In the Wall Street Journal today, Bret Stephens discusses a report on Cuban health care that appears in the current issue of Foreign Affairs magazine. As Stephens notes, the author, Laurie Garrett, makes it clear that she admires the Cuban health care system. She is nevertheless unable to prevent herself from noting that, of the 73,000 licensed physicians in Cuba, more than half work overseas, and that, of the half that remains in Cuba, some large but unknown number drive taxis, work in hotels, or take other jobs rather than work for the $25 a month they would receive by remaining in medicine. So much for the Cuban doctor-patient ratio. A low infant mortality rate? Yes, if you believe the Cuban statistics. (Which a lot of well-informed and reasonable people most certainly do not.) But what about the high rate of maternal mortality? "Most deaths," Garrett writes, "occur during delivery or within the next 48 hours and are caused by uterine hemorrhage or postpartum sepsis."

Viva la revolucion.

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

Matthew Gilley
Joined
May '10
Matthew Gilley

Considering the article's conclusions, maybe "viva" is not the right word - "muerto" (or the proper conjugation thereof) seems more apt.

Duane Oyen
Joined
May '10
Duane Oyen

Clearly, they need to bring Ignacz Semmelweis back to life.

Mark Wilson
Joined
May '10
Mark Wilson

Matthew, I believe it would be "se muera".

Peter, isn't this just all the more convincing evidence of the great damage done by American imperialism and capitalism?


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In