That's what Barbara Bush told Larry King in an interview that is set to air tonight on CNN. Here's the tart Barbara Bush on Sarah Palin, and a somewhat befuddled George H.W. Bush on the tea party that he is "confused" by:

In case you're somewhere where you can't watch the clip, here is what Barbara Bush says about Palin:

"I sat next to her once, thought she was beautiful. And I think she's very happy in Alaska. And I hope she'll stay there."

This comes days after Palin told the New York Times magazine that she's "engaged in the internal deliberations" about a potential 2012 bid. Palin also told Barbara Walters recently that if she runs, she thinks she can beat Obama.

And that's with or without Barbara Bush's vote.

Huffin' and puffin', Frank Rich also thinks that Palin can beat Obama in 2012--but only if there's a third-party spoiler (namely, Michael Bloomberg).

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

Dave Carter

Lovely couple. A tad disconnected perhaps, but no harm, really.

Nathaniel Wright
Joined
Aug '10
Nathaniel Wright

Barbara is stating a personal preference. It should be treated as such. If I were asked the same question, my answer would be much different.

I think that Palin is a wonderful advocate of conservative ideas and a perfect lightning rod for liberal attacks. She is the twitter equivalent of Bill Buckley. She has a straightforward and clear understanding of conservatism that can be expressed 140 characters at a time.

She is neither a philosopher, nor a statesman -- but she is a great voice. She should stay in the arena where she can make the most positive impact. I prefer that she continues as kingmaker and spark for discussion by conservatives regarding what conservatism means.

I would not vote for her in a primary election for President. I believe there are more statesmanlike choices who would benefit from her support and clarity in the primary crucible. I think she should run because it would force candidates to answer very tough questions from primary voters, and increase voter information regarding the "souls" of the candidates in question.

I would vote for her in the general election, as she is far superior to anything the progressives have to offer.

Duane Oyen
Joined
May '10
Duane Oyen

Frank Rich says that because he is trying to set up Obama's re-election in as easy terms as possible. He doesn't want the DNC to have to spend congressional campaign money trying to bail out the prez against someone like Thune or Pawlenty.

Kennedy Smith
Joined
May '10
Kennedy Smith

Barb's got the blood of one President in her veins, married one, and spawned at least one. I must give her a tip of the elite cocktail-swilling squish cap. Know when I'm beat.

My reason for not wanting The Divine Sarah to run is that she simply can't win. No way, no how. She can do the job, but she'll never get the job, and meanwhile she'd cause a lot of distracting drama. It'd be like Rush running for president. Got bad idea written all over it.

Cas Balicki
Joined
Jun '10
Cas Balicki

At this point I’m an agnostic on whether Palin should run or not, but I will say this: The most devastating questions I have ever heard in a board room were always asked by the guy sitting at the head of the table and were usually prefixed with words to the effect: “I not the sharpest knife in the drawer…” or “I’m a country boy not inclined to fast talkin’ big city ways…” I think you get the point, self-deprecation smoothing the way for the eviscerating shiv. Good president’s don’t do they delegate. To whom do they delegate? Why to experts with expertise. Anyone who can frame a debate in less than 140 words strikes me as someone who can ask the devastating questions that need to be asked. Now, I’m not asking anyone to vote for anyone, I’m just citing personal experience.

flownover
Joined
Aug '10
flownover

The press will be looking for more people who say the same thing. Look what good it did Kathleen Parker . Pretty soon, you'll see TV stars saying mean things, maybe Whoopi Goldberg or somebody from Glee.

Then it will become more and more obscure, we'll be getting a cable show devoted to Hating Sarah, Bill Moyers will be reconstituted. They'll create holographic debates so Abe Lincoln can clean her clock, Emma Lazarus in a pinch will do a roundtable with Margaret Mead and Susan B Anthony.

Tina Fey will be tapped as a new Czar of something sounding crucial to the country's well-being ( maybe guarding Alec Baldwin and Charlie Sheen on Gitmo).

We love Barbara Bush and forgive her patrician asides and we promise not to read the needlepoint pillows in her den.

I can't wait for the day when the press treats Hillary Clinton with the same obvious indulgent snarkiness with which they presented us the Bushes. Shame on them .

Edited on Nov 22, 2010 at 11:32am
Kennedy Smith
Joined
May '10
Kennedy Smith

I'm mainly just shocked that one of the Three Furies just referred to Barbara Bush as a tart.

John Marzan
Joined
Oct '10
John Marzan

I've said this before and i'll say it again-- The media/MSM is using sarah palin to destroy the GOP (at the same time, Palin is using the media to make money.)

Whether the liberal MSM savages her (which will have conservatives automatically rallying around Palin) or give her and her family some positive attention (the reality show, Bristol Palin in DWTS), the intention here is to build her up by always having her in the news so that she is the "inevitable" choice for conservatives in the primaries-- while denying other rivals for the presidency (christie, mitch daniels, john thune) the attention they need to viably challenge Palin for the Republican nomination.

The defacto leader of the GOP (according to the MSM) used to be Rush Limbaugh. Now, they have someone better: Sarah Palin

The Dems/MSM want to see Palin win the nomination so they can crush her ala Christine o'Donnell and Sharon Angle in the general elections vs Obama.

Edited on Nov 22, 2010 at 8:57pm
Paul DeRocco
Joined
Aug '10
Paul DeRocco

I really wonder if Sarah Palin could bring herself to leave Alaska. Her new reality show paints a picture of a family that is so embedded in the near-wilderness culture of the state that I find it hard to imagine them transplanting themselves to the wretched, corrupt urban culture of Washington, D.C. It's possible that Sarah herself is that ambitious, but could Todd stand trying to play the "first dude" role in an eastern seabord city, where the only wildlife is the rabbits and squirrels? It wouldn't surprise me if the family overruled her at the last moment.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In