Bill McGurn · Mar 10, 2011 at 3:16pm

I never thought I'd ever hear myself saying I'm with Columbia (on anything). But I am if this account from National Review is accurate. It reports that Columbia canceled a planned speech by the VP for the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, on the grounds that he had a few years ago disrupted a Columbia commencement. It seems to me that if universities enforced not speech codes but basic civility and respect for others, we would all be better off. Animal rights is a very interesting debate, and there are any number of people who can make the case for it who do not believe in disruption.

I can't find anything about the 2004 incident that is said to have led to this cancelation. I grant you the double standards given some of the other people who have spoken at Columbia. But I do not see why we should treat people who one day will disrupt and another day debate as members of a civil society dedicated to open debate and conversation...

No comments yet



Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In