26 at 6:09am

Bingo. My family lives in the Missouri district represented by Ike Skelton, a Scoop Jackson style Democrat (or at least as close as you get these days) and by all accounts of which I'm aware, a generally honorable man. He may be getting his stiffest challenge this year since his election in 1976 (I believe) and he is trying to tack to the right of his leadership, to no one's surprise. I keep telling them that this is the one question he should be forced to answer.

Kennedy Smith
Joined
May '10
Kennedy Smith

I dunno, Humzah, they turned out to be right in 2006. I think the Democrats are certainly hoping that all politics is local. But sometimes it isn't; sometimes you get a national wave.

There is a tide in the affairs of men...

EJHill
Joined
May '10
EJHill

All politics is local... except when it isn't. Congressional races become local when the issue is what Congress has done for you. It's nationalized when the issue is what Congress has done to you. Between high unemployment, health care and unsustainable debt, this is a "done to you" type of year.

Trace Urdan
Joined
May '10
Trace Urdan
EJHill: Congressional races become local when the issue is what Congress has done for you. It's nationalized when the issue is what Congress has done to you. · Aug 26 at 8:20am

My late entry for Line of the Week.

Kennedy Smith
Joined
May '10
Kennedy Smith

Local, shmocal. That could work if they voted against the Prez. But very few did. So trying to pretend they didn't doesn't work. They voted with him because he got them to sob with him "if you don't vote for it, this will destroy my Presidency". Which is disgusting. Me, me, me is all very well on Facebook. When you're deciding the fate of the greatest nation on Earth, it's just creepy.

Rob Long

Actually, running against Boehner isn't such a bad strategy, given the other bad options available to the Dems this year. But first, of course, they've got to tell voters who he is, then demonize him, which is tough sledding ten weeks before an election. It's easier to demonize people voters know already, like Gingrich and Cheney.

On the other hand, the next best strategy for them is to demonize....Pelosi and Obama, which they seem to be doing. People know who they are, and people don't like them. So it's an easier sell. But this must be the first time in history that a party ever went negative....on itself.

Kenneth
Joined
Jul '10
Kenneth

Rob Long: Actually, running against Boehner isn't such a bad strategy, given the other bad options available to the Dems this year. But first, of course, they've got to tell voters who he is, then demonize him, which is tough sledding ten weeks before an election. It's easier to demonize people voters know already, like Gingrich and Cheney.

On the other hand, the next best strategy for them is to demonize....Pelosi and Obama, which they seem to be doing. People know who they are, and people don't like them. So it's an easier sell. But this must be the first time in history that a party ever went negative....on itself. · Aug 26 at 9:54am

Boehner is such a flannel-mouthed cipher that it's nearly impossible to demonize him by saying he stands for much of anything.

Dems' best bet would be something along the lines of, "Do you trust a guy with an orange tan?"

EJHill
Joined
May '10
EJHill

The true sign of desperation will come when they start campaigning against Tom DeLay because he stunk up the Dancing with the Stars ballroom. (As a side note, DeLay was better than Tucker Carlson.)

Trace Urdan
Joined
May '10
Trace Urdan
Kenneth Boehner is such a flannel-mouthed cipher that it's nearly impossible to demonize him by saying he stands for much of anything.· Aug 26 at 10:09am

It will look like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpOUctySD68

EJHill
Joined
May '10
EJHill

Trace, that YouTube stuff is base red meat. Internet videos tend to preach to the choir. Traditional :30 broadcast ads still make the most impact because they reach audiences that are not predisposed to the message.

And that video you linked to is meant to convey that Boehner must be stopped because he would stop Obama. But if that's exactly what the voters want at this point it's counterproductive.

Kennedy Smith
Joined
May '10
Kennedy Smith

Rob Long: Actually, running against Boehner isn't such a bad strategy, given the other bad options available to the Dems this year. But first, of course, they've got to tell voters who he is, then demonize him, which is tough sledding ten weeks before an election. It's easier to demonize people voters know already, like Gingrich and Cheney.

On the other hand, the next best strategy for them is to demonize....Pelosi and Obama, which they seem to be doing. People know who they are, and people don't like them. So it's an easier sell. But this must be the first time in history that a party ever went negative....on itself. · Aug 26 at 9:54am

Only weapon to hand. Use it. But sort of sad when the best weapon you got is a stalk of wet celery.

We need an historian to weigh in whether this is the only time a party has gone negative against their leaders. Surely it's been done. Ooooh, thought of recent example. Australia.

Edited on Aug 26, 2010 at 10:59am
James Poulos, Ed.
Kennedy Smith: Local, shmocal. That could work if they voted against the Prez. But very few did. So trying to pretend they didn't doesn't work. They voted with him because he got them to sob with him "if you don't vote for it, this will destroy my Presidency". Which is disgusting. Me, me, me is all very well on Facebook. When you're deciding the fate of the greatest nation on Earth, it's just creepy. · Aug 26 at 9:06am

What's supposed to happen, of course, is that local realities cause representatives to pull the national party in the direction of those realities. Would the Democratic leadership ever respond in that way? Not that the Republican track record is as strong as many conservatives might like. But the GOP has at least proven itself better able to refresh the party tree with new blood.

EJHill
Joined
May '10
EJHill
Kennedy Smith We need an historian to weigh in whether this is the only time a party has gone negative against their leaders. Surely it's been done.

In a parliamentary democracy it happens all the time. All of the Anglo democracies have had switched party leaders in midstream. Think John Major, Gordon Brown.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In