cain

So says a conservative strategist about Herman Cain, and it is inarguable that the odds are against him. But take a look at his speech before the Value Voters Summit yesterday (h/t Weekly Standard) and ask yourself: is any other candidate capable of articulating the cases for American exceptionalism and the conservative vision so clearly and persuasively? The answer should give "realists" pause - it's too easy to make the leap from "difficult" to "impossible" when it comes to nominating someone who doesn't fit the mold of a candidate that's set by casting central. Pay particular attention to how he defines leadership - the contrast between his executive approach and the dithering and excuse-making we've seen over the past 3 years couldn't be more stark.

This is a man making a strong case for his candidacy - will enough GOP voters take the time to listen?

Comments:


Crow's Nest
Joined
Mar '11
Crow's Nest

Katievs: Your comments in #35 and #37 are right on.

Israel P.
Joined
Feb '11
Israel P.

The bit about the order of 'life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" in the seventh minute, is nice.  Is that original?


Joined
Apr '11
Viator

Cain has a BS in math, a MS in computer science, was a mathematician in ballistics for the US Navy,  has turned two failing divisions of Pillsbury around, was Board member and Chairman of the Kansas Federal Reserve and was a principal in a leveraged buyout of Godfathers Pizza where he was CEO. His so called lack of experience in certain areas might be more than made for by his experience with private enterprise, knowledge of which is in very short supply in Washington, DC. His real world knowledge of the economy may exceed any other candidate.  He has shown a great deal of excellence as a CEO. If he needs foreign policy expertise John Bolton might be available. In fact the think tanks are crammed with all kinds of high level experts who generally have very little effect on events as far as I can see. Maybe he could put some of them to work.

katievs
Joined
May '10
katievs

Tom Paine

The President will be surrounded with contending experts.  He'll be surrounded with enemies and traitors, liars, deceivers and manipulators, plus countless people more interested in advancing their own careers than the wellbeing of the nation. · Oct 8 at 11:28am

Sounds just like every corporation I've ever worked for. · Oct 8 at 11:35am

Right.  But you must understand that politics is just not business.  They are two different worlds.  They operate by different laws and principles and traditions.  They call for different bodies of knowledge, different sets of skills.

It is naive in the extreme to imagine that business experience is enough to prepare a man for success at the highest level of politics.

Western Chauvinist
Joined
Dec '10
Western Chauvinist

katievs

etoiledunord: The important question is, is the candidate humble enough to take advice from people who understand a particular problem better than he does? That's the question. As long as the President has commonsense, and knows that he doesn't know everything, he'll be alright. And who has more experts at his beck and call than a President of the United States? 

This is too optimistic, I fear.  It's not as if "experts" agree.  The President will be surrounded with contending experts.  He'll be surrounded with enemies and traitors, liars, deceivers and manipulators, plus countless people more interested in advancing their own careers than the wellbeing of the nation.

This suggests that the man has no core, can't pick advisers, and can't discern the various interests they represent.  I would never say that about either Herman Cain or Barack Obama.  Barack Obama derives his principles from hard left ideology and chose his advisers accordingly.  Herman Cain derives his core from conservatism.  I would advise him to announce his team early and to choose proven conservatives with the political experience he lacks.  His experience of the world is more than adequate. 

DrewInWisconsin
Joined
Aug '11
DrewInWisconsin

katievs

It is naive in the extreme to imagine that business experience is enough to prepare a man for success at the highest level of politics.

Depends on the sort of success you want. Do we want someone who is a successful politician?

katievs
Joined
May '10
katievs

Western Chauvinist

This suggests that the man has no core, can't pick advisers, and can't discern the various interests they represent. 

No, only that Presidential level politics isn't for political beginners. 

Michael Jordan was the greatest basketball player ever in the world.  When he retired to try his hand at baseball, he had to start in the minor leagues.  He never got very far.   It's a different sport.  No matter how great a natural athlete you may be, you can't just step from the top of one to the top of the other. 

