Diane Ellis · December 29, 2011 at 4:58am

Larry Kudlow over at National Review on why one of the fathers of supply-side economics favors Gingrich:

“The purpose of economic policy is growth, jobs, and prosperity,” supply-side founder Art Laffer told me today. As such, Laffer has endorsed Newt Gingrich and the Gingrich 15 percent flat-tax plan, which includes the 12.5 percent corporate-tax reform. “It’s nothing against the other candidates,” Laffer said. “But Newt’s plan is right, and therefore endorsing him is the right thing to do.”

[...]

Art Laffer believes the Gingrich plan would help jolt the economy to 4 or 5 percent growth. And he also is impressed that Gingrich has been talking about King Dollar on the campaign trail along with his supply-side tax strategy.

Comments:


Mel Foil
Joined
Jun '10
etoiledunord

A President Gingrich will embarrass endorsers someday, but it won't be by timidity, or bigotry, or by some inexcusable ignorance. Gingrich will embarrass you by some off-the-wall political strategy. But, somehow that's easier to take, and easier to correct.

Edited on December 29, 2011 at 5:21am
Punumba!
Joined
Apr '11
Punumba!

I find it bizarre how so many well informed intelligent people can disagree so vehemently on Newt.  Half the people I follow think if he gets the nomination it wouldn't be so bad (Goldberg, Laffer, Mike Rosen) others seem to think he would be worse than President Obama (Epstine, Yoo, Rubin).  What gives?

Robert Bennett
Joined
May '10
Robert Bennett

Thomas Sowell too seemed to tepidly come out for Newt.  That's two major economists.

The Cloaked Gaijin
Joined
Nov '11
The Cloaked Gaijin
Punumba!: I find it bizarre how so many well informed intelligent people can disagree so vehemently on Newt.  Half the people I follow think if he gets the nomination it wouldn't be so bad (Goldberg, Laffer, Mike Rosen) others seem to think he would be worse than President Obama (Epstine, Yoo, Rubin).  What gives? · Dec 28 at 10:49pm

I think it's a regional thing and a matter or taste. 

Newt and Mitt are similar in many ways. 

It just depends upon what type of leader you find more embarrassing:

George McClellan or Ulysses S. Grant

Bernard Montgomery or George Patton

Nelson Rockefeller or Barry Goldwater

George H. W. Bush or George W. Bush

Gerald Ford or Ronald Reagan

John McCain or Sarah Palin

The "elites" just don't want to be embarrassed; that's what is most important to them.

James Of England
Joined
Apr '11
James Of England

I gather that he's given up on Perry, who I suspect he held more fondness for. He surely can't believe that Gingrich actually intends to, or might have any hope of, responding to European sovereign debt crises by dramatically raising America's short-medium term deficit (the Laffer curve isn't an instant effect at anything like the tax levels seen in the US).

James Of England
Joined
Apr '11
James Of England

The Cloaked Gaijin

Punumba!: I find it bizarre how so many well informed intelligent people can disagree so vehemently on Newt.  Half the people I follow think if he gets the nomination it wouldn't be so bad (Goldberg, Laffer, Mike Rosen) others seem to think he would be worse than President Obama (Epstine, Yoo, Rubin).  What gives? · Dec 28 at 10:49pm

I think it's a regional thing and a matter or taste. 

Newt and Mitt are similar in many ways. 

It just depends upon what type of leader you find more embarrassing:

[cut series of comparisons]

The "elites" just don't want to be embarrassed; that's what is most important to them. · Dec 29 at 8:17am

Have you listened to Epstein's podtalk? Did you honestly come away from it with the impression that his concern with Newt was about social niceties? Do you think that John Yoo expresses views with his primary concern being the acceptance of bien pensant society?

Diane Ellis
James Of England: I gather that he's given up on Perry, who I suspect he held more fondness for....

Actually, I think he was supportive of Herman Cain before Cain dropped out of the race. I seem to recall Laffer having some role in developing (or at least defending) the 9-9-9 plan.

James Of England
Joined
Apr '11
James Of England

Diane Ellis, Ed.

James Of England: I gather that he's given up on Perry, who I suspect he held more fondness for....

Actually, I think he was supportive of Herman Cain before Cain dropped out of the race. I seem to recall Laffer having some role in developing (or at least defending) the 9-9-9 plan. · Dec 29 at 2:42pm

I agree, but thought he'd been positive about Perry, too, and Cain is probably not the nominee this cycle; I was wrong about his eventual endorsement and put it down to viability. I'm now somewhat doubting my earlier instinct, and appreciate the corrective pushback.

The Cloaked Gaijin
Joined
Nov '11
The Cloaked Gaijin

James Of England

 

Epstein's podtalk? Did you honestly come away from it with the impression that his concern with Newt was about social niceties?

Social niceties?  Epstein called Gingrich a fool and a madman.

"Jefferson himself was asked, is the Supreme Court supreme? And he said, that is absurd. That would be an oligarchy. Lincoln repudiates the Dred Scott decision in his first inaugural address in 1861 and says, no nine people can make law in this country. That would be the end of our freedom." -- Newt Gingrich

You mean a quote like this?

It just depends upon what type of leader you find more embarrassing:

Roger Taney or Abraham Lincoln

"I should sooner live in a society governed by the first two thousand names in the Boston telephone directory than in a society governed by the two thousand faculty members of Harvard University." -- William F. Buckley, Jr.

Why shouldn't the justices of Dred Scott and Plessy v. Ferguson have been impeached, if possible?  If I was an American African, I would certainly have wanted that to happen for my generation of friends and family.  Why live your life in bondage just to please law professors?

jetstream
Joined
Dec '10
jetstream

Diane Ellis, Ed.

James Of England: I gather that he's given up on Perry, who I suspect he held more fondness for....

Actually, I think he was supportive of Herman Cain before Cain dropped out of the race. I seem to recall Laffer having some role in developing (or at least defending) the 9-9-9 plan. · Dec 29 at 2:42pm

Laffer enthusiastically endorsed Cain's 9-9-9 Plan.  Laffer viewed it as supply-side macro policy that was very pro-growth.

James Of England
Joined
Apr '11
James Of England

The Cloaked Gaijin

Social niceties?  Epstein called Gingrich a fool and a madman.

"Jefferson himself was asked, is the Supreme Court supreme? And he said, that is absurd. That would be an oligarchy. Lincoln repudiates the Dred Scott decision in his first inaugural address in 1861 and says, no nine people can make law in this country. That would be the end of our freedom." -- Newt Gingrich

You mean a quote like this?

It just depends upon what type of leader you find more embarrassing:

Roger Taney or Abraham Lincoln

Why shouldn't the justices of Dred Scott and Plessy v. Ferguson have been impeached, if possible?  If I was an American African, I would certainly have wanted that to happen for my generation of friends and family.  Why live your life in bondage just to please law professors? ·

I meant that Epstein's motives weren't about embarrassment, but were motivated by strong feelings about Newt's policy views. I don't think that Epstein supports slavery, or Dred Scott. Did you listen to his podcast?


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In