Rob Long · February 14, 2013 at 3:58am

Words, I think, fail.

From The Hill, some choice delusional ramblings from the Master of the Craft, Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee:

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) urged her colleagues to reach a compromise to prevent spending cuts through sequestration, arguing that government programs are already as lean as they can be.

"We're at the bone almost, and sequester, that is across-the-board cuts, will literally destroy us and put us in a recession," she said on the House floor Wednesday.

She called on Republicans to meet Democrats at the negotiating table and rejected the idea that President Obama delivered a partisan State of the Union address Tuesday night.

Sequester, remember, is an idea put forth by President Barack Obama. It's what we might call an Obama Sequester. In fact, we should start calling it that.  

And the idea that government programs are already as lean as they can be would be laughable if I didn't also have TurboTax open on my desktop.

Comments:


George Rapp
Joined
May '10
George Rapp

She has credibility, Rob. After all, she's a freed slave (which would make her 148 years old assuming she was born in 1865): http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2013/02/13/Dem-Rep-Sheila-Jackson-Lee-Plays-The-Slave-Card

(h/t Duane Patterson, producer of the Hugh Hewitt Show, who just played this on his aftershow)

Colin B Lane
Joined
Jun '11
Colin B Lane

George Rapp: She has credibility, Rob. After all, she's a freed slave (which would make her 148 years old assuming she was born in 1865): http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2013/02/13/Dem-Rep-Sheila-Jackson-Lee-Plays-The-Slave-Card

(h/t Duane Patterson, producer of the Hugh Hewitt Show, who just played this on his aftershow) · 0 minutes ago

She certainly appears to possess the reasoning capacity of a 148 year old.

Scott Reusser
Joined
May '10
Scott Reusser

Well, she's nuts for considering these cuts painful, but it's pleasant that she does. Bring on the Sequester. Followed by Sequester II, III, and IV.  


Joined
Feb '13
Ed Allie

It does make you wonder about those voters who keep sending her back to DC.  Unless they are just trying to keep her far out of TX.

Anne R. Pierce

Words fail, but they also successfully deceive. From the last century to this, words have been tools used to make bad look good, and to make tyranny look like equality.

Susan in Seattle
Joined
Apr '11
Susan in Seattle

It's so reassuring that she can use "literally" much the same way our esteemed Vice President can.

Jimmy Carter
Joined
Jul '10
Jimmy Carter

I blame Lee's election success on Aaron for not working hard enough down there.

Chris Campion
Joined
Jul '11
Chris Campion

"We're at the bone almost, and sequester, that is across-the-board cuts, will literally destroy us and put us in a recession," she said on the House floor Wednesday.

Hey, slick - we're already in a recession.  Your spending is what's put us there.  Cause and effect, genius.

These are the best people we can put in Congress out of a nation of 300 million?  To paraphrase Public Enemy, it takes a nation of millions to keep electing idiots to the highest posts in the land.

Awful.  She's simply awful.

Colin B Lane
Joined
Jun '11
Colin B Lane

Rob Long: Words, I think, fail.

From The Hill, some choice delusional ramblings from the Master of the Craft, Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee:

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) urged her colleagues to reach a compromise to prevent spending cuts through sequestration, arguing that government programs are already as lean as they can be.

"We're at the bone almost . . . .

At the bone, Democrat-style.

Edited on February 14, 2013 at 5:02am
SweetTexasCrude
Joined
Dec '12
SweetTexasCrude

I want Sheila to stick around, so whenever an effete Northeastern liberal talks about all those ignorant nutjob right-wing politicians from Texas, I can point to her to prove that being an ignorant nutjob is a bipartisan affair.

Clandesteyn
Joined
Aug '10
Clandesteyn

We're at the bone!  How can you run this country on a budget as scant as $2.1 trillion?  We need to tack on $1 trillion dollar deficits because the rich refuse to pay their fair share! 

Spin
Joined
Nov '10
Spin

I've had to go through budget cuts myself, and look at a list of names and decide which had to go.  They are easy at first.  But after 3 or 4 rounds, they become hard.  Look across the table at someone who's worked at the company for 20+ years and tell them it's time for them to leave.  Go through a budget and cut 30%, no matter what.  That's what is meant by "to the bone."

KC Mulville
Joined
Jan '11
KC Mulville
snoopy laughing

The key to achieving bipartisanship is not to laugh hysterically when lunatic Democrats begin speaking in their gibberish.

.

.

snoopy laughing 2

I don't care how hard it may seem, but we can't be caught snickering at this sort of stuff.

.

.

If the cameras show us laughing at Democrats, it may hurt our image as wanting to be bipartisan. And we all want to look like we enjoy bipartisanship, don't we?

 

working with democrats
Caroline
Joined
May '10
Caroline

At least she didn't say anything silly such as talking about an island tipping over or mental midgets.

Astonishing
Joined
Nov '11
Astonishing

Sheila is my esteemed representative. Her husband Elwine Lee taught me Torts in first year law school. In all my years of schooling, he was (in my opinion) my worst teacher ever. I had the distinction of Am Juring his course.


Joined
Mar '11
rosegarden sj dad

The sequester gambit has boomeranged on the Dems and Obama. Originally, they relied on the Repubs fighting sequestation because the Repubs were so attached to defense spending. But here's the rub: the sequester makes cuts to the defense that Obama wants to make *anyway.* So the sequester takes away the chess move they were planning on making to cut spending. And they have to endure cuts to domestic programs as well.  They can't fight defense cuts today and then make them tomorrow. They are hosed. Bring on sequester. At least we'll get domestic cuts we wouldn't get otherwise, and the defense cuts were already built into the model.

Starve the Beast
Joined
Dec '10
Starve the Beast

Long ago, the Supreme Court decided that it was constitutional to gerrymander districts that created majority-black districts. I probably would have done the same... I bet it felt like a wonderful thing at the time.

But it backfired. The race-bating faction of the left managed to  take over these areas, and now they're the kinds of places that keep crazies like this in positions of power.

Cutlass
Joined
Apr '11
Cutlass
Caroline: At least she didn't say anything silly such as talking about an island tipping over or mental midgets.

Hey, Rep. Hank Johnson took the floor to apologize for saying the dreaded midget...I mean M-word.

It's amazing how Democrats  get away with mocking "nuts" on the right, or this ludicrous outcry over Rubio drinking water, when they repeatedly elect incomprehensible buffoons to Congress.

Rob Long
Jimmy Carter: I blame Lee's election success on Aaron for not working hard enough down there. · 3 hours ago

I agree.  It's Aaron's fault.

Boymoose
Joined
Jul '10
Boymoose

Rob Long

Jimmy Carter: I blame Lee's election success on Aaron for not working hard enough down there. · 3 hours ago

I agree.  It's Aaron's fault. · 6 hours ago

Yes its all Arrons fault.

I have heard (and I’m not sure its true so of course I will repeat it here ) that the republicans drew her district so only an individual of here capabilities could be elected.

SheJack is the gift that keeps on giving.  She goes through more staff than Elton John does cabana boys!

Edited on February 14, 2013 at 3:18pm

Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In