Edited on October 8, 2011 at 9:03pm
katievs
Joined
May '10
katievs

DrewInWisconsin

katievs

It is naive in the extreme to imagine that business experience is enough to prepare a man for success at the highest level of politics.

Depends on the sort of success you want. Do we want someone who is a successful politician? · Oct 8 at 11:53am

Of course we do.  The Presidency is the nations top political office, is it not?  The President is not the national CEO, nor are his fellow politicians employees.  Politics is its own art and science, it's own field of endeavor.  

Tom Paine
Joined
Aug '11
Tom Paine

katievs

Tom Paine

The President will be surrounded with contending experts.  He'll be surrounded with enemies and traitors, liars, deceivers and manipulators, plus countless people more interested in advancing their own careers than the wellbeing of the nation. · Oct 8 at 11:28am

Sounds just like every corporation I've ever worked for. · Oct 8 at 11:35am

Right.  But you must understand that politics is just not business.  They are two different worlds.  They operate by different laws and principles and traditions.  They call for different bodies of knowledge, different sets of skills.

It is naive in the extreme to imagine that business experience is enough to prepare a man for success at the highest level of politics. · Oct 8 at 11:49am

As naive as to imagine that experience as a community organizer is preparation for the presidency?

As naive as to imagine that a failed half-term Governor is adequately prepared?

As naive as to imagine that an unprincipled, erratic Senator from Arizona is adequately prepared?


Joined
Apr '11
Viator

katievs


This is too optimistic, I fear.  It's not as if "experts" agree.  The President will be surrounded with contending experts.  He'll be surrounded with enemies and traitors, liars, deceivers and manipulators, plus countless people more interested in advancing their own careers than the wellbeing of the nation. · Oct 8 at 11:28am

Sounds just like every corporation I've ever worked for. · Oct 8 at 11:35am

"Sounds just like every corporation I've ever worked for."

Exactly, Cain has worked at the highest levels in several corporations including failing corporations and always excelled.

Imagine taking over a failing 1,000 restaurant chain where you''ll "be surrounded with enemies and traitors, liars, deceivers and manipulators, plus countless people more interested in advancing their own careers than the well being"

In fact, isn't the US Government one giant turnaround project?

DrewInWisconsin
Joined
Aug '11
DrewInWisconsin

katievs

No, only that Presidential level politics isn't for political beginners. 

Michael Jordan was the greatest basketball player ever in the world.  When he retired to try his hand at baseball, he had to start in the minor leagues.  He never got very far.   It's a different sport.  Now matter how great an athlete you may be, you can't just step from the top of one to the top of the other.  · Oct 8 at 11:58am

Katie, I think what's bothering me about this approach that you and others place on having previously held political office is that I don't put a lot of stock in holding political office. To me it's the equivalent of saying "to be a fine, accomplished actor, you have to start out by doing a lot of porno."

katievs
Joined
May '10
katievs

Tom Paine

As naive as to imagine that experience as a community organizer is preparation for the presidency?

Yes.  As naive as that.

As naive as to imagine that a failed half-term Governor is adequately prepared?

The most-just critique of Sarah Palin's potential presidential run is that she wasn't experienced enough.  Even so, to have won elective office by running against a corrupt establishment in her own party was a stunning political achievement.  Her effective governance in office was proof of usually great political ability.  We have no such proof with Cain.

Tom Paine As naive as to imagine that an unprincipled, erratic Senator from Arizona is adequately prepared? · Oct 8 at 12:03pm

McCain's deficiencies were not lack of political experience.

Crow's Nest
Joined
Mar '11
Crow's Nest

Here's what it boils down to for me:

As a conservative, I refuse to make the best the enemy of the good. But I also refuse to lose sight of the best even while I pursue the good.

