EJHill · February 17, 2013 at 9:14pm
Both Ways

Our friend Simon Templar truly is a Saint. He likes to argue with liberals.

The problem here is that it's hard to argue logically with people who hold views that are inherently contradictory. Here's my favorite from this week:

When arguing for a carbon tax, liberal politicians and their followers make the argument that government interference that artificially increases the cost of something will decrease the demand for it. When arguing for an increase in the minimum wage, liberal politicians and their followers make the argument that government interference which artificially increases the cost of something will not decrease the demand for it.

So which is it?

What is your favorite liberal contradiction?

Comments:


Denise McAllister

Here are two of my favorites:

They believe in Darwinism and survival of the fittest, yet reject Free Market Capitalism and success of the fittest

They support pro-homosexuality and Muslims who hold to Sharia law, which is violently anti-homosexual.

Doug Kimball
Joined
Aug '11
Doug Kimball

States can enact laws that mirror federal immigration laws but they cannot enforce them, even if state law enforcement authorities had previously been enlisted to help federal authorities under a formal cooperation agreement.   In the meantime, federal authorities ignore violations of federal immigation law and only selectively cooperate with local authorities in legitimate criminal cases where the perpetrators admit or are known to be here illegally.

Eeyore
Joined
Jun '10
Eeyore

Cutting taxes on businesses lowers Federal revenue (or even if occasionally acknowledged to raise revenues, it's not "fair")

Unemployment payouts raise Federal revenue by creating jobs.

Contradiction and inaccuracy in one package.

Simon Templar
Joined
Dec '12
Simon Templar

Conservatives are racists for opposing liberal policies that have contributed to almost tripling the percentage (24% in 1965 to 72% in 2012) of black babies born to single mothers.  

How could I not respond after that shout out?

Doug Kimball
Joined
Aug '11
Doug Kimball

In Democrat parlance, fair is when someone else pays for your benefits.   Since politicians tell you that you are entitled to more and government must borry to give it to you, obviously those paying are not paying enough, which is unfair.  The deficits and debt that result from this are evidence of this unfairness.  Balance is achieved when those paying, pay more, not when those receiving, receive less.

Central Scrutinizer
Joined
Dec '12
Central Scrutinizer

BINGO!!!!

Denise McAllister:

They believe in Darwinism and survival of the fittest, yet reject Free Market Capitalism and success of the fittest

Central Scrutinizer
Joined
Dec '12
Central Scrutinizer

2nd to post #1:

You're greedy and selfish for wanting to keep what you earn and not happily give it to government to spread it around for you.

Palaeologus
Joined
Jul '10
Palaeologus

I suppose the one that stands out to me is the fact that they are simultaneously zealously pro-choice and anti-discrimination.

We should start calling the NARAL types the pro-discrimination lobby.

Full Size Tabby
Joined
Oct '12
Full Size Tabby

Government employees need unions because government officials can't be trusted to treat employees fairly.

Medical care must be put in the hands of the government because government officials are the only people who can be trusted to distribute medical care fairly.

Edited on February 15, 2013 at 11:06pm
3rd angle projection
Joined
Dec '12
3rd angle projection

In this case, instead of favorite, I would say most tragic...Late term abortion is ok but the Scott Peterson's of the world should be tried for homicide of an unborn baby.

Bi-partisanship is when conservatives agree with liberals. When liberals oppose conservatives, it's patriotic (disclaimer: not responsible for the disturbing images accompanying this audio).

Scott Reusser
Joined
May '10
Scott Reusser

It's immoral to detain and harshly interrogate terrorist suspects, but it's acceptible to incinerate them, their families, and anyone else unlucky enough to be nearby.

3rd angle projection
Joined
Dec '12
3rd angle projection

This is a favorite.

Scott Reusser: It's immoral to detain and harshly interrogate terrorist suspects, but it's acceptible to incinerate them, their families, and anyone else unlucky enough to be nearby. · 58 minutes ago
Simon Templar
Joined
Dec '12
Simon Templar
Scott Reusser: It's immoral to detain and harshly interrogate terrorist suspects, but it's acceptible to incinerate them, their families, and anyone else unlucky enough to be nearby. · 5 hours ago

Can't wait to try this one out!  Hat tip to EJ.

dittoheadadt
Joined
Oct '10
dittoheadadt
Scott Reusser: It's immoral to detain and harshly interrogate terrorist suspects, but it's acceptible to incinerate them, their families, and anyone else unlucky enough to be nearby. · 12 hours ago

Problem is, this is (I think) consistent with the Geneva Conventions.  That is, in warfare you can kill your enemy but you cannot torture him. 

Forget for a moment that waterboarding isn't torture; if the Left believes that it is, then it's not a contradiction for them to favor drone attacks over waterboarding.

dittoheadadt
Joined
Oct '10
dittoheadadt

My submission is:

"Bush's tax cuts for the rich."

Fact: the "rich's" share of tax payments relative to taxable income actually increased subsequent to Bush's tax rate cuts.  But try to get a Leftist to actually engage in a debate on this.  Won't happen.  I've tried.

Garrett Petersen
Joined
Dec '11
Garrett Petersen

"Capitalism might be good for increasing the total amount of wealth, but it all goes to the rich!  You need to think about the distribution, not just the amount of wealth."

"We need to reduce the number of guns, because they kill people!"  (No thought to the distribution of guns, just the total amount.)

Edited on February 17, 2013 at 5:25am
West Facing Squirrel
Joined
Aug '12
West Facing Squirrel

My favorite is the mantra of "Get out of my uterus!" while demanding taxpayer-funded contraceptives. It is also amusing that we went from "Marriage is just a piece of paper," to "Marriage is a right!"

Fake John Galt
Joined
Jul '11
Fake John Galt

Anti Death Penality - killing is wrong for any reason, innocents get killed
Anti War - killing is wrong for any reason, innocents get killed
Pro Abortion - killing is ok if the mother decides to do it, an unborn child does not count as an innocent

Fricosis Guy
Joined
Jun '11
Fricosis Guy

I'm more interested in puncturing their myths. Like that Nixon or Dubya were right-wingers or that JFK was a bleeding heart liberal.

They drown their contradictions in their good intentions.

Sisyphus
Joined
Jul '10
Sisyphus

It is absolutely forbidden to discriminate against females, except at the abortionist's office.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In