By my lights, all of our candidates this year (so far) fall short. They fall short both on their records as defenders of the kind of conservatism and governance I support, and as intellectual leaders who can articulate a vision of society that broadly accords with ours as conservatives. These aren't trite failures.

Therefore, I feel no compunction not to air my grievances with each of the candidates. President Reagan's 11th Commandment is suitable gentlemanly guidance to conservative office holders and opinion leaders asked their opinion in public--this does not make it anathema to conservatism to critique our own (even if, occasionally, someone on the other side might share our criticism).

Were Mr. Cain to get the nod, I would put my support behind him because he would be less dangerous (generally) for the country than a second term for Obama. But its not as though I'm blind as to the glaring problems in his resume.

katievs
Joined
May '10
katievs

DrewInWisconsin

Katie, I think what's bothering me about this approach that you and others place on having previously held political office is that I don't put a lot of stock in holding political office. To me it's the equivalent of saying "to be a fine, accomplished actor, you have to start out by doing a lot of porno." · Oct 8 at 12:04pm

Rather it's like saying to be a fine accomplished actor, you have to have acted.  

Tom Paine
Joined
Aug '11
Tom Paine

It's simple: what counts right now is a candidate with the principles to do what needs to be done to restore the Republic.

Romney fails that test.  Rick Perry, with his comment about the heartlessness of those who disagree with in-state tuition, has proven he does, too.

That leaves Herman Cain.

DrewInWisconsin
Joined
Aug '11
DrewInWisconsin

katievs

DrewInWisconsin

Katie, I think what's bothering me about this approach that you and others place on having previously held political office is that I don't put a lot of stock in holding political office. To me it's the equivalent of saying "to be a fine, accomplished actor, you have to start out by doing a lot of porno."

Rather it's like saying to be a fine accomplished actor, you have to have acted.

Aw, don't mess up my aphorism!

But what I'm pointing out is that, to me (and, I'll wager, to a majority of Americans), the world of "politics" is just as sleazy as porno. And I don't limit that to Democrats. With very few exceptions, it seems like every proper and upright Mr. Smith goes to Washington and gets run through Slyvester McMonkey McBean's Automatic Political Corruption Machine.

So why do I want someone who's been through that machine? Or, more accurately, why would I trust someone who's been through the machine? Why would I trust them to not fall prey to the money, power, vanity, bribery, etc. . . . ?

katievs
Joined
May '10
katievs

Viator

In fact, isn't the US Government one giant turnaround project? · Oct 8 at 12:04pm

Yes.  But it's a political project, not a business project.  It can't be done as if it were a business.  For instance, in a business, the other players are all employees of the company.  Congress is not in the employ of the President.  They are independent agents answerable to their constituents, not to the President.  In business the prime "end" is profit, the "theme" is efficiency.  In politics the "end" is better expressed as justice or a well-ordered society.  The "theme" is law. 

Obama's inexperience becomes particularly glaring when he talks to and about Congressmen as if they were a community and he their organizer.  It's embarrassing.

katievs
Joined
May '10
katievs

DrewInWisconsin

But what I'm pointing out is that, to me (and, I'll wager, to a majority of Americans), the world of "politics" is just as sleazy as porno. 

Well, I can only say you should resist that imagination.  Objectively, political science and republican governance is a noble human endeavor.  It's also one we can't do without.  And if we want good governance at the highest levels, we had better elect good men and women, skilled in those arts.

Tom Paine
Joined
Aug '11
Tom Paine

katievs

DrewInWisconsin

But what I'm pointing out is that, to me (and, I'll wager, to a majority of Americans), the world of "politics" is just as sleazy as porno. 

Well, I can only say you should resist that imagination.  Objectively, political science and republican governance is a noble human endeavor.  m

Where did we ever get the idea that politics is a science?  It's not even an art.

K T Cat
Joined
Sep '10
K T Cat

I hear Clark Kent is thinking of getting into the race as well, but I am not too excited about it. His resume is too thin, too.